|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is past and present part of Universe + Now ?
To Ya All How can you leave out"NOW" to me its more important than past
or present . NOW is the immediate past. Now is the immediate present. We live from now to then(from time to time. Now ain't that reality I see now as the most important Planck time. Bert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is past and present part of Universe + Now ?
On Oct 16, 8:09*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
To Ya All How can you leave out"NOW" to me its more important than past or present . NOW is the immediate past. Now is the immediate present. We live from now to then(from time to time. Now ain't that reality * * I see now as the most important Planck time. *Bert In other words, nothing really matters because the future is now and the right here and now is already the past that's always going to be interpreted and recorded by the victors of this era, so why bother with seeking the truth, and instead just go with the flow is your failsafe personal policy. As far as our purely objective terrestrial matters; ”Whoever controls the past, controls the future” / George Orwell, is apparently good to go as is. But then you don't believe there's ever anything wrong with or otherwise undisclosed about the past (such as those one and only agencies within our faith-based government that supposedly haven't told us lies or having withheld public funded science, being DARPA and NASA), so therefore nothing much really matters because,”Whoever controls the past, controls the future” is still perfectly okay with your mindset, even though actual truths may be quite different. ~ BG |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Is past and present part of Universe + Now ?
BG Who controls "NOW" controls the future. Bert
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Is past and present part of Universe + Now ?
On Oct 17, 12:43*pm, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
BG Who controls "NOW" controls the future. Bert And who might that be, as based upon their public funded past and of whomever has been subsequently kept in charge, whereas apparently there's not a kosher faith-based soul on Earth that has ever told you a lie or having obfuscated/excluded a damn thing. Doesn't it seem the least bit odd, that out of all those Apollo missions (including those supposed 6 missions of having walked upon our physically dark moon) that hardly if any mention of all that sodium got noticed. Is sodium really that hard of a raw element to detect? (the relatively little LCROSS impactor plume was primarily saturated with sodium) I agree with you, that there's damn little if any ppm of h2o, unless we're talking about drilling deep into that robust basalt crust. (similar to having only deep underground water, if hardly any associated with Mars) Do those laws of physics really function differently while on the moon? (according to our Apollo missions, apparently so) As perhaps otherwise something like the newish planet of Venus and even our physically dark Selene/moon that may have belonged to Sirius B, with conceivably our Venus having been what those Dogon implied as Sirius C was perhaps not actually that of any third star, and otherwise the remaining Sirius star system wobble being caused by whatever Sirius D of .057 Ms (roughly 60 Mj) represents their true origin of where the geologically newish Venus and our Selene/moon came from either Sirius B or conceivably Sirius D that may have been a third star. At this juncture we simply have too many unknowns and little if any talent or resources focused upon the nearby Sirius star/solar system, so for the moment there’s no objective proof-positive either way. http://www.icr.org/article/3394/ “Using experimentally-determined diffusion coefficients for hydration of olivine, water diffusion profiles were calculated for all three crystallographic axes of an olivine grain at a temperature of 1245±45ºC for various durations, with an initial water content of ~312 weight parts per million (wt ppm) and a final water content of 0 wt ppm at its rim. Thus it was possible to approximate the ascent rate of the mantle xenoliths and, by extension, their host basalt. The calculated ascent rates ranged from 1.9 hours at 1290ºC to 3.4 hours at 1245ºC and 6.3 hours at 1200ºC. Furthermore, FTIR analyses across cracks in the olivine grains did not exhibit any perturbations of the hydrogen profiles, so hydrogen diffusion from the grain rims occurred predominantly prior to