|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Hagar still willingly bending over to let NASA do it to him
palsing wrote: Most of your questions are answered here... http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/f...lo.html#crater ... the Grandaddy of all debunking sites... Really, you need to be several fries short of a Happy Meal to buy into these conspiracy theories... GOOD COMEBACK. Nothing like resorting to personal insults during a debate. And extra points for deleting my whole reply. So, now that you have set the bar to the lowest peg, I guess my next counter reply should be .,......."Oh YAA,...well so's yer mom" You can consider yourself "ignored" from now on |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Hagar still willingly bending over to let NASA do it to him
"Bast" wrote in message news
palsing wrote: Most of your questions are answered here... http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/f...lo.html#crater ... the Grandaddy of all debunking sites... Really, you need to be several fries short of a Happy Meal to buy into these conspiracy theories... GOOD COMEBACK. Nothing like resorting to personal insults during a debate. And extra points for deleting my whole reply. So, now that you have set the bar to the lowest peg, I guess my next counter reply should be .,......."Oh YAA,...well so's yer mom" You can consider yourself "ignored" from now on *** I think we should all ignore your ignorant skanky ass from now on. You are just like a woman ... half a brain and too dumb to parallel park. |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Hagar still willingly bending over to let NASA do it to him
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 09:57:47 -0500, "Bast"
wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 22:03:30 -0800 (PST), palsing wrote: On Wednesday, December 13, 2017 at 8:54:46 PM UTC-8, Bast wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 21:07:26 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 09:27:14 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 20:02:46 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 06:47:47 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: So you Are still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. So your story still goes. Still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. But no actual proof. I provided proof, Bastie. It is not my fault you are too stupid to find it in the thread and read it. Still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. You only provided a vague referrence to something that only you, would consider "proof" Keep lying, Bastie. These are still in the thread. Message-ID: Message-ID: You convinnced no one, that Apollo and NASA was/is not a massive money sucking lie. I don't need to convince anyone of the truth. There are thousands of verifiable and scientific proof on the web. You're simply to stupid to find them and too dumb to understand what they say. Not my problem. Now my proof again. Still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. Ya right,.... Still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. and it's just as plausible that I went to the planet Mars for my Christmas vacation last year. I doubt anyone reading this on alt.astronomy would question that you're not a space cadet. Urban Dictionary: space cadet https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=space some one who acts like they are on another planet or plane of existence. either they are incredibly stupid or are on drugs or most likely a combination a person perceived as out of touch with reality. My reality exists. There are links on the web to it. You can only resort to insults, deleting my posts, and making your own unverifiable vague references. No wonder why the world perceives that you are hagar with a sock-puppet account. Now,..... my proof again. "A funny thing happened on the way to the moon" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xciCJfbTvE4 NASA LIED ABOUT APOLLO, and likely a lot more. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMrB857Oaxw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYA_g2AJ0fc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKkpfYUhkig https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5XkLa9RYNk&t=4s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=401AXoN0mQE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79p2kzeN0tQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wym04J_3Ls0 LOL Poor Bast doesn't have one hint of critical thinking skills. She's a fair troll. But not much of a challenge to engage and destroy. Here is a freebie debunking for you. Just to show how charitable and generous I am during the Chrstmas season. Still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. Radio intercepts, Bastie. Moon hoax conspiracy debunked: Engine halos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSikP0i3fr0 Radio intercepts. Now lets go over it, shall we. The landing video clearly shows dust/debris being shot out radially during the landing video taken by the astro-nots themselves. It is even mentioned in the audio that they are "throwing some dust" Radio intercepts. But after the landing, not one photo shows any disturbance of the surface under the lander, or any sign of the radial lines the dust would have formed. Even the tinyest of craters are still pristine and round. Radio intercepts. Still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. Now,....please explain to me Still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. You stupid troll. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Hagar still willingly bending over to let NASA do it to him
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 07:56:28 -0800 (PST), palsing
wrote: Most of your questions are answered here... http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/f...lo.html#crater ... the Grandaddy of all debunking sites... Really, you need to be several fries short of a Happy Meal to buy into these conspiracy theories... She is a dingbat trying to troll the newsgroup. Used to have a partner but it looks like he even got tired of her idiocy. Imagine low shameful she is lying about her sister dying on 9/11. |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Hagar still willingly bending over to let NASA do it to him
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 11:55:25 -0500, "Bast"
