A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Science
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

replies in this group



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 28th 06, 09:59 AM posted to sci.space.science
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default replies in this group

I am a little disappointed that many do not take the trouble to explain why
they give a particular answer. I certainly do not think it does the image of
science or scientists any favours not to at least point to a resource or
give a simple explanation of why they think as they do.

For myself, I read the info I can understand, ie, that which is not steeped
in such complex jargon or maths as to be a turn off, then formulate my own
ideas.

I seriously think that we all need to bring science down to earth more, as
it were (pun intended), as the basic concepts should be explainable without
huge amounts of complexity.

Brian

--
Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email:
__________________________________________________ __________________________
__________________________________


  #2  
Old January 29th 06, 12:29 AM posted to sci.space.science
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default replies in this group

"Brian Gaff" wrote in message
k...
I am a little disappointed that many do not take the trouble to explain

why
they give a particular answer. I certainly do not think it does the image

of
science or scientists any favours not to at least point to a resource or
give a simple explanation of why they think as they do.

For myself, I read the info I can understand, ie, that which is not

steeped
in such complex jargon or maths as to be a turn off, then formulate my own
ideas.

I seriously think that we all need to bring science down to earth more,

as
it were (pun intended), as the basic concepts should be explainable

without
huge amounts of complexity.

Brian

I appreciate your dilemma: however, if someone is responding with 'complex
jargon' or maths then that is probably because it is required to answer the
question. If you can't understand the answer because of the complexity then
maybe just ask another question to get some clarification. If someone has
gone to the trouble of giving a complex answer they will most likely be
happy to explain a bit more. It's often difficult to tell what level the
question is coming from.

As for links for further reference, that's always a good suggestion. I note
that that already does happen quite often.

Cheers.

Ken

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Yahoo! Group visual_sky has been created Xevios Amateur Astronomy 8 May 27th 04 07:02 AM
Yahoo! Group visual_sky has been created Xevios UK Astronomy 0 May 26th 04 11:52 PM
I'm gone. Rod Mollise Amateur Astronomy 64 February 24th 04 01:51 PM
Stafford-Covey Task Group Holds First Public Meeting Ron Baalke Space Shuttle 0 August 1st 03 11:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.