For more than half a century, theoretical physicists have been reconciling spacetime, the absurd consequence of Einstein's false constant-speed-of-light postulate, and the absolute (Newtonian) time of quantum mechanics:
"The effort to unify quantum mechanics and general relativity means reconciling totally different notions of time. In quantum mechanics, time is universal and absolute; its steady ticks dictate the evolving entanglements between particles. But in general relativity (Albert Einstein's theory of gravity), time is relative and dynamical, a dimension that's inextricably interwoven with directions X, Y and Z into a four-dimensional "space-time" fabric.."
https://www.quantamagazine.org/20161...-time-problem/
Perimeter Institute: "Quantum mechanics has one thing, time, which is absolute. But general relativity tells us that space and time are both dynamical so there is a big contradiction there. So the question is, can quantum gravity be formulated in a context where quantum mechanics still has absolute time?"
https://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/re...essons-quantum
http://negrjp.fotoblog.uol.com.br/im...0819051851.jpg
In Big Brother's world scientists are desperately trying to reconcile 2+2=5, gloriously discovered by Big Brother, and 2+2=4:
http://img.picturequotes.com/2/424/4...as-quote-1.jpg
Pentcho Valev