the cracking of the grains near the earth's surface or after the eruption of the host basalt. Therefore, these mantle xenoliths must have reached the earth's surface in a matter of only several hours.” What part of zero ppm (“water content of 0 wt ppm at its rim”) do we still not fully understand, and try to remember that this crystal dry lunar environment is offering a near ideal vacuum, and even originally its surface shouldn’t have offered at most more then 0.1 bar unless it was covered in a thick layer of ice (as otherwise it’s not exactly solid or much less liquid h2o friendly). If there’s any surface basalt as loose rock and dust that contains water, unless it were otherwise deposited by meteors and comets, as such would tend to impose and/or reinforce my ongoing interpretation that our Selene/moon was once upon a time covered by a very thick layer of ice. As otherwise there shouldn’t but few if any ppm worth of water to behold unless going deep, because the element or molecule water needs pressure in order to coexist within basalt, and unfortunately the one common thing our Selene/moon doesn’t offer is pressure. So, unless we’re talking about going several km deep into that thick and robust crust, there’s not going to bel all that much h2o to behold. If our moon were made extensively of Earth, then it’s crust and surface of lose rock and dust should be similar in measurable ways to that of terrestrial basalts. http://bulletin.geoscienceworld.org/...ract/85/9/1485 “Chlorine, Sulfur, and Water in Magmas and Oceans” However, it seems our currently naked Selene/moon is one of considerable sodium and otherwise saturated and/or deposited in many other unusually dark and heavy elements, including UV reactive minerals, as well as those even heavier elements of radioactive and their unavoidable secondary isotopes. So, where’s the other 99.9% of our spendy LRO and LCROSS science that obviously does not necessarily support our previous Apollo science or mission physics? ~ BG |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Is past and present part of Universe + Now ?
On Oct 17, 4:26*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Oct 17, 12:43*pm, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote: BG Who controls "NOW" controls the future. Bert And who might that be, as based upon their public funded past and of whomever has been subsequently kept in charge, whereas apparently there's not a kosher faith-based soul on Earth that has ever told you a lie or having obfuscated/excluded a damn thing. Doesn't it seem the least bit odd, that out of all those Apollo missions (including those supposed 6 missions of having walked upon our physically dark moon) that hardly if any mention of all that sodium got noticed. *Is sodium really that hard of a raw element to detect? (the relatively little LCROSS impactor plume was primarily saturated with sodium) I agree with you, that there's damn little if any ppm of h2o, unless we're talking about drilling deep into that robust basalt crust. (similar to having only deep underground water, if hardly any associated with Mars) Do those laws of physics really function differently while on the moon? (according to our Apollo missions, apparently so) *As perhaps otherwise something like the newish planet of Venus and even our physically dark Selene/moon that may have belonged to Sirius B, with conceivably our Venus having been what those Dogon implied as Sirius C was perhaps not actually that of any third star, and otherwise the remaining Sirius star system wobble being caused by whatever Sirius D of .057 Ms (roughly 60 Mj) represents their true origin of where the geologically newish Venus and our Selene/moon came from either Sirius B or conceivably Sirius D that may have been a third star. *At this juncture we simply have too many unknowns and little if any talent or resources focused upon the nearby Sirius star/solar system, so for the moment there’s no objective proof-positive either way. http://www.icr.org/article/3394/ *“Using experimentally-determined diffusion coefficients for hydration of olivine, water diffusion profiles were calculated for all three crystallographic axes of an olivine grain at a temperature of 1245±45ºC for various durations, with an initial water content of ~312 weight parts per million (wt ppm) and a final water content of 0 wt ppm at its rim. Thus it was possible to approximate the ascent rate of the mantle xenoliths and, by extension, their host basalt. The calculated ascent rates ranged from 1.9 hours at 1290ºC to 3.4 hours at 