A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Chapter 11 Solid Body Rotation for galaxies only in Atom Totality,not Big Bang #430 Atom Totality 4th ed



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 17th 11, 09:17 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math
Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 858
Default Chapter 11 Solid Body Rotation for galaxies only in Atom Totality,not Big Bang #430 Atom Totality 4th ed

I need to expand on this solid body rotation that is often seen in
astronomy, whether galactic rotation of several galaxies or whether
globular-clusters of stars within a galaxy.

I do not think any physicist or astronomer ever considered the idea
that if galactic solid body rotation shows up as true data, that it
means the end of the Big Bang theory, for it cannot
support such motion.

The idea here is that if the universe is a result of a Big Bang
explosion, that solid body rotation is a contradiction, and that no
such motion should appear in a Big Bang explosion.

On the other hand, inside an atom we constantly run into concepts of
"spin" and spin angular momentum.

And so if the greatest single prediction of the Atom Totality versus
Big Bang theory were put up for question, the Atom Totality would
predict that 99.99% of the Cosmic mass is concentrated in a Cosmic
Nucleus, out of view of life living on pieces of the electron dot
cloud and that there would be solid body rotation of the electron dot
cloud. The Big Bang theory would never have
missing mass, nor the reality of solid body rotation. If we had a shot-
gun and fired it, we would never witness those BBs doing a solid body
rotation dance.

So I need to greatly expand the chapter of missing mass and solid body
rotation and get myself more informed on this topic.

Here are some first Google hits on galactic solid body rotation:

rotation curves - Astronomy Notes
Jun 9, 2010 ... A rigid body rotation is seen close to the center (as
if the ... The highest solid line in the left plot below is for all of
the galactic ...
www.astronomynotes.com/ismnotes/s7.htm - Cached - Similar
Oort constants - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
where V0 and R0 are the rotational velocity and distance to the
Galactic .... Solid body rotation assumes that the entire system is
moving as a ridged body ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oort_constants - Cached - Similar
Rotation Curves of Spiral Galaxies - Y. Sofue & V. Rubin
Logarithmic rotation curves of the Milky Way (thick line), NGC 4258
(thin ... was found to be in solid body rotation of the order of 100
km s-1 (Izumiura et al. .... Simulation of galactic-shock accretion of
nuclear gas disk in an oval ...
nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/Sept05/Sofue/Sofue4.html - Cached
The Astrophysics Spectator: The Local Motion of the Milky Way Galaxy
Aug 22, 2007 ... The stars in the Galactic disk move as a fluid. ...
and the Galactic disk would rotate like a solid body, with the
rotation velocity of the ...
http://www.astrophysicsspectator.com...LocalFlow.html - Cached -
Similar
Lecture 21 - Galactic Dynamics (4/6/99)
Apr 6, 1999 ... What is a rotation curve? What are Keplerian and solid
body rotation profiles? What is the LSR velocity around the galaxy?
Galactic Dynamics ...
www.nrao.edu/~smyers/courses/astro12/L21.html - Cached - Similar
[PDF] The Disk Rotation of the Milky Way Galaxy Kinematics of
Galactic ...
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
rapid increase in rotation speed over the first few hundred parsecs
from the galactic center (as for solid body rotation) to a maximum of
about 260 km/s, ...
www.csupomona.edu/~jis/1999/kong.pdf - Similar
[PDF] Rotation in the Galactic Disk Differential Rotation The Center
of ...
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
Physics 216 Introduction to Astrophysics. 34. Chapter 16. Rotation
in the Galactic Disk. Differential Rotation. Solid-Body. Rotation ...
www.physics.queensu.ca/~phys216/ch16C.pdf - Similar
Rotation Curves
Most galaxies have rotation curves that show solid body rotation in
the very center, following by a slowly rising or constant velocity
rotation in the outer ...
http://www.astro.cornell.edu/academi...ion_curves.htm - Cached -
Similar
[PDF] String theory explanation of galactic rotation.
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
by MD Roberts - 2010 - Related articles
Apr 13, 2010 ... Galactic rotation curves often exhibit speeds which
are a ... expected from solid body rotation where the rotation speed
increases with ...
arxiv.org/pdf/1003.1309 - Similar
[PPT] The Milky Way Galaxy
File Format: Microsoft Powerpoint - Quick View
Bulge a thick distribution of warm gas and stars around the galactic
center. ... Solid Body Rotation Curve Example: Merry-Go-Rounds ...
faculty.mwsu.edu/physics/jackie.dunn/phys1533/astro_lec13.ppt -
Similar

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
Ads
  #2  
Old May 17th 11, 07:29 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math
Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 858
Default Chapter 11 Solid Body Rotation for galaxies only in AtomTotality, not Big Bang #431 Atom Totality 4th ed

On May 17, 3:17*am, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote:
I need to expand on this solid body rotation that is often seen in
astronomy, whether galactic rotation of several galaxies or whether
globular-clusters of stars within a galaxy.


Alright, I really need to expand Solid Body Rotation in a big manner
in this book.
I think it is fair to say that Solid Body Rotation is an easy
parameter to measure
of astro bodies and that it is not burdened with alot of hidden
dubious assumptions.
That bodies are in view and have Solid Body Rotation are
straightforward observations
that can not be denied or doubted as most other astro observations.

