|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers)
On or about Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:21:52 -0800 (PST), Tom Merkle made the sensational claim that:
Fox can't help it that liberals see any middle position as 'conservative,' which I suppose it is compared to the left wing slant that CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, and MSNBC have been spewing for years. And most conservatives see that middle position as 'liberal'. If one considers oneself liberal, and someone says something one doesn't agree with, why must one immediately[1] label that person "conservative"? I, for one, am tired of getting blasted as either because my opinions are not so monolithic as most people. Many studies have documented this bias on political coverage, especially with regard to word choice and segment selection. Real actual studies on a subjective topic? Can you please cite at least one, I'd love to see such a beast. [1] I just learned to spell that word today. F**king *FINALLY*. -- This is a siggy | To E-mail, do note | Just because something It's properly formatted | who you mean to reply-to | is possible, doesn't No person, none, care | and it will reach me | mean it can happen |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers)
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:28:50 -0800 (PST), in a place far, far away,
(Kathy Rages) made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: In article , Rand Simberg wrote: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,111160,00.html Nitpick: Dwayne Day was on the Columbia AIB, not Challenger. Gaaahhhh! Thanks. I'll see if I can get it fixed. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. NewHeavy lift launchers)
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers
Kim Keller writes:
The most efficient way to salvo launch is to assemble vehicles (ideally with payloads) off-pad in an assembly building, then scoot 'em and shoot 'em off of one or two pads. An extra one or two VIF bays could turn SLC 41 into a salvo launcher. We priced that option this past summer. Even that ain't cheap. Can you tell us approximately how much? Will McLean |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers
"McLean1382" wrote in message ... Can you tell us approximately how much? Alas, no. But there were a significant amount of zeros... -Kim- |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers
"Magnus Redin" wrote in message ... What is the rough number of employees for different parts of the shuttle system? I can only speak to the situation at KSC, where roughly 7000 people work on Shuttle in some way, shape or form. Needed for a fairly simple shuttle-c: External tank handling equipment and staff. SRB handling and staff. Stacking equipment and staff. Vab, crawler, launchpad and misc building maintainance and support staff. Hmmm, maybe 300? Depends on how many shifts of operations you want to run; I'm thinking two shifts. I'm also adding some engineers into that, but not typical administrative overhead. New staff for a fairly simple shuttle-c: RS-68 engine specialists. Boat tail specilists, inertial system and avionics. ( TLI stage specialists are needed in any choice of launchers. ) 100-150, including engineers. Made redundant: Shuttle orbiter specialists, OMS, RCS, thermal protection, enviromental systems, shuttle arm, ET-orbiter separation system, landing gear, etc, etc. Emergency airfield staff, orbiter landing staff, orbiter handling equipment, orbiter transport 747:s. How much of the total manpower is used for the orbiter? 75% or is it more? Much less. Maybe 17% - perhaps 1000? There would be a need for logistics people, schedulers, trainers, and other misc. footsoldiers. Bear in mind these numbers are for the launch site only. -Kim- |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers)
Tom Merkle wrote:
Did you know that CNN, ABC, and Newsweek ALL had the exact same information for TWO WEEKS prior to the story Drudge 'broke' on Monica Lewinski? Boy, I remember how well that whole thing went for the Republicans; not only did the impeachment proceedings make them look like a bunch of completely clueless jerks, but Clinton stiffed them when they wanted him to resign, and they ended up with both Henry Hyde and Robert Livingstone in deep doo-doo in the wildly entertaining "infidelity of the week" scandals. And now there is a rumor about Kerry and an intern; I wonder how _this_ will all play out? With their "friends" being the human equivalent of sharks in a feeding frenzy, they never need to worry about the Democrats being the the primary threat to their success. That threat shall always be residing in their own right wing. Pat |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers)
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 21:34:09 -0800 (PST), in a place far, far away,
Pat Flannery made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: And now there is a rumor about Kerry and an intern; I wonder how _this_ will all play out? That's more likely coming from a Democrat camp. If it were Republicans, they'd have waited until October, not now, when the primary's still at least theoretically in play. If I had to put money on it, I'd say this has Lehane's fingerprints on it. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers)
Rand Simberg wrote:
And now there is a rumor about Kerry and an intern; I wonder how _this_ will all play out? That's more likely coming from a Democrat camp. If it were Republicans, they'd have waited until October, not now, when the primary's still at least theoretically in play. If I had to put money on it, I'd say this has Lehane's fingerprints on it. That's what Rush thinks; but I'd put my money of Matt Drudge being unable to keep his mouth shut for more than one minute after hearing a rumor. If Lehane's involved in this, it's very puzzling- as he was Clark's press secretary, and Clark is expected to endorse Kerry later today. Pat |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers)
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:17:26 -0800 (PST), in a place far, far away,
Pat Flannery made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: That's more likely coming from a Democrat camp. If it were Republicans, they'd have waited until October, not now, when the primary's still at least theoretically in play. If I had to put money on it, I'd say this has Lehane's fingerprints on it. That's what Rush thinks I wouldn't know... but I'd put my money of Matt Drudge being unable to keep his mouth shut for more than one minute after hearing a rumor. If Lehane's involved in this, it's very puzzling- as he was Clark's press secretary, and Clark is expected to endorse Kerry later today. Clark was the one who said that Kerry might have an intern problem a few days ago. Here's something interesting. It was scooped by a blogger a few days ago. http://www.watchblog.com/thirdparty/...es/000780.html It turns out that this isn't just any blogger. It was on a blog run by this guy: http://www.camworld.com/about/ Who works for this guy: http://www.usatoday.com/tech/webguid...larkblog_x.htm Mysteriouser and mysteriouser, eh? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA's X-43A flight results in treasure trove of data | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 7th 04 06:42 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 2nd 04 12:01 AM |
High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers | Cris Fitch | Technology | 40 | March 24th 04 04:28 PM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
Space Station Crew & Students Are 'Partners In Flight' | Ron Baalke | Space Station | 0 | December 16th 03 09:09 PM |