1245ºC and 6.3 hours at 1200ºC. Furthermore, FTIR analyses across cracks in the olivine grains did not exhibit any perturbations of the hydrogen profiles, so hydrogen diffusion from the grain rims occurred predominantly prior to the cracking of the grains near the earth's surface or after the eruption of the host basalt. Therefore, these mantle xenoliths must have reached the earth's surface in a matter of only several hours.” What part of zero ppm (“water content of 0 wt ppm at its rim”) do we still not fully understand, and try to remember that this crystal dry lunar environment is offering a near ideal vacuum, and even originally its surface shouldn’t have offered at most more then 0.1 bar unless it was covered in a thick layer of ice (as otherwise it’s not exactly solid or much less liquid h2o friendly). If there’s any surface basalt as loose rock and dust that contains water, unless it were otherwise deposited by meteors and comets, as such would tend to impose and/or reinforce my ongoing interpretation that our Selene/moon was once upon a time covered by a very thick layer of ice. *As otherwise there shouldn’t but few if any ppm worth of water to behold unless going deep, because the element or molecule water needs pressure in order to coexist within basalt, and unfortunately the one common thing our Selene/moon doesn’t offer is pressure. *So, unless we’re talking about going several km deep into that thick and robust crust, there’s not going to bel all that much h2o to behold. If our moon were made extensively of Earth, then it’s crust and surface of lose rock and dust should be similar in measurable ways to that of terrestrial basalts. *http://bulletin.geoscienceworld.org/...ract/85/9/1485 *“Chlorine, Sulfur, and Water in Magmas and Oceans” However, it seems our currently naked Selene/moon is one of considerable sodium and otherwise saturated and/or deposited in many other unusually dark and heavy elements, including UV reactive minerals, as well as those even heavier elements of radioactive and their unavoidable secondary isotopes. So, where’s the other 99.9% of our spendy LRO and LCROSS science that obviously does not necessarily support our previous Apollo science or mission physics? *~ BG With heavy metals being found on the surface of the moon, it has been suggested that at some previous time the moon was mined. The question should be, who did the mining? RT |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Is past and present part of Universe + Now ?
On Oct 18, 6:38*am, vtcapo wrote:
On Oct 17, 4:26*pm, BradGuth wrote: On Oct 17, 12:43*pm, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote: BG Who controls "NOW" controls the future. Bert And who might that be, as based upon their public funded past and of whomever has been subsequently kept in charge, whereas apparently there's not a kosher faith-based soul on Earth that has ever told you a lie or having obfuscated/excluded a damn thing. Doesn't it seem the least bit odd, that out of all those Apollo missions (including those supposed 6 missions of having walked upon our physically dark moon) that hardly if any mention of all that sodium got noticed. *Is sodium really that hard of a raw element to detect? (the relatively little LCROSS impactor plume was primarily saturated with sodium) I agree with you, that there's damn little if any ppm of h2o, unless we're talking about drilling deep into that robust basalt crust. (similar to having only deep underground water, if hardly any associated with Mars) Do those laws of physics really function differently while on the moon? (according to our Apollo missions, apparently so) *As perhaps otherwise something like the newish planet of Venus and even our physically dark Selene/moon that may have belonged to Sirius B, with conceivably our Venus having been what those Dogon implied as Sirius C was perhaps not actually that of any third star, and otherwise the remaining Sirius star system wobble being caused by whatever Sirius D of .057 Ms (roughly 60 Mj) represents their true origin of where the geologically newish Venus and our Selene/moon came from either Sirius B or conceivably Sirius D that may have been a third star. *At this juncture we simply have too many unknowns and little if any talent or resources focused upon the nearby Sirius star/solar system, so for the moment there’s no objective proof-positive either way. http://www.icr.org/article/3394/ *“Using experimentally-determined diffusion coefficients for hydration of olivine, water diffusion profiles were calculated for all three