|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Huygens' Titan Descent
In article .com,
"Impact9" wrote: JPL is reporting it made the landing and transmitted for 1.5 hours after impact. I am a bit puzzled why they only made the probe last the few short hours after it detached from cassini. They could of built a better battery when Voyager I is like 28 year and still going. I know it is like -300F and mechanical things won't operate long in that harsh environment. Assuming the probe could survive the environment it would of been nice to be able to tap it for everything possible. The issue is how long the orbiter is in range to relay data from Huygens to Earth. It's only a few hours, so a longer-life battery for Huygens would have been pointless. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"richard schumacher" wrote in message news:no-spam-
I am a bit puzzled why they only made the probe last the few short hours after it detached from cassini. They could of built a better battery when Voyager I is like 28 year and still going. I know it is like -300F and mechanical things won't operate long in that harsh environment. Assuming the probe could survive the environment it would of been nice to be able to tap it for everything possible. The issue is how long the orbiter is in range to relay data from Huygens to Earth. It's only a few hours, so a longer-life battery for Huygens would have been pointless. If that were the "only" reason then I would disagree. Cassini will be passing by Titan again in a few weeks. I would think they could have held data and then blasted it at the satellite each time it passed. However, as I understand it that is not really why they kept the life to only a few hours. I think it had more to do with just getting it down safely, the weight of the probe on Cassini, cost, and probably just the general expectation that conditions were not favorable to the life of the unit being long. Glenn |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Glenn Mulno" wrote:
"richard schumacher" wrote: I am a bit puzzled why they only made the probe last the few short hours after it detached from cassini. They could of built a better battery when Voyager I is like 28 year and still going. I know it is like -300F and mechanical things won't operate long in that harsh environment. Assuming the probe could survive the environment it would of been nice to be able to tap it for everything possible. The issue is how long the orbiter is in range to relay data from Huygens to Earth. It's only a few hours, so a longer-life battery for Huygens would have been pointless. If that were the "only" reason then I would disagree. Cassini will be passing by Titan again in a few weeks. I would think they could have held data and then blasted it at the satellite each time it passed. However, as I understand it that is not really why they kept the life to only a few hours. I think it had more to do with just getting it down safely, the weight of the probe on Cassini, cost, and probably just the general expectation that conditions were not favorable to the life of the unit being long. The Voyagers and Cassini itself receive electrical power from a Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (RTG). An RTG can provide electrical power to a robust suite of spacecraft systems for 20 years or more, but an RTG would have been way too heavy to install on the Huygens spacecraft. The Mars lander spacecrafts utilize solar cell panels to create electrical power which is stored in rechargable batteries, and Mars has very little cloud cover that would interfere with that system, and Mars' night is similar in length to Earth's; so that system is workable on Mars. Titan has a dense, hazy atmosphere, and even in the clear, the Saturn system is way too far from the Sun, making a solar power system to be infeasible (the solar panel system would have to be gargantuan). The Huygens spacecraft could not utilize an RTG or solar power, so it was limited to un-rechargable batteries, and given the number of instruments on board, battery capacity was limited to a matter of hours. -- Scott M. Kozel Highway and Transportation History Websites Virginia/Maryland/Washington, D.C. http://www.roadstothefuture.com Philadelphia and Delaware Valley http://www.pennways.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Glenn Mulno" wrote:
"richard schumacher" wrote: I am a bit puzzled why they only made the probe last the few short hours after it detached from cassini. They could of built a better battery when Voyager I is like 28 year and still going. I know it is like -300F and mechanical things won't operate long in that harsh environment. Assuming the probe could survive the environment it would of been nice to be able to tap it for everything possible. The issue is how long the orbiter is in range to relay data from Huygens to Earth. It's only a few hours, so a longer-life battery for Huygens would have been pointless. If that were the "only" reason then I would disagree. Cassini will be passing by Titan again in a few weeks. I would think they could have held data and then blasted it at the satellite each time it passed. However, as I understand it that is not really why they kept the life to only a few hours. I think it had more to do with just getting it down safely, the weight of the probe on Cassini, cost, and probably just the general expectation that conditions were not favorable to the life of the unit being long. The Voyagers and Cassini itself receive electrical power from a Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (RTG). An RTG can provide electrical power to a robust suite of spacecraft systems for 20 years or more, but an RTG would have been way too heavy to install on the Huygens spacecraft. The Mars lander spacecrafts utilize solar cell panels to create electrical power which is stored in rechargable batteries, and Mars has very little cloud cover that would interfere with that system, and Mars' night is similar in length to Earth's; so that system is workable on Mars. Titan has a dense, hazy atmosphere, and even in the clear, the Saturn system is way too far from the Sun, making a solar power system to be infeasible (the solar panel system would have to be gargantuan). The Huygens spacecraft could not utilize an RTG or solar power, so it was limited to un-rechargable batteries, and given the number of instruments on board, battery capacity was limited to a matter of hours. -- Scott M. Kozel Highway and Transportation History Websites Virginia/Maryland/Washington, D.C. http://www.roadstothefuture.com Philadelphia and Delaware Valley http://www.pennways.