#1
|
|||
|
|||
Earths rotation
Okay, idle mind, too much time on my hands etc. But I was watching TV tonight,
and they were talking about air planes, 600mph, 12 hour flight to the mid-east and I got to wondering. What effect, if any, does the earths rotation have on air flight? My line of thought was this: If an object on earth is moving approximately 1,000 mph (if my math is right, the earth is APPROX. 24,000 miles in circumference and makes one revolution in 24 hours...) Why is it that once a plane lifts off the ground and starts flying east at 600 MPH, that it doesn't lose 400 MPH because of the speed difference. Or why is it tnat if the plane lifts off and flies west at 600 MPH, it doesn't cover 1600 miles in an hour, again, due to the speed of the earths rotation. Does my question even make sense? Is it like a rocket laucnhed from Canaveral, the extra 1,000 MPH boost just stays with the plane the whole trip? Just got wondering. Thanks for humoring me. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Earths rotation
On Jan 26, 7:06�am, Pat Flannery wrote:
wrote: Okay, idle mind, too much time on my hands etc. But I was watching TV tonight, and they were talking about air planes, 600mph, 12 hour flight to the mid-east and I got to wondering. What effect, if any, does the earths rotation have on air flight? My line of thought was this: If an object on earth is moving approximately 1,000 mph (if my math is right, the earth is APPROX. 24,000 miles in circumference and makes one revolution in 24 hours...) Why is it that once a plane lifts off the ground and starts flying east at 600 MPH, that it doesn't lose 400 MPH because of the speed difference. Because the winds its flying through move with the Earth's surface, at least till you get up near the Jet Streams. If they didn't, we would have a 1,000 mph wind blowing from the east all the time at the equator, which would be a entirely new way to cause deforestation of the Amazonian rain forest - by blowing it all over the Andes and into the Pacific Ocean. :-) �Or why is it tnat if the plane lifts off and flies west at 600 MPH, it doesn't cover 1600 miles in an hour, again, due to the speed of the earths rotation. Does my question even make sense? Is it like a rocket laucnhed from Canaveral, the extra 1,000 MPH boost just stays with the plane the whole trip? Just got wondering. Thanks for humoring me. Way back in the 1930's someone suggested making a huge passenger helicopter to fly straight up to high altitude and stay their motionless while the Earth's surface rotated enough underneath it for it to descend at its destination. Nice idea but it wouldn't work. On the other hand, the Jet Streams can add significant range to a aircraft if it's flying in their direction of movement, or hamper its range if it is flying against them:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_stream Pat yeah flew once phoenix to pittsburgh in half the normal time. but the first leg pittsburgh to phoenix took a couiple hours actual flying time extra all because of winds |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Earths rotation
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How common are Earths? | Ian Parker | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 6th 09 02:19 PM |
Co-orbiting Earths | Dan Tilque | Astronomy Misc | 28 | January 16th 05 10:23 PM |
earths axis | ¶ƒ | Misc | 0 | July 8th 04 02:44 PM |
Seeking New Earths? Look For Dust | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 23rd 04 03:27 AM |
Seeking New Earths? Look For Dust | Ron | Misc | 0 | February 23rd 04 03:27 AM |