crystallographic axes of an olivine grain at a temperature of 1245±45ºC for various durations, with an initial water content of ~312 weight parts per million (wt ppm) and a final water content of 0 wt ppm at its rim. Thus it was possible to approximate the ascent rate of the mantle xenoliths and, by extension, their host basalt. The calculated ascent rates ranged from 1.9 hours at 1290ºC to 3.4 hours at 1245ºC and 6.3 hours at 1200ºC. Furthermore, FTIR analyses across cracks in the olivine grains did not exhibit any perturbations of the hydrogen profiles, so hydrogen diffusion from the grain rims occurred predominantly prior to the cracking of the grains near the earth's surface or after the eruption of the host basalt. Therefore, these mantle xenoliths must have reached the earth's surface in a matter of only several hours.” What part of zero ppm (“water content of 0 wt ppm at its rim”) do we still not fully understand, and try to remember that this crystal dry lunar environment is offering a near ideal vacuum, and even originally its surface shouldn’t have offered at most more then 0.1 bar unless it was covered in a thick layer of ice (as otherwise it’s not exactly solid or much less liquid h2o friendly). If there’s any surface basalt as loose rock and dust that contains water, unless it were otherwise deposited by meteors and comets, as such would tend to impose and/or reinforce my ongoing interpretation that our Selene/moon was once upon a time covered by a very thick layer of ice. *As otherwise there shouldn’t but few if any ppm worth of water to behold unless going deep, because the element or molecule water needs pressure in order to coexist within basalt, and unfortunately the one common thing our Selene/moon doesn’t offer is pressure. *So, unless we’re talking about going several km deep into that thick and robust crust, there’s not going to bel all that much h2o to behold. If our moon were made extensively of Earth, then it’s crust and surface of lose rock and dust should be similar in measurable ways to that of terrestrial basalts. *http://bulletin.geoscienceworld.org/...ract/85/9/1485 *“Chlorine, Sulfur, and Water in Magmas and Oceans” However, it seems our currently naked Selene/moon is one of considerable sodium and otherwise saturated and/or deposited in many other unusually dark and heavy elements, including UV reactive minerals, as well as those even heavier elements of radioactive and their unavoidable secondary isotopes. So, where’s the other 99.9% of our spendy LRO and LCROSS science that obviously does not necessarily support our previous Apollo science or mission physics? *~ BG With heavy metals being found on the surface of the moon, it has been suggested that at some previous time the moon was mined. The question should be, who did the mining? RT Perhaps that extremely unusual moon of ours used to belong to the planet Venus. Would you like to see and further discuss what they've done to a mountainous area of that geothermally toasty planet? ~ BG |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Is past and present part of Universe + Now ?
"vtcapo" wrote in message ... With heavy metals being found on the surface of the moon, it has been suggested that at some previous time the moon was mined. The question should be, who did the mining? Meteors. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Is past and present part of Universe + Now ?
On Oct 19, 10:35*am, "Nightcrawler" wrote:
"vtcapo" wrote in ... With heavy metals being found on the surface of the moon, it has been suggested that at some previous time the moon was mined. The question should be, who did the mining? Meteors. That unusual lunar surface is populated by somewhat impressive mascons, whereas meteors and/or asteroid impacts certainly could have contributed a few hundred teratonnes of those unusually heavy elements. (a little odd that we didn't get our fair share) ~ BG |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Is past and present part of Universe + Now ?
On Oct 18, 6:38*am, vtcapo wrote:
