|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Of engines cargo etc
You know its almost as if they knew that engine would fail on launch, I've
seen no other reason why more cargo came back than went up, after all if you wanted a test of fail safe what better way to do it. I'm only joking but it was a coincidence...... I hope! Brian -- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Of engines cargo etc
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Of engines cargo etc
Grin, but it was very opportune.
Brian -- From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active "Jeff Findley" wrote in message ... In article , says... You know its almost as if they knew that engine would fail on launch, I've seen no other reason why more cargo came back than went up, after all if you wanted a test of fail safe what better way to do it. I'm only joking but it was a coincidence...... I hope! I *seriously* doubt this was planned. Jeff -- "the perennial claim that hypersonic airbreathing propulsion would magically make space launch cheaper is nonsense -- LOX is much cheaper than advanced airbreathing engines, and so are the tanks to put it in and the extra thrust to carry it." - Henry Spencer |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Of engines cargo etc
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ion engines | Raghar | Policy | 52 | August 29th 07 09:10 PM |
OMS pod engines | John H[_2_] | Space Shuttle | 4 | August 9th 07 11:29 PM |
O2/CH4 Engines on Titan | James Nicoll | Policy | 1 | January 23rd 05 07:53 AM |
Ion engines and He3 | Nick Hull | Space Shuttle | 6 | December 15th 04 06:56 PM |
Bussard ICF EXL engines | George | Technology | 6 | February 8th 04 07:44 PM |