INTROSPECTION IN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD

Some time ago a distinguished hypnotist in Einstein criminal cult made
an important discovery:

http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/arch.../02/Norton.pdf
John Norton: "Einstein regarded the Michelson-Morley experiment as
evidence for the principle of relativity, whereas later writers almost
universally use it as support for the light postulate of special
relativity......THE MICHELSON-MORLEY EXPERIMENT IS FULLY COMPATIBLE
WITH AN EMISSION THEORY OF LIGHT THAT CONTRADICTS THE LIGHT
POSTULATE."

On seeing the discovery, later writers always ask a crucial question:

"Why do we universally teach that the Michelson-Morley experiment
confirms Einstein's light postulate while in fact the Michelson-Morley
experiment contradicts Einstein's light postulate?"

Then later writers look into their own minds and try to find there
either stupidity or dishonesty: otherwise the universal distortion of
the truth cannot be explained. Fortunately, the introspection always
gives opposite results: as later writers look into their own minds,
they see intelligence, honesty and nothing else. Excitement grows,
later writers sing "Divine Einstein" and go into convulsions.

Then some of the later writers ask another crucial question:

"Since the Michelson-Morley experiment confirms the emission theory of
light, why don't we add this emission theory to Divine Albert's Divine
Theory?"

Later writers add the emission theory to Divine Albert's Divine
Theory, sing "Divine Einstein" and go into convulsions again:

http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/i6272.html
John Stachel: "Not only is the theory [of relativity] compatible with
an emission theory of radiation, since it implies that the velocity of
light is always the same relative to its source; the theory also
requires that radiation transfer mass between an emitter and an
absorber, reinforcing Einstein's light quantum hypothesis that
radiation manifests a particulate structure under certain
circumstances."

http://ustl1.univ-lille1.fr/culture/...40/pgs/4_5.pdf
Jean Eisenstaedt: "Il n'y a alors aucune raison theorique a ce que la
vitesse de la lumiere ne depende pas de la vitesse de sa source ainsi
que de celle de l'observateur terrestre ; plus clairement encore, il
n'y a pas de raison, dans le cadre de la logique des Principia de
Newton, pour que la lumiere se comporte autrement - quant a sa
trajectoire - qu'une particule materielle. Il n'y a pas non plus de
raison pour que la lumiere ne soit pas sensible a la gravitation.
Bref, pourquoi ne pas appliquer a la lumiere toute la theorie
newtonienne ? C'est en fait ce que font plusieurs astronomes,
opticiens, philosophes de la nature a la fin du XVIIIeme siecle. Les
resultats sont etonnants... et aujourd'hui nouveaux."

Translation from French: "Therefore there is no theoretical reason why
the speed of light should not depend on the speed of the source and
the speed of the terrestrial observer as well; even more clearly,
there is no reason, in the framework of the logic of Newton's
Principia, why light should behave, as far as its trajectory is
concerned, differently from a material particle. Neither is there any
reason why light should not be sensible to gravitation. Briefly, why
don't we apply the whole Newtonian theory to light? In fact, that is
what many astronomers, opticians, philosophers of nature did by the
end of 18th century. The results are surprising....and new nowadays."

Pentcho Valev

Hypnotists in Einstein criminal cult have already adopted Newton's
emission theory: they can imagine fast photons, slow photons etc. Now
they are going to abandon Einstein's relativity but do not seem to be
very sad or frightened and even demonstrate their relativistic humour:

http://www.universetoday.com/2007/10...peed-of-light/
"The speed of light is the speed of light, and that's that. Right?
Well, maybe not. Try and figure this out. Astronomers studying
radiation coming from a distant galaxy found that the high energy
gamma rays arrived a few minutes after the lower-energy photons, even
though they were emitted at the same time. If true, this result would
overturn Einstein's theory of relativity, which says that all photons
should move at the speed of light. Uh oh Einstein."

Pentcho Valev

"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message
ps.com...
Hypnotists in Einstein criminal cult have already adopted Newton's
emission theory: they can imagine fast photons, slow photons etc. Now
they are going to abandon Einstein's relativity but do not seem to be
very sad or frightened and even demonstrate their relativistic humour:

http://www.universetoday.com/2007/10...peed-of-light/
"The speed of light is the speed of light, and that's that. Right?
Well, maybe not. Try and figure this out. Astronomers studying
radiation coming from a distant galaxy found that the high energy
gamma rays arrived a few minutes after the lower-energy photons, even
though they were emitted at the same time. If true, this result would
overturn Einstein's theory of relativity, which says that all photons
should move at the speed of light. Uh oh Einstein."

Pentcho Valev


It's well-known that higher energy photons have greater likelihood of
interacting with matter. Maybe that explains it -- all the absorbtions and
re-emissions between here and there. Maybe the high energy rays are
actually emitted later but this is yet to be plumbed with precision. No,
this news does nothing to "overturn Einstein's theory". Why would you
want to overturn what is patently gorgeous and natural and so true-to-form
vis-a-vis That Zany Gifter, The Almighty?

On 23 Oct, 01:38, "Ben Bean" wrote:
"Pentcho Valev" wrote:

Hypnotists in Einstein criminal cult have already adopted Newton's
emission theory: they can imagine fast photons, slow photons etc. Now
they are going to abandon Einstein's relativity but do not seem to be
very sad or frightened and even demonstrate their relativistic humour:

http://www.universetoday.com/2007/10...ma-rays-go-slo...
"The speed of light is the speed of light, and that's that. Right?
Well, maybe not. Try and figure this out. Astronomers studying
radiation coming from a distant galaxy found that the high energy
gamma rays arrived a few minutes after the lower-energy photons, even
though they were emitted at the same time. If true, this result would
overturn Einstein's theory of relativity, which says that all photons
should move at the speed of light. Uh oh Einstein."

Pentcho Valev

It's well-known that higher energy photons have greater likelihood of
interacting with matter. Maybe that explains it -- all the absorbtions and
re-emissions between here and there. Maybe the high energy rays are
actually emitted later but this is yet to be plumbed with precision. No,
this news does nothing to "overturn Einstein's theory".

Nothing can overturn Einstein's "theory" in Einstein zombie world.
Much simpler experiments such as Michelson-Morley, Sagnac and Pound-
Rebka, which in another world would OBVIOUSLY contradict Einstein's
idiocies, have been converted by your criminal Masters into glorious
confirmations of those idiocies:

http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/arch.../02/Norton.pdf
John Norton: "Einstein regarded the Michelson-Morley experiment as
evidence for the principle of relativity, whereas LATER WRITERS ALMOST
UNIVERSALLY use it as support for the light postulate of special
relativity......THE MICHELSON-MORLEY EXPERIMENT IS FULLY COMPATIBLE
WITH AN EMISSION THEORY OF LIGHT THAT CONTRADICTS THE LIGHT
POSTULATE."

So the point is not the experimental refutation of Einstein's
idiocies. Rather, you should have noticed the implicit, and in the
cases of John Stachel and Jean Eisenstaedt explicit, return to
NEWTON'S EMISSION THEORY OF LIGHT. Your criminal Masters cannot (or
find it difficult to) extract money from Einstein's idiocies and are
trying to convert the emission theory into a new money-spinner.

Pentcho Valev