|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor
A sustainable, containable, fusion reaction has already been built -- the
technology is suppressed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/...sti_id=6807354 http://www.climatetechnology.gov/lib...ions-2-2-1.pdf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor
In our last episode,
, the lovely and talented * broadcast on alt.politics: A sustainable, containable, fusion reaction has already been built -- the technology is suppressed. Exactly as quacks and cranks always say. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/...sti_id=6807354 http://www.climatetechnology.gov/lib...ions-2-2-1.pdf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power None of these links lead to anything that suggests that sustainable fusion reactions have been achieved. -- Lars Eighner -finger for geek code- http://www.io.com/~eighner/ "With a heavy dose of fear and violence, and a lot of money for projects, I think we can convince these people that we are here to help them" -- Lt. Col. Nathan Sassaman |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 22:39:44 -0500, Lars Eighner wrote:
In our last episode, , the lovely and talented * broadcast on alt.politics: A sustainable, containable, fusion reaction has already been built -- the technology is suppressed. Exactly as quacks and cranks always say. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/...sti_id=6807354 http://www.climatetechnology.gov/lib...ions-2-2-1.pdf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power None of these links lead to anything that suggests that sustainable fusion reactions have been achieved. Yes they do. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 00:01:46 -0400, "Dick Hertz (Hey, who's Dick Hertz?)"
wrote: snip Nice try, but no cigar. The cat's out of the bag. ........the facts remain that fusion technology is suppressed. And it's being suppressed by Bechtel Nevada who controls Groom Lake and the extraterrestrial saucer stored there. Bechtel Nevada is: Bechtel (oil) Lockheed (arms) Johnson Controls (autos) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor
"*" wrote in message ... A sustainable, containable, fusion reaction has already been built This part is true. It can be done, only the energy output is still significantly lower than the input. The idea is sound, though, and will most likely be realized eventually. -- the technology is suppressed. No it isn't. The fact that you can list three websites, two of which are ..gov sites, proves that it isn't. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/...sti_id=6807354 http://www.climatetechnology.gov/lib...ions-2-2-1.pdf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor
In our last episode,
, the lovely and talented Laura broadcast on alt.politics: "*" wrote in message ... A sustainable, containable, fusion reaction has already been built This part is true. It can be done, only the energy output is still significantly lower than the input. Then it isn't sustainable. It depends on continuing energy input. The idea is sound, though, and will most likely be realized eventually. -- the technology is suppressed. No it isn't. The fact that you can list three websites, two of which are .gov sites, proves that it isn't. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/...sti_id=6807354 http://www.climatetechnology.gov/lib...ions-2-2-1.pdf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power -- Lars Eighner -finger for geek code- http://www.io.com/~eighner/ "With a heavy dose of fear and violence, and a lot of money for projects, I think we can convince these people that we are here to help them" -- Lt. Col. Nathan Sassaman |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 00:09:20 -0500, Lars Eighner wrote:
Then it isn't sustainable. Yes it is. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor
"Lars Eighner" wrote in message ... In our last episode, , the lovely and talented Laura broadcast on alt.politics: "*" wrote in message ... A sustainable, containable, fusion reaction has already been built This part is true. It can be done, only the energy output is still significantly lower than the input. Then it isn't sustainable. It depends on continuing energy input. True. I must have missed the sustainable bit and concentrated on the containable bit :-) Sorry about that. The idea is sound, though, and will most likely be realized eventually. -- the technology is suppressed. No it isn't. The fact that you can list three websites, two of which are .gov sites, proves that it isn't. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/...sti_id=6807354 http://www.climatetechnology.gov/lib...ions-2-2-1.pdf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power -- Lars Eighner -finger for geek code- http://www.io.com/~eighner/ "With a heavy dose of fear and violence, and a lot of money for projects, I think we can convince these people that we are here to help them" -- Lt. Col. Nathan Sassaman |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor
"*" wrote in message ... On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 00:09:20 -0500, Lars Eighner wrote: Then it isn't sustainable. Yes it is. No, he's right. It isn't. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor
X-No Archive:Yes On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 22:39:44 -0500, Lars Eighner
wrote: In our last episode, , the lovely and talented * broadcast on alt.politics: A sustainable, containable, fusion reaction has already been built -- the technology is suppressed. Exactly as quacks and cranks always say. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/...sti_id=6807354 http://www.climatetechnology.gov/lib...ions-2-2-1.pdf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power None of these links lead to anything that suggests that sustainable fusion reactions have been achieved. Didn't I say that just a little while ago? Widdershins Dark Prince of the Kook Central Cabal (TINKCC) Evil Overlord blah, blah, blah You get the idea. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Our future as a species - Fermi Paradox revisted - Where they all are | william mook | Policy | 157 | November 19th 03 12:19 AM |
N by M Body Fusion | Charles Cagle | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 31st 03 11:30 PM |
New UK technology will make the first global X-ray map of the Moon(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 22nd 03 02:09 AM |