|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Solar gravity cell spins at 72.5 days for 1 revolution; Modern dayAntikythera Mechanism Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1473 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
This math is bothering me, so let me try to nail it.
We have the problem of the force of gravity. There is no problem if the Sun had 0 speed, but the Sun is 220 km/sec, far faster than any of its planets and so there is a huge problem. To solve the problem, we need the force of gravity to be EM-gravity with Space itself having been formed by gravity and then, that newly formed space to have a spin. So, now, how to work out the spin. We go to the planet most close to the Sun, which is Mercury. Now there would be no problem if the planets had their orbital speeds plus tacked on a 220km/sec. Thus, Mercury would be alright if its true speed were 267km/sec rather than 220km/sec. So that if Mercury and the Sun were moving in a straight line and at a distance apart of 0.4AU in Euclidean Space that they would be the orbits we know of today. However, Mercury is not moving at a 267km/sec speed in Space. So, we have elliptical geometry Space and this space has a spin. So what measure of a spin of Space so that 47km/sec is required to go around the Sun moving at 220km/sec. Now one complete revolution of Mercury is 88 days. So how much of a spin is required of this Elliptical geometry Space to carry the Mercury planet around at 47km/sec, around the Sun moving at 220km/sec. So, now, if the Space was spinning at 88 days for one complete revolution, then the planet Mercury need go 0km/sec and it would be making 1 complete orbit. But Mercury is not going at 0 km/sec but rather at 47km/sec. So, I think the ratio I need to build on is this ratio: 88 267 X 220 And now, cross multiplying I get 88x220 = 267X And solving for X, I get 19360/267 = 72.5. So the rotation for one complete revolution of the Solar gravity-cell is that of 72.5 days. So when I did this last night and came up with 70 days, I was more correct than in the next day thinking it had to be 110 days. Now the other worry was how would a spinning of the Solar gravity cell fix the revolution of Earth at 29km/sec or the revolution of Jupiter at 13 km/sec? It is solid body rotation of the Solar Gravity Cell, but it takes 1 complete turn of 72.5 days to fix Mercury at 47km/sec and 88 days. It takes 3 or more complete turns of the Solar Gravity Cell to render Venus and 5 or more complete turns to render Earth of its 29km and 1 year full revolution and takes about 60 or more Cell complete spins to render Jupiter of its 13km/sec and its 11.8 years. Now the spinning of the Solar Gravity Cell is solid body rotation, but the orbits of the planets is not solid body rotation. The orbits of the planets are "aided or helped out along their path, by the spinning of the Sun's gravity cell." So if Michael Wright were to be so kind as to build a Antikythera Mechanism that is heliocentric and which has the Sun depicted as a linear forward motion of 220km/sec, then to counterbalance that motion a gear wheel has to be engineered so that it makes the entire Solar Ecliptic revolve one complete circuit in 72.5 days. Hopefully I got it correct now. On issues so complex as astro body motion, we often mistake one side for the other side, we get 70 and then think it wrong and get 110, and finally we go back to the 70 (72.5). Now Gravity Cells would solve many other problems and questions in astronomy. Earlier today I wrote that pulsars are likely to be two nearby gravity cells pushing on one another as a Faraday law and producing a pulsed radio signal. Gravity Cells also solve the question of redshift of stars and galaxies, because of the high degree of bent space, that light traveling through the bent space is shifted by diffraction or refraction into the red wavelengths. So that the Shapley concentrate of galaxies may actually be a close by neighbor of the Milky Way. Gravity Cells also allow us to unravel the mystery of the morphology and evolution of galaxies, that they are all ball shaped once we include the gravity cell with the galactic plane of the galaxy. And Gravity Cells solves the question of where galaxies are locating in the mapping of the Universe. And I am delighted to say that the galaxies are spaced very evenly and uniformly, much like a fruit tree orchard of evenly spaced trees in rows. -- A Google author archive search for AP reveals massive vandalism starting May 
2012 where only one or two posts per month survive, whereas another poster David Bernier, all his posts continue to be author-archived. 
A Google search of just Archimedes Plutonium reveals massive search-engine-bombing, and likely the reason for wanting to destroy the author-archive of AP. 