wrote: palsing wrote: Most of your questions are answered here... http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/f...lo.html#crater ... the Grandaddy of all debunking sites... Really, you need to be several fries short of a Happy Meal to buy into these conspiracy theories... GOOD COMEBACK. Nothing like resorting to personal insults during a debate. And extra points for deleting my whole reply. So, now that you have set the bar to the lowest peg, I guess my next counter reply should be .,......."Oh YAA,...well so's yer mom" You can consider yourself "ignored" from now on AHAHAHAHAHA!! She's falling apart. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
Hagar still willingly bending over to let NASA do it to him
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 12:18:02 -0800, Hägar wrote:
"Bast" wrote in message news palsing wrote: Most of your questions are answered here... http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/f...lo.html#crater ... the Grandaddy of all debunking sites... Really, you need to be several fries short of a Happy Meal to buy into these conspiracy theories... GOOD COMEBACK. Nothing like resorting to personal insults during a debate. And extra points for deleting my whole reply. So, now that you have set the bar to the lowest peg, I guess my next counter reply should be .,......."Oh YAA,...well so's yer mom" You can consider yourself "ignored" from now on *** I think we should all ignore your ignorant skanky ass from now on. Consider it done. You are just like a woman ... half a brain and too dumb to parallel park. Hey! LOL |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
Hagar still willingly bending over to let NASA do it to him
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 09:09:43 -0500, "Bast"
wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 23:54:43 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 21:07:26 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 09:27:14 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 20:02:46 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 06:47:47 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: So you Are still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. So your story still goes. Still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. But no actual proof. I provided proof, Bastie. It is not my fault you are too stupid to find it in the thread and read it. Still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. You only provided a vague referrence to something that only you, would consider "proof" Keep lying, Bastie. These are still in the thread. Message-ID: Message-ID: You convinnced no one, that Apollo and NASA was/is not a massive money sucking lie. I don't need to convince anyone of the truth. There are thousands of verifiable and scientific proof on the web. You're simply to stupid to find them and too dumb to understand what they say. Not my problem. Now my proof again. Still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. Ya right,.... Still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. and it's just as plausible that I went to the planet Mars for my Christmas vacation last year. I doubt anyone reading this on alt.astronomy would question that you're not a space cadet. Urban Dictionary: space cadet https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=space some one who acts like they are on another planet or plane of existence. either they are incredibly stupid or are on drugs or most likely a combination a person perceived as out of touch with reality. My reality exists. You finally admit you have a *different* reality from everyone else. Now, still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. A lot of talk and false bravado,....but still no links to back you up. Present the actual evidence,.....I'm willing to destroy it as fast as you can shovel it. You poor sensitive little troll. Still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
Hagar still willingly bending over to let NASA do it to him
Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 11:55:25 -0500, "Bast" wrote: palsing wrote: Most of your questions are answered here... http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/f...lo.html#crater ... the Grandaddy of all debunking sites... Really, you need to be several fries short of a Happy Meal to buy into these conspiracy theories... GOOD COMEBACK. Nothing like resorting to personal insults during a debate. And extra points for deleting my whole reply. So, now that you have set the bar to the lowest peg, I guess my next counter reply should be .,......."Oh YAA,...well so's yer mom" You can consider yourself "ignored" from now on AHAHAHAHAHA!! She's falling apart. Nope, but this thread is. So time for me to abandon this one, and start a fresh one about NASA LIES. ....As they were supposed to release a brand new whopper today. |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Hagar still willingly bending over to let NASA do it to him
"Sarah Ehrett" wrote in message
... On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 07:56:28 -0800 (PST), palsing wrote: Most of your questions are answered here... http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/f...lo.html#crater ... the Grandaddy of all debunking sites... Really, you need to be several fries short of a Happy Meal to buy into these conspiracy theories... She is a dingbat trying to troll the newsgroup. Used to have a partner but it looks like he even got tired of her idiocy. Imagine low shameful she is lying about her sister dying on 9/11. *** they thrive on making up **** ... |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
Hagar still willingly bending over to let NASA do it to him
Hägar wrote: "Sarah Ehrett" wrote in message ... On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 07:56:28 -0800 (PST), palsing wrote: Most of your questions are answered here... http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/f...lo.html#crater ... the Grandaddy of all debunking sites... Really, you need to be several fries short of a Happy Meal to buy into these conspiracy theories... She is a dingbat trying to troll the newsgroup. Used to have a partner but it looks like he even got tired of her idiocy. Imagine low shameful she is lying about her sister dying on 9/11. *** they thrive on making up **** ... If that was true, I would have a job at NASA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FR Bending of Light -- Proof | oriel36[_2_] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | January 25th 10 08:14 PM |
FR Bending of Light | philippeb8 | Astronomy Misc | 221 | December 8th 09 06:31 PM |
A question about the bending of light. | brian a m stuckless | Policy | 0 | May 1st 06 11:46 PM |
A question about the bending of light. | brian a m stuckless | Policy | 0 | May 1st 06 04:53 PM |
A question about the bending of light. | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 1st 06 04:53 PM |