A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

At close to c stuff shrinks in the direction its going



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 14th 18, 06:45 PM posted to alt.astronomy
herbert glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,045
Default At close to c stuff shrinks in the direction its going

If the king of England was going at 99% of c he would look like the king of hearts.Bert
  #2  
Old July 14th 18, 07:32 PM posted to alt.astronomy
hanson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,934
Default At close to c stuff shrinks in the direction its going

"reber G=emc^2" will
write "until the last sound of the Gong is gone
as SwineBert will post stupid **** all day long". Bert.
"it's a given". "On the money. "Go figure" "O ya" Bert

  #3  
Old July 14th 18, 09:24 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Double-A[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,515
Default At close to c stuff shrinks in the direction its going

On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 10:45:11 AM UTC-7, Herbert Glazier wrote:
If the king of England was going at 99% of c he would look like the king of hearts.Bert



The key thing here is "he would look like" from our frame of reference. He would not actually be flat.

Double-A

  #4  
Old July 17th 18, 01:51 PM posted to alt.astronomy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 537
Default At close to c stuff shrinks in the direction its going

NO speed will ever get anywhere near light speed. Current greatest
space probe speed is slower than light by a factor of about 30,000 .
Any mass traveling at light speed would have infinite energy which is
clearly impossible.
  #5  
Old July 17th 18, 09:46 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Double-A[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,515
Default At close to c stuff shrinks in the direction its going

On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 5:51:12 AM UTC-7, wrote:
NO speed will ever get anywhere near light speed. Current greatest
space probe speed is slower than light by a factor of about 30,000 .
Any mass traveling at light speed would have infinite energy which is
clearly impossible.



Cosmic ray particles can travel as fast as 99.6% of the speed of light.

Double-A

  #6  
Old July 18th 18, 12:31 AM posted to alt.astronomy
herbert glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,045
Default At close to c stuff shrinks in the direction its going

On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:24:20 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 10:45:11 AM UTC-7, Herbert Glazier wrote:
If the king of England was going at 99% of c he would look like the king of hearts.Bert



The key thing here is "he would look like" from our frame of reference. He would not actually be flat.

Double-A


How do we get a reference frame from an identity going at c.?Bert
  #7  
Old July 18th 18, 12:56 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Double-A[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,515
Default At close to c stuff shrinks in the direction its going

On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 4:31:31 PM UTC-7, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:24:20 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 10:45:11 AM UTC-7, Herbert Glazier wrote:
If the king of England was going at 99% of c he would look like the king of hearts.Bert



The key thing here is "he would look like" from our frame of reference. He would not actually be flat.

Double-A


How do we get a reference frame from an identity going at c.?Bert



A photon has no rest frame.

Double-A

  #8  
Old July 18th 18, 02:14 AM posted to alt.astronomy
IAM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 181
Default At close to c stuff shrinks in the direction its going

On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:24:20 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 10:45:11 AM UTC-7, Herbert Glazier wrote:
If the king of England was going at 99% of c he would look like the king of hearts.Bert



The key thing here is "he would look like" from our frame of reference. He would not actually be flat.

Double-A


+ 1

  #9  
Old July 18th 18, 05:04 AM posted to alt.astronomy
hanson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,934
Default At close to c stuff shrinks in the direction its going

http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier-s-REAL-intent
  #10  
Old July 18th 18, 12:44 PM posted to alt.astronomy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 537
Default At close to c stuff shrinks in the direction its going

Cosmic rays are NOT matter or mass.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Acceleration shrinks objects G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] Misc 0 May 20th 09 10:48 PM
Election is one month away, New Direction New Direction Europe, NewDirection World. Now is the time to say 'Americans at large still don't seegenocide taking place in Iraq in 2008', Americans at large in 2008 haven'theard of CCTV in the UK, not even [email protected] Astronomy Misc 0 October 2nd 08 11:15 PM
...So Just How Close to Reality did Space Solar Power Come?....ans: Very close! Jonathan Space Station 0 May 11th 07 04:20 AM
...So Just How Close to Reality did Space Solar Power Come?....Ans: Very close! Jonathan History 0 May 11th 07 01:48 AM
Why Astronauts Don't Like Shrinks By HILARY HYLTON/AUSTIN Jeff Findley Policy 5 February 14th 07 04:14 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.