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Glenn Mulno" wrote: "richard schumacher" wrote in message news:no-spam- I am a bit puzzled why they only made the probe last the few short hours after it detached from cassini. They could of built a better battery when Voyager I is like 28 year and still going. I know it is like -300F and mechanical things won't operate long in that harsh environment. Assuming the probe could survive the environment it would of been nice to be able to tap it for everything possible. The issue is how long the orbiter is in range to relay data from Huygens to Earth. It's only a few hours, so a longer-life battery for Huygens would have been pointless. If that were the "only" reason then I would disagree. Cassini will be passing by Titan again in a few weeks. I would think they could have held data and then blasted it at the satellite each time it passed. However, as I understand it that is not really why they kept the life to only a few hours. I think it had more to do with just getting it down safely, the weight of the probe on Cassini, cost, and probably just the general expectation that conditions were not favorable to the life of the unit being long. A lifetime of weeks would have required nuclear heaters at least, and perhaps a nuclear thermal electric source as well. That means more mass, probably more then anyone wanted to pay to send. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Glenn Mulno wrote: However, as I understand it that is not really why they kept the life to only a few hours. I think it had more to do with just getting it down safely, the weight of the probe on Cassini, cost, and probably just the general expectation that conditions were not favorable to the life of the unit being long. A long surface life would have required, at the very least, an RTG, which would have run up the cost, mass, and various other complications quite a bit. Moreover, Huygens was planned and sold as primarily an *atmosphere* mission -- even the camera (which is a US contribution, incidentally) was optimized as much for cloud imaging and sunlight measurements as for surface pictures. -- "Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer -- George Herbert | |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I have another question. The one photo I have seen from the surface
(unprocessed?) seems to have plenty of light. I found this surprising and am assuming this was considered in the planning stage and the photo system is extra sensitive. (?) Any comments on the data size of the images. -- Detective Tom Polhaus: " Heavy. What is it?" Sam Spade: "The, uh, stuff that dreams are made of." "Glenn Mulno" wrote in message ... "richard schumacher" wrote in message news:no-spam- I am a bit puzzled why they only made the probe last the few short hours after it detached from cassini. They could of built a better battery when Voyager I is like 28 year and still going. I know it is like -300F and mechanical things won't operate long in that harsh environment. Assuming the probe could survive the environment it would of been nice to be able to tap it for everything possible. The issue is how long the orbiter is in range to relay data from Huygens to Earth. It's only a few hours, so a longer-life battery for Huygens would have been pointless. If that were the "only" reason then I would disagree. Cassini will be passing by Titan again in a few weeks. I would think they could have held data and then blasted it at the satellite each time it passed. However, as I understand it that is not really why they kept the life to only a few hours. I think it had more to do with just getting it down safely, the weight of the probe on Cassini, cost, and probably just the general expectation that conditions were not favorable to the life of the unit being long. Glenn |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
it still is one HUGE success. Monumental, really. Just too bad the major news
networks didnt even mention it or show a photo tonight. This sorry state of socially irresponsible affairs in the USA must end soon. Henry Spencer wrote: In article , Glenn Mulno wrote: However, as I understand it that is not really why they kept the life to only a few hours. I think it had more to do with just getting it down safely, the weight of the probe on Cassini, cost, and probably just the general expectation that conditions were not favorable to the life of the unit being long. A long surface life would have required, at the very least, an RTG, which would have run up the cost, mass, and various other complications quite a bit. Moreover, Huygens was planned and sold as primarily an *atmosphere* mission -- even the camera (which is a US contribution, incidentally) was optimized as much for cloud imaging and sunlight measurements as for surface pictures. -- "Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer -- George Herbert | |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
muldar wrote: it still is one HUGE success. Monumental, really. Just too bad the major news networks didnt even mention it or show a photo tonight. This sorry state of socially irresponsible affairs in the USA must end soon. That's what you get for getting your news from TV :-) NPR and BBC radio haev given it decent coverage so far, and it would supise me if they don't have more on NPR's Sunday AM hour. -- a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m Don't blame me. I voted for Gore. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Was the lack of an RTG on Huygens a political decision, or a true
engineering limitation? Scott M. Kozel wrote: The Huygens spacecraft could not utilize an RTG or solar power, so it was limited to un-rechargable batteries, and given the number of instruments on board, battery capacity was limited to a matter of hours. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parachuting to Titan | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 30th 04 11:31 PM |
ESA's Huygens Probe Set to Detach From Cassini Orbiter | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 22nd 04 12:41 AM |
UA's Cassini Scientists Ready for First Close Titan Flyby | er | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | October 26th 04 07:14 AM |
UA's Cassini Scientists Ready for First Close Titan Flyby | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 25th 04 08:35 PM |
New Detailed Images of Titan | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 1st 04 08:05 PM |