On Oct 17, 4:26*pm, BradGuth wrote: On Oct 17, 12:43*pm, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote: BG Who controls "NOW" controls the future. Bert And who might that be, as based upon their public funded past and of whomever has been subsequently kept in charge, whereas apparently there's not a kosher faith-based soul on Earth that has ever told you a lie or having obfuscated/excluded a damn thing. Doesn't it seem the least bit odd, that out of all those Apollo missions (including those supposed 6 missions of having walked upon our physically dark moon) that hardly if any mention of all that sodium got noticed. *Is sodium really that hard of a raw element to detect? (the relatively little LCROSS impactor plume was primarily saturated with sodium) I agree with you, that there's damn little if any ppm of h2o, unless we're talking about drilling deep into that robust basalt crust. (similar to having only deep underground water, if hardly any associated with Mars) Do those laws of physics really function differently while on the moon? (according to our Apollo missions, apparently so) *As perhaps otherwise something like the newish planet of Venus and even our physically dark Selene/moon that may have belonged to Sirius B, with conceivably our Venus having been what those Dogon implied as Sirius C was perhaps not actually that of any third star, and otherwise the remaining Sirius star system wobble being caused by whatever Sirius D of .057 Ms (roughly 60 Mj) represents their true origin of where the geologically newish Venus and our Selene/moon came from either Sirius B or conceivably Sirius D that may have been a third star. *At this juncture we simply have too many unknowns and little if any talent or resources focused upon the nearby Sirius star/solar system, so for the moment there’s no objective proof-positive either way. http://www.icr.org/article/3394/ *“Using experimentally-determined diffusion coefficients for hydration of olivine, water diffusion profiles were calculated for all three crystallographic axes of an olivine grain at a temperature of 1245±45ºC for various durations, with an initial water content of ~312 weight parts per million (wt ppm) and a final water content of 0 wt ppm at its rim. Thus it was possible to approximate the ascent rate of the mantle xenoliths and, by extension, their host basalt. The calculated ascent rates ranged from 1.9 hours at 1290ºC to 3.4 hours at 1245ºC and 6.3 hours at 1200ºC. Furthermore, FTIR analyses across cracks in the olivine grains did not exhibit any perturbations of the hydrogen profiles, so hydrogen diffusion from the grain rims occurred predominantly prior to the cracking of the grains near the earth's surface or after the eruption of the host basalt. Therefore, these mantle xenoliths must have reached the earth's surface in a matter of only several hours.” What part of zero ppm (“water content of 0 wt ppm at its rim”) do we still not fully understand, and try to remember that this crystal dry lunar environment is offering a near ideal vacuum, and even originally its surface shouldn’t have offered at most more then 0.1 bar unless it was covered in a thick layer of ice (as otherwise it’s not exactly solid or much less liquid h2o friendly). If there’s any surface basalt as loose rock and dust that contains water, unless it were otherwise deposited by meteors and comets, as such would tend to impose and/or reinforce my ongoing interpretation that our Selene/moon was once upon a time covered by a very thick layer of ice. *As otherwise there shouldn’t but few if any ppm worth of water to behold unless going deep, because the element or molecule water needs pressure in order to coexist within basalt, and unfortunately the one common thing our Selene/moon doesn’t offer is pressure. *So, unless we’re talking about going several km deep into that thick and robust crust, there’s not going to bel all that much h2o to behold. If our moon were made extensively of Earth, then it’s crust and surface of lose rock and dust should be similar in measurable ways to that of terrestrial basalts. *http://bulletin.geoscienceworld.org/...ract/85/9/1485 *“Chlorine, Sulfur, and Water in Magmas and Oceans” However, it seems our currently naked Selene/moon is one of considerable sodium and otherwise saturated and/or deposited in many other unusually dark and heavy elements, including UV reactive minerals, as well as those even heavier elements of radioactive and their unavoidable secondary isotopes. So, where’s the other 99.9% of our spendy LRO and LCROSS science that obviously does not necessarily support our previous Apollo science or mission physics? *~ BG With heavy metals being found on the surface of the moon, it has been suggested that at some previous time the moon was mined. The question should be, who did the mining? RT Hidden in plain site, the face of the Moon is pockmarked with open pit mines! Astronomers have mistakenly labeled them craters. Double-A |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Is past and present part of Universe + Now ?