If we listen to the 
excuse-fool Jeff Relf: Google Groups is 100% uncensored, so it isn't fully indexed. Were Google Groups fully indexed, it'd be used to game the system; We would think all posters have some of their posts missing in the author archive, but apparently only AP is targeted for deletions of his author archive posts. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair author- archiving of AP posts for the past several years as seen he http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986 Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Solar gravity cell spins at 72.5 days for 1 revolution; Modernday Antikythera Mechanism Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1473 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
On Apr 6, 12:33*am, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote: This math is bothering me, so let me try to nail it. We have the problem of the force of gravity. There is no problem if the Sun had 0 speed, but the Sun is 220 km/sec, far faster than any of its planets and so there is a huge problem. To solve the problem, we need the force of gravity to be EM-gravity with Space itself having been formed by gravity and then, that newly formed space to have a spin. So, now, how to work out the spin. We go to the planet most close to the Sun, which is Mercury. Now there would be no problem if the planets had their orbital speeds plus tacked on a 220km/sec. Thus, Mercury would be alright if its true speed were 267km/sec rather than 220km/sec. Sorry, thinking faster than my typing. that should read 47km/sec not 220 since Mercury is 47. Changed it on my original. I sincerely hope Michael Wright, the UK engineer on the NOVA show Ancient Computer can build a device which has a Solar Gravity cell of 72.5 day spin on the entire Solar Ecliptic Plane of planets. AP |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
quasars are easily solved in EM-gravity Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells#1474 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
On Apr 6, 12:33Â*am, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote: (snipped) Now Gravity Cells would solve many other problems and questions in astronomy. Earlier today I wrote that pulsars are likely to be two nearby gravity cells pushing on one another as a Faraday law and producing a pulsed radio signal. Gravity Cells also solve the question of redshift of stars and galaxies, because of the high degree of bent space, that light traveling through the bent space is shifted by diffraction or refraction into the red wavelengths. So that the Shapley concentrate of galaxies may actually be a close by neighbor of the Milky Way. Gravity Cells also allow us to unravel the mystery of the morphology and evolution of galaxies, that they are all ball shaped once we include the gravity cell with the galactic plane of the galaxy. And Gravity Cells solves the question of where galaxies are locating in the mapping of the Universe. And I am delighted to say that the galaxies are spaced very evenly and uniformly, much like a fruit tree orchard of evenly spaced trees in rows. Now Quasars are easily solved in EM-gravity. In Old Physics, they were so rumdummy that they believed in Doppler redshift on light when even Hubble himself rejected Doppler redshift. A Doppler redshift on light violates Special Relativity and thus violates the Maxwell Equations. So when you are a rumdummy physicist or a rumdummy astronomer and see a object with a large redshift but with bright luminosity, you will call it a Quasar. But if you are a true physicist and a true astronomer, you reject Doppler redshift as a distance measure and see it only as a measure of Space curvature. So when you see a bright luminosity of a galaxy bulge or galactic center, you bypass the redshift and immediately conclude it is close by and nearby to the Milky Way. So, Quasars were figments of the imagination of physicists and astronomers gone berserk. Our schools can teach physicists and astronomers to pass quizzes and tests, but it seems none of our schools is good at teaching people how to think with logic. -- 
A Google author archive search for AP reveals massive vandalism starting May 
2012 where only one or two posts per month survive, whereas another poster David Bernier, all his posts continue to be author-archived. 
A Google search of just Archimedes Plutonium reveals 
massive search-engine-bombing, and likely the reason for wanting to 
destroy the author-archive of AP. 
If we listen to the excuse-fool 
Jeff Relf: Google Groups is 100% uncensored, so it isn't fully indexed. Were Google Groups fully indexed, it'd be used to game the system; We would think all posters have some of their posts missing in the author archive, but apparently only AP is targeted for deletions of his author archive posts. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair author- archiving of AP posts for the past several years as seen he http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986 Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom 
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
may have found a mechanism for Pulsar stars Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells#1472 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 6th 13 03:30 AM |
110 days for a complete Solar gravity cell rotation Chapt16.15Gravity Cells #1469 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 5th 13 06:08 PM |
Table of Resonances Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1455 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 3rd 13 08:10 PM |
Chapt16.15 Maxwell Equations with EM-gravity; Gravity-Cell; OrbitalResonance; Spin-Orbit-Coupling #1451 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 2nd 13 01:23 AM |
Gravity cells to patch up the Sun's 220km/sec Chapt16.14 mathematicsof the force of gravity #1446 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | March 31st 13 08:19 AM |