A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The Black Hole in a Spatially Compact Spacetime



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 1st 05, 08:22 PM
brian a m stuckless
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Black Hole in a Spatially Compact Spacetime

[BH gps.wpd]; BLACK HOLE Blue Stars & accretion discs
GUESS BH observer to Blue Star AMBiENCE is assessed, as follows:

PREAMBLE: AMBiENT DENSiTY actually refracts VELOCiTY c.!!
VELOCiTY c is a MATHEMATiCAL constant, like pi.!!
You can ONLY c c CONSTANT ..in the EQUATiON, c.!!
The AMBiENT density CANNOT be addressed in GR-Tivity, so c
gets "PEGGED".!! Subsequent ERROR is SPACEtime CURVATURE.!!
[ This is the SAME SiTUATiON as with the PiONEER ANOMALY.!! ]

You will assume an ambient DENSiTY GRADiENT, as per the following;
( BLACK HOLE Blue Stars & accretion disc factor analysis ):

For GPS, this equation gives ATOMiC clock PREset FACTOR = _________
= (Very Low ~ BLUE STAR Orbit period tb) / (t1 - tb)
= BH observer radius AMBiENT density / STAR's orbital density d3
= (OBSERVERs ambient PARTiCLE COUNT/m^3) / STAR's orbital COUNT/m^3
= ( _________ molpart/m^3) / ( __________ molpart/m^3)
= (v1^2 - vb^2) / 2*c^2
= (rA*gA - r3*g3) / 2*c^2
= G*M1*[{1/(n1 - 1)*rA} - {1/(n3 - 1)*r3}] / c^2
(fA - fb) / fb
= [{G*M1 / {(n1 - 1)*rA}} - {G*M1 / {(n3 - 1)*r3}}] / c^2
= (Stuckless rS)*[{1 / (n1 - 1)*rA} - {1 / (n3 - 1)*r3}] / 2 .!!

1. Radii rA and r3 MORE relevant to BH BLUE STARs THAN velocity, vb.
2. CAViTY n=0 only & always in GR & Newton Tivity (BOTH no AMBiENT).
3. The BOTTOM line, of the above EQUATiON, is ALL you NEED to SOLVE.
4. The ABOVE equation gives --what would have to be the SYNONYMOUS
atomic-clock-PRE-set FACTOR for *NO ANOMALY*, at OBSERVER radius rA.

M1 = Mass of EARth (or SUN, Pioneer, BLACK HOLE's example, as here).
G = Gravitational Constant.
r3 = radius of STARs or rocket VLO. (or STAR orbit radius, as here).
rA = radius of orbiting clock's orbit. (..OBSERVERs DiSTANCE, here).
v1 = 2*pi*rA/t1 = orbital speed of orbiting OBSERVER. (..Etc ..etc).
vb = 2*pi*r3/t3 = speed of the EARth clock (BLACK HOLE frame).
v1^2 = rA*g = (vescape)^2 / 2*(n - 1) = G*M1 / (n - 1)*rA
[ m1*c/h=nL/wl=fL/c=pL/h=nA/2*pi*rA=eV/h*fA*rA=pA/h*rA ].!!

The GUESS ambient density is ADDRESSED, with (n - 1), as follows:
G*M1/(n - 1)=G*M1*m1/(mD - m1)=r1*v1^2=r1^2*g=nA*wl*v1^2/ 2*pi*nL
[ ..whe c = wl*f / nL = 2*pi*r1 / nA*tbob = 1 / Uo*Eo*c ].!!
1. Fine Structure VARiABLE (n - 1) = (mD - m1) / m1 ,..
..where mD is EQUiVALENT ambient DisCHARGE mass from m1
..and where (n) = mD / m1 ..provides the + or - sign.
2. For BLACK HOLE M1 each Blue Star, m1, has a CAViTiY n.
3. HERE the observer is on the OUTside of the BLUE STARs.
4. GUESS 3-d Stuckless rS was Schwartzchild radius in GR.

Go c WordPerfect file [BH gps.wpd] & c, pi-Like
Go c COSmic reLiEF U_o c GUESS nomenclature
Go c info itsy-bitsy bytes PLANCK TEMPERATURE .

BLACK HOLE blue star discs result DiRECTLY from factor c^2/f_b.
[ The GUESS Kinematic ViSCOSiTY & DiFFUSiON "ambience" FACTOR. ]

Typos, *ViSCOSiTY* & *assessed*, CORRECTED.!! Thanks Ken.!!
Physics USED TO BE hard, but GUESS simplified all THAT.!!

```Brian


Tom Roberts wrote:
Happy Hippy wrote:
Yes, we know that galactic centers are massive.
BUT They do not have the properties of
the Black Hole which is theorized to
create itself from its own gravity.


They emit hugely more than 'Hawking
Radiation'. They have a stupendous
magnetic field; the jets from some radio
galaxies are incredible- their fields
contain awesome power.

Yes. All from the accretion disk, not the black hole itself.
But the black hole's gravitational attraction is what drives
this enormous engine. A simple calculation shows that while
nuclear fusion can generate energies of a few MeV per nucleon,
black holes of the size observed in galactic centers gan
generate hundreds of MeV per nucleon in their accretion disks.

Tom Roberts


Ken S. Tucker wrote:
Hi Brian, noticed you've been postin' for
awhile. I think the grammar of your posts
is hard to read. Physics is hard, I'll
suggest a specific clear paragraph others
can respond to, otherwise your posts are
much to complicated by syntax.
Regards
Ken S. Tucker


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How much has the entropy of the universe increased? dkomo Astronomy Misc 26 July 2nd 05 08:11 PM
The Future of Physics and the World [email protected] Astronomy Misc 0 April 3rd 05 12:37 AM
NASA HISTORY COMPUTER STOLDEN --- UNIVERSAL DATABASE ON A CHIP .... zetasum History 1 February 19th 05 06:08 PM
Can't get out of the universe "My crew will blow it up"!!!!!!!!!!! zetasum Space Station 0 February 4th 05 11:10 PM
Black hole question.... NS> Solar 8 August 10th 03 08:15 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.