And there appears to be two categories of Solid Body Rotation. There
is the galactic
level were several galaxies are in solid-body-rotation and then there
are stars called
globular clusters inside a single galaxy that have solid-body-
rotation.

Now it is the galactic solid body rotation that trashcans the Big Bang
theory and makes
the Atom Totality an instant winner. There should be no such solid
body rotation of many
galaxies in a Big Bang universe. The moment astronomers sighted and
reported solid body rotation of
many galaxies, should have been the moment in history of astronomy
that the Big Bang theory
was shelved as false theory awaiting for a true theory of cosmology.
What year was that, by the
way when solid body rotation was reported to include many galaxies?
Was it the 1980s?

Now the globular cluster solid body rotation is a different story and
I am rather mildly puzzled
by it. When we witness solid body rotation, we are not seeing the
force of gravity at work. Gravity
is out of the picture when there is solid body rotation. We have an
Electromagnetism as the force
that causes solid body rotation. So I am puzzled as to why solid body
rotation would appear inside
galaxies of their star composition, and can only explain some EM force
going on there. Is it the stars
plasma of the magneto-hydrodynamics (the Swede that was big on magneto
hydrodynamics) in play? Or could it be that at galactic centers, the
positron space
that makes the galactic centers is so powerful that it treats the
surrounding stars as if it were a
gigantic electric motor? And of course the Atom Totality itself is a
gigantic electric motor and why
we would see solid body rotation of many galaxies.

So I really need to expand upon Solid Body Rotation. And perhaps it is
the proving and deciding evidence
that wins the Atom Totality.


Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

  #3  
Old May 17th 11, 07:58 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math
Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 858
Default comparing Tifft with solid body rotation Chapter 11 Solid BodyRotation for galaxies only in Atom Totality, not Big Bang #432 Atom Totality4th ed

On May 17, 1:29*pm, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote:
On May 17, 3:17*am, Archimedes Plutonium

wrote:
I need to expand on this solid body rotation that is often seen in
astronomy, whether galactic rotation of several galaxies or whether
globular-clusters of stars within a galaxy.


Alright, I really need to expand Solid Body Rotation in a big manner
in this book.
I think it is fair to say that Solid Body Rotation is an easy
parameter to measure
of astro bodies and that it is not burdened with alot of hidden
dubious assumptions.
That bodies are in view and have Solid Body Rotation are
straightforward observations
that can not be denied or doubted as most other astro observations.


Alright, let me talk about astronomers and their assumptions and
hidden assumptions
which makes alot of the science of astronomy mostly just "opinion". We
see it in the
redshift where its founder of Hubble accepted it and endorsed it and
then near the end of
his life, flatly denied it and reversed course. Hubble had realized
that redshift measurement
could be many different things and not an accurate measure of the
distance.

Recently in astro history alongside the Solid Body Rotation was the
Tifft quantized galaxy speeds
which also trashcans the Big Bang and leaves the Atom Totality a
winner. So immediately the Big
Bang worshippers had a problem on their hands. They had to discredit
Tifft in a hurry and get rid
of his quantized galaxy speeds in a hurry. So this was an easy job for
those Big Bang lovers because
the quantized galaxy speeds or quantized redshift has a fair amount of
assumptions going in. So the
discrediting of Tifft, even though his data is true and that galaxies
are quantized in speed, even though
it is true, the many rum-dummies of the astro community could easily
discredit Tifft.

However, when those same Big Bang lovers, those rum dummies, those
little minds in science try to discredit
Solid Body Rotation, well, solid body rotation defeats them before
they can even make a whimper of a noise
against solid body rotation.

Solid Body Rotation is one of those few measurements in astronomy that
have no tampering with the evidence.
Unlike Tiffts quantized galaxy speeds, the little rum dummies can rush
in like fools and mess up and destroy
that evidence, but they cannot do that with Solid Body Rotation.

And that is plain to see they could not destroy and sweep away solid
body rotation and it became the missing mass problem for those Big
Bangers that love their Big Bang, when it should have been a
trashcanning of the Big Bang since no gravity can explain solid body
rotation, only electricity and magnetism.

That the space of a Galactic center is Dirac's positron space that
creates a solid body rotation, and the solid
body rotation of many galaxies is due to the Atom Totality as a whole.

Funny, how the most honest science reporting is not to be found in
Nature magazine or Science magazine
but right here in sci.physics newsgroup, where the freedom of speech
is not muffled by zealous opinionated
Big Bang lovers that want to suppress and repress the science news.
All one has to do is read the history
of Tifft and how his quantized galaxy speeds has been systematically
suppressed and repressed by those
rum dummy astronomers.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
tiplication breaks down from Euclidean into NonEuclidean geometrysolid body rotation inside an atom of its electron dot cloud; Chapter 4,Missing Mass #224 Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 1 July 20th 10 06:16 AM
Redshift and Microwave radiation favor Atom Totality and disfavorBig Bang #9; ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) theory; replaces Big Bang theory Net-Teams, Astronomy Misc 1 May 31st 10 05:19 PM
chapt 14 missing mass, solid body rotation inside an atom of itselectrons? #205 Atom Totality Theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 1 December 16th 09 05:26 AM
distribution of galaxies points to Atom Totality not Big Bang #176 ;3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 November 6th 09 08:29 AM
can solid-body rotation alone prove the Universe is an atom? #131;3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 1 August 9th 09 05:57 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2020 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.