|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
High strength fibers for hydrogen storage on the VentureStar.
Nice articles here on the problems that led to the cancellation of the
VentureStar/X-33, a single-stage to orbit vehicle: Lockheed Martin X-33. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_X-33 X-33/VentureStar - What really happened. http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?id=4180 Interestingly the main problem was making the liquid hydrogen tanks light enough, certainly not a high tech problem. I wonder if lightweight storage could be achieved by storing the hydrogen in very many micron-scale hollow fibers. See the table of tensile strengths listed he Tensile strength. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensile_strength The solutions investigated for the hydrogen tanks for VentureStar included using high strength aluminum alloys or composite fiber tanks. The composite tanks were lighter but had a problem of debonding under high pressure. Note in the table of tensile strengths carbon fiber has a better strength to weight ratio than the aluminum alloy listed by a factor of 19 to 1. And the high strength glass fibers known as S-glass is better than the aluminum alloy by 10 to 1. There is also a special steel fiber known as scifer steel not listed in the table that has a tensile strength of 5500 MPa at a density of 7.8 g/cc. That is better than aluminum alloy by a factor of 4 to 1. It might even be for the carbon fibers and the S-glass fibers their strength to weight ratios are so high you wouldn't need to store the hydrogen in liquid form. You could store it as high density gas. That would eliminate the weight of the cryogenic systems for the hydrogen. However, a key question here is whether this strength will be maintained in the radial direction. All the strengths listed for the fibers are for pulling along their lengths, i.e, their longitudinal tensile strength. But to use the fibers as thin hollow pressure tubes will require their strength to hold in the radial direction. After investigating this question before for hydrogen storage, I know that S- glass and scifer steel fibers do retain that strength in the radial directions. I'm not sure if this is true for the carbon fiber. (BTW, the high strength polymer fibers listed in the table such as Kevlar, Dyneema, or Spectra are unsuitable because their strength only holds in the longitudinal direction, not radially.) Another key problem for using high strength fibers as hollow tubes is that they are only about 10 microns wide. So millions to billions of them would be needed to form sizable storage tanks. You would need a method of opening and closing these microscopically thin tubes at the same time for a throttleable engine. Perhaps one solution would be to have only a small portion of them being used at any one time and letting those completely empty out, then open another portion, and so on until all the fuel is used up. This would be an easier solution than having so many precisely controlled valves at the micro-scale that operated all in unison. Bob Clark |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
High strength fibers for hydrogen storage on the VentureStar.
On Jul 29, 9:59 am, Robert Clark wrote:
Nice articles here on the problems that led to the cancellation of the VentureStar/X-33, a single-stage to orbit vehicle: Lockheed Martin X-33.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_X-33 X-33/VentureStar - What really happened.http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?id=4180 Interestingly the main problem was making the liquid hydrogen tanks light enough, certainly not a high tech problem. I wonder if lightweight storage could be achieved by storing the hydrogen in very many micron-scale hollow fibers. See the table of tensile strengths listed he Tensile strength.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensile_strength The solutions investigated for the hydrogen tanks for VentureStar included using high strength aluminum alloys or composite fiber tanks. The composite tanks were lighter but had a problem of debonding under high pressure. Note in the table of tensile strengths carbon fiber has a better strength to weight ratio than the aluminum alloy listed by a factor of 19 to 1. And the high strength glass fibers known as S-glass is better than the aluminum alloy by 10 to 1. There is also a special steel fiber known as scifer steel not listed in the table that has a tensile strength of 5500 MPa at a density of 7.8 g/cc. That is better than aluminum alloy by a factor of 4 to 1. It might even be for the carbon fibers and the S-glass fibers their strength to weight ratios are so high you wouldn't need to store the hydrogen in liquid form. You could store it as high density gas. That would eliminate the weight of the cryogenic systems for the hydrogen. However, a key question here is whether this strength will be maintained in the radial direction. All the strengths listed for the fibers are for pulling along their lengths, i.e, their longitudinal tensile strength. But to use the fibers as thin hollow pressure tubes will require