FR Bending of Light

I have correctly implemented the bending of light calculations
according to Finite Relativism. The perihelion precession of Mercury
remains constant (2.49e-7 rad/cycle) like it was demonstrated before
and the discrepancy of the bending of light is of the order of 1e-7
rad!
http://www.fornux.com/personal/philippe/fr/fr.exe

The discrepancy found in 1919 was of 4.2e-6 rad:
http://web.mit.edu/6.055/notes/bending-of-light.pdf

I do not use the same conditions but we can already see its order to
be of the same magnitude.


-Phil

Dear philippeb8:

On Nov 23, 10:21*am, philippeb8 wrote:
The
perihelion precession of Mercury remains
constant (2.49e-7 rad/cycle) like it was
demonstrated before and the discrepancy of the
bending of light is of the order of 1e-7
rad!
do not download executables from anyone you cannot collect damages
from if they screw up your computer

Why do you insist on providing a virus / trojan transmission conduit
as proof that you don't know what you are talking about?

David A. Smith

On Nov 23, 9:30*am, dlzc wrote:
Dear philippeb8:

do not download executables from anyone you cannot collect damages
from if they screw up your computer

David missed the part when I said viruses is a fraud and consequently
I wouldn't put my name on it if there was any. If you don't believe
me then here's AVIs:
http://www.fornux.com/personal/philippe/fr/fr-lb.avi
http://www.fornux.com/personal/philippe/fr/fr-pp.avi

Why do you insist on providing a virus / trojan transmission conduit
as proof that you don't know what you are talking about?

How do you explain I get answers and you don't?

philippeb8 wrote:

On Nov 23, 9:30 am, dlzc wrote:
Dear philippeb8:

do not download executables from anyone you cannot collect damages
from if they screw up your computer

David missed the part when I said viruses is a fraud and consequently
I wouldn't put my name on it if there was any. If you don't believe
me then here's AVIs:
http://www.fornux.com/personal/philippe/fr/fr-lb.avi
http://www.fornux.com/personal/philippe/fr/fr-pp.avi

Why do you insist on providing a virus / trojan transmission conduit
as proof that you don't know what you are talking about?

How do you explain I get answers and you don't?

Except you get wrong answers. Why are you bragging about getting wrong
answers, Phil?

On Nov 23, 11:17*am, eric gisse wrote:

Except you get wrong answers. Why are you bragging about getting wrong
answers, Phil?

Now Doug being banned from Google uses Eric's account.

Those are approximations close enough to the real answers.

philippeb8 wrote:

On Nov 23, 11:17 am, eric gisse wrote:

Except you get wrong answers. Why are you bragging about getting wrong
answers, Phil?

Now Doug being banned from Google uses Eric's account.

That is both grammatically and factually incorrect. Nice.


Those are approximations close enough to the real answers.

That's a fancy way of saying you are still wrong and don't care.

On Nov 23, 12:22*pm, philippeb8 wrote:
On Nov 23, 9:30*am, dlzc wrote:

Dear philippeb8:

do not download executables from anyone you cannot collect damages
from if they screw up your computer

David missed the part when I said viruses is a fraud and consequently
I wouldn't put my name on it if there was any. *If you don't believe
me then here's AVIs:http://www.fornux.com/personal/phili...e/fr/fr-pp.avi

Why do you insist on providing a virus / trojan transmission conduit
as proof that you don't know what you are talking about?

How do you explain I get answers and you don't?

What answers do you think you get that GR doesn't?

On Nov 23, 3:12*pm, PD wrote:

What answers do you think you get that GR doesn't?

GR is an art because it's validity is left to the interpreter. It
both accepts and rejects wormholes, parallel universes and a
cosmological constant.

"All religions, arts and sciences are branches of the same tree." --
Albert Einstein

On Nov 23, 6:08*pm, philippeb8 wrote:
On Nov 23, 3:12*pm, PD wrote:



What answers do you think you get that GR doesn't?

GR is an art because it's validity is left to the interpreter.

??

*It
both accepts and rejects wormholes, parallel universes and a
cosmological constant.

And Newton's 2nd law accepts the presence of equilibrium and
nonequilibrium, the presence of friction and the absence of friction,
the presence of linear motion and the presence of nonlinear motion,
the presence of constant acceleration and the presence of nonconstant
acceleration.

What's your point?


"All religions, arts and sciences are branches of the same tree." --
Albert Einstein

philippeb8 wrote:

On Nov 23, 3:12 pm, PD wrote:

What answers do you think you get that GR doesn't?

GR is an art because it's validity is left to the interpreter. It
both accepts and rejects wormholes, parallel universes and a
cosmological constant.

"All religions, arts and sciences are branches of the same tree." --
Albert Einstein

Making **** up again, Phil?