A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Einstein's Science: What Went Wrong?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old November 15th 16, 10:09 AM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Einstein's Science: What Went Wrong?

http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2016/11/16696/
Edward R. Dougherty: "When Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin stepped onto the lunar surface in 1969, it marked the end of perhaps the most productive period of scientific research and application, beginning with the publication of Albert Einstein's special theory of relativity in 1905. Universities were teeming with mathematically gifted students studying science, mathematics, and engineering, and preparing for exciting futures in the unlimited vistas of science. What went wrong?"

"The most productive period" was actually a period of accumulation of absurdities, metastases of the original tumor - Einstein's 1905 false constant-speed-of-light postulate. This postulate, combined with the principle of relativity, entails SYMMETRICAL time dilation - either clock is slow as judged from the other clock's system. Sounds idiotic, so instead of honestly deriving this in 1905, Einstein derived, fraudulently and invalidly of course, something that sounded breathtaking - ASYMMETRICAL time dilation. In Einstein's 1905 paper the moving clock is slow and lags behind the stationary one which is, accordingly, FAST (this means that the moving clock and its owner TRAVEL INTO THE FUTURE - if their speed is great enough, they can jump, within a minute of their experienced time, millions of years ahead):

http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
ON THE ECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES, A. Einstein, 1905: "From this there ensues the following peculiar consequence. If at the points A and B of K there are stationary clocks which, viewed in the stationary system, are synchronous; and if the clock at A is moved with the velocity v along the line AB to B, then on its arrival at B the two clocks no longer synchronize, but the clock moved from A to B lags behind the other which has remained at B by tv^2/2c^2 (up to magnitudes of fourth and higher order), t being the time occupied in the journey from A to B."

The magical "travel into the future" cannot be made up without Einstein's 1905 false constant-speed-of-light postulate, and yet it does not follow VALIDLY from the two postulates of 1905. Logically, "travel into the future" is an independent additional tumor producing its own metastases.

Einstein's 1905 revolution:

http://negrjp.fotoblog.uol.com.br/im...0819051851.jpg

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Einstein must have known he was wrong. HVAC[_2_] Misc 0 October 8th 11 07:06 PM
Einstein must have known he was wrong. Painius[_1_] Misc 0 October 7th 11 10:45 PM
Einstein must have known he was wrong. Painius[_1_] Misc 11 October 5th 11 06:31 PM
Einstein must have known he was wrong. G=EMC^2[_2_] Misc 2 September 28th 11 09:25 PM
Was Einstein Wrong? Double-A[_3_] Misc 9 March 16th 09 10:52 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.