FR Bending of Light

On Nov 23, 6:08*pm, philippeb8 wrote:
On Nov 23, 3:12*pm, PD wrote:



What answers do you think you get that GR doesn't?

GR is an art because it's validity is left to the interpreter.

??

*It
both accepts and rejects wormholes, parallel universes and a
cosmological constant.

And Newton's 2nd law accepts the presence of equilibrium and
nonequilibrium, the presence of friction and the absence of friction,
the presence of linear motion and the presence of nonlinear motion,
the presence of constant acceleration and the presence of nonconstant
acceleration.

What's your point?


"All religions, arts and sciences are branches of the same tree." --
Albert Einstein

philippeb8 wrote:

On Nov 23, 3:12 pm, PD wrote:

What answers do you think you get that GR doesn't?

GR is an art because it's validity is left to the interpreter. It
both accepts and rejects wormholes, parallel universes and a
cosmological constant.

"All religions, arts and sciences are branches of the same tree." --
Albert Einstein

Making **** up again, Phil?

On Nov 23, 5:55*pm, PD wrote:

And Newton's 2nd law accepts the presence of equilibrium and
nonequilibrium, the presence of friction and the absence of friction,
the presence of linear motion and the presence of nonlinear motion,
the presence of constant acceleration and the presence of nonconstant
acceleration.

What's your point?

PD confuses subjective experiments to the fundamental structure of the
Universe.

I forgot mentioning dark matter and time travel in the past which are
both allowed and disallowed according Einstein.

On Nov 23, 6:55*pm, philippeb8 wrote:
On Nov 23, 5:55*pm, PD wrote:



And Newton's 2nd law accepts the presence of equilibrium and
nonequilibrium, the presence of friction and the absence of friction,
the presence of linear motion and the presence of nonlinear motion,
the presence of constant acceleration and the presence of nonconstant
acceleration.

What's your point?

PD confuses subjective experiments to the fundamental structure of the
Universe.

I forgot mentioning dark matter and time travel in the past which are
both allowed and disallowed according Einstein.

Backward time was not accepted by Albert Einstein. If your clock goes
slow you can only travel into the Future of the rest of the fast
clocks in the universe.

Dark matter is ruled out.

Mitch Raemsch

On Nov 23, 5:55*pm, PD wrote:

And Newton's 2nd law accepts the presence of equilibrium and
nonequilibrium, the presence of friction and the absence of friction,
the presence of linear motion and the presence of nonlinear motion,
the presence of constant acceleration and the presence of nonconstant
acceleration.

What's your point?

PD confuses subjective experiments with the fundamental structure of
the Universe.

On Nov 23, 2:18*pm, philippeb8 wrote:
On Nov 23, 2:00*pm, Sam Wormley wrote:



* *What's with the new id, Phil?

Sam lacks discipline and does not pay attention in his classes.

Sam is too smart for himself.

Gravity bends the flow of photons. However, in 3D space, which was
are those photons or quantum string like things moving?

~ BG

On Nov 23, 9:52*pm, BradGuth wrote:

Sam is too smart for himself.

Gravity bends the flow of photons. *However, in 3D space, which was
are those photons or quantum string like things moving?

This is 2 photons moving in proximity with each other. The angles
measured in the bottommost label are the difference between the 2
photons relative to the Sun.

On Nov 23, 8:55*pm, philippeb8 wrote:
On Nov 23, 5:55*pm, PD wrote:



And Newton's 2nd law accepts the presence of equilibrium and
nonequilibrium, the presence of friction and the absence of friction,
the presence of linear motion and the presence of nonlinear motion,
the presence of constant acceleration and the presence of nonconstant
acceleration.

What's your point?

PD confuses subjective experiments to the fundamental structure of the
Universe.

What's subjective about presence of equilibrium and nonequilibrium?
What's subjective about the presence of friction and the absence of
friction?

What's your point?


I forgot mentioning dark matter and time travel in the past which are
both allowed and disallowed according Einstein.

On Nov 24, 6:56*am, PD wrote:

What's subjective about presence of equilibrium and nonequilibrium?
What's subjective about the presence of friction and the absence of
friction?

What's your point?

PD is in an attempt obfuscating clear evidence GR is an art.

Sam Wormley wrote:

Phil, you really know how to fool yourself.

Disprove FR Sam!