On Oct 19, 12:32*pm, Double-A wrote:
On Oct 18, 6:38*am, vtcapo wrote: On Oct 17, 4:26*pm, BradGuth wrote: On Oct 17, 12:43*pm, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote: BG Who controls "NOW" controls the future. Bert And who might that be, as based upon their public funded past and of whomever has been subsequently kept in charge, whereas apparently there's not a kosher faith-based soul on Earth that has ever told you a lie or having obfuscated/excluded a damn thing. Doesn't it seem the least bit odd, that out of all those Apollo missions (including those supposed 6 missions of having walked upon our physically dark moon) that hardly if any mention of all that sodium got noticed. *Is sodium really that hard of a raw element to detect? (the relatively little LCROSS impactor plume was primarily saturated with sodium) I agree with you, that there's damn little if any ppm of h2o, unless we're talking about drilling deep into that robust basalt crust. (similar to having only deep underground water, if hardly any associated with Mars) Do those laws of physics really function differently while on the moon? (according to our Apollo missions, apparently so) *As perhaps otherwise something like the newish planet of Venus and even our physically dark Selene/moon that may have belonged to Sirius B, with conceivably our Venus having been what those Dogon implied as Sirius C was perhaps not actually that of any third star, and otherwise the remaining Sirius star system wobble being caused by whatever Sirius D of .057 Ms (roughly 60 Mj) represents their true origin of where the geologically newish Venus and our Selene/moon came from either Sirius B or conceivably Sirius D that may have been a third star. *At this juncture we simply have too many unknowns and little if any talent or resources focused upon the nearby Sirius star/solar system, so for the moment there’s no objective proof-positive either way. http://www.icr.org/article/3394/ *“Using experimentally-determined diffusion coefficients for hydration of olivine, water diffusion profiles were calculated for all three crystallographic axes of an olivine grain at a temperature of 1245±45ºC for various durations, with an initial water content of ~312 weight parts per million (wt ppm) and a final water content of 0 wt ppm at its rim. Thus it was possible to approximate the ascent rate of the mantle xenoliths and, by extension, their host basalt. The calculated ascent rates ranged from 1.9 hours at 1290ºC to 3.4 hours at 1245ºC and 6.3 hours at 1200ºC. Furthermore, FTIR analyses across cracks in the olivine grains did not exhibit any perturbations of the hydrogen profiles, so hydrogen diffusion from the grain rims occurred predominantly prior to the cracking of the grains near the earth's surface or after the eruption of the host basalt. Therefore, these mantle xenoliths must have reached the earth's surface in a matter of only several hours.” What part of zero ppm (“water content of 0 wt ppm at its rim”) do we still not fully understand, and try to remember that this crystal dry lunar environment is offering a near ideal vacuum, and even originally its surface shouldn’t have offered at most more then 0.1 bar unless it was covered in a thick layer of ice (as otherwise it’s not exactly solid or much less liquid h2o friendly). If there’s any surface basalt as loose rock and dust that contains water, unless it were otherwise deposited by meteors and comets, as such would tend to impose and/or reinforce my ongoing interpretation that our Selene/moon was once upon a time covered by a very thick layer of ice. *As otherwise there shouldn’t but few if any ppm worth of water to behold unless going deep, because the element or molecule water needs pressure in order to coexist within basalt, and unfortunately the one common thing our Selene/moon doesn’t offer is pressure. *So, unless we’re talking about going several km deep into that thick and robust crust, there’s not going to bel all that much h2o to behold. If our moon were made extensively of Earth, then it’s crust and surface of lose rock and dust should be similar in measurable ways to that of terrestrial basalts. *http://bulletin.geoscienceworld.org/...ract/85/9/1485 *“Chlorine, Sulfur, and Water in Magmas and Oceans” However, it seems our currently naked Selene/moon is one of considerable sodium and otherwise saturated and/or deposited in many other unusually dark and heavy elements, including UV reactive minerals, as well as those even heavier elements of radioactive and their unavoidable secondary isotopes. So, where’s the other 99.9% of our spendy LRO and LCROSS science that obviously does not necessarily support our previous Apollo science or mission physics? *~ BG With heavy metals being found on the surface of the moon, it has been suggested that at some previous time the moon was mined. The question should be, who did the mining? RT Hidden in plain site, the face of the Moon is pockmarked with open pit mines! *Astronomers have mistakenly labeled them craters. Double-A If the necessary technology existed, we'd only need a couple of relatively small entrances of a few meters each, especially it were mostly via robotics. Hiding such entrances would also be rather simple (at least in the visual monochrome version that also excluded all spectrums of UV fluorescence), especially if there's all that lose rock and electrostatic charged dust to work with. ~ BG |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is past and present part of Universe? | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 1 | October 13th 09 05:44 PM |
Past, Present and Future of the SCT | Rod Mollise | Amateur Astronomy | 64 | July 29th 03 03:36 PM |