their strength to hold in the radial direction. After investigating this question before for hydrogen storage, I know that S- glass and scifer steel fibers do retain that strength in the radial directions. I'm not sure if this is true for the carbon fiber. (BTW, the high strength polymer fibers listed in the table such as Kevlar, Dyneema, or Spectra are unsuitable because their strength only holds in the longitudinal direction, not radially.) Another key problem for using high strength fibers as hollow tubes is that they are only about 10 microns wide. So millions to billions of them would be needed to form sizable storage tanks. You would need a method of opening and closing these microscopically thin tubes at the same time for a throttleable engine. Perhaps one solution would be to have only a small portion of them being used at any one time and letting those completely empty out, then open another portion, and so on until all the fuel is used up. This would be an easier solution than having so many precisely controlled valves at the micro-scale that operated all in unison. Bob Clark How about instead of LH2, using h2o2 at 98% purity. 100% h2o2 is essentially a crystal like solid. How about using a basalt fiber and micro-balloon composite as the primary structural shell or containment vessel on behalf of whatever fluid storage tank? (it can even be plasma metallic coated on the inside) h2o2 along with a little synfuel is actually offering a better volumetric density worth of stored energy in a fluid format that's not the least bit cryogenic or even all that vapor prone. - Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
High strength fibers for hydrogen storage on the VentureStar.
Did they look at using aerogel to fill in the honeycombs instead of
the heavier foam insulation? I like to think that the air force and DOD/CIA took all the parts and made something anyway, something that's flying right now, probably unmanned. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
High strength fibers for hydrogen storage on the VentureStar.
On Aug 1, 12:46 pm, "D. Orbitt" wrote:
Did they look at using aerogel to fill in the honeycombs instead of the heavier foam insulation? I like to think that the air force and DOD/CIA took all the parts and made something anyway, something that's flying right now, probably unmanned. DARPA does whatever they want and whenever they want, without asking or telling. (it's a Zionist/Nazi kind of New World Order thing, that we're not supposed to understand) * Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
High strength fibers for hydrogen storage on the VentureStar.
"D. Orbitt" wrote in message ... Did they look at using aerogel to fill in the honeycombs instead of the heavier foam insulation? I like to think that the air force and DOD/CIA took all the parts and made something anyway, something that's flying right now, probably unmanned. That would be a neat trick, considering the tanks failed during testing. And we're not talking a little failure here. We're talking about big time structural failure. Jeff -- A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it. -- Einstein |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
High strength fibers for hydrogen storage on the VentureStar.
On Aug 1, 3:46 pm, "D. Orbitt" wrote:
I like to think that the air force and DOD/CIA took all the parts and made something anyway, something that's flying right now, probably unmanned. Not really possible. Can't hide operations of a vehicle that size |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
High strength fibers for hydrogen storage on the VentureStar.
On Jul 29, 12:59 pm, Robert Clark wrote:
Nice articles here on the problems that led to the cancellation of the VentureStar/X-33, a single-stage to orbit vehicle: Lockheed Martin X-33.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_X-33 X-33/VentureStar - What really happened.http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?id=4180 Interestingly the main problem was making the liquid hydrogen tanks light enough, certainly not a high tech problem. I wonder if lightweight storage could be achieved by storing the hydrogen in very many micron-scale hollow fibers. See the table of tensile strengths listed he Tensile strength.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensile_strength The solutions investigated for the hydrogen tanks for VentureStar included using high strength aluminum alloys or composite fiber tanks. The composite tanks were lighter but had a problem of debonding under high pressure. Note in the table of tensile strengths carbon fiber has a better strength to weight ratio than the aluminum alloy listed by a factor of 19 to 1. And the high strength glass fibers known as S-glass is better than the aluminum alloy by 10 to 1. There is also a special steel fiber known as scifer steel not listed in the table that has a tensile strength of 5500 MPa at a density of 7.8 g/cc. That is better than aluminum alloy by a factor of 4 to 1. It might even be for the carbon fibers and the S-glass fibers their strength to weight ratios are so high you wouldn't need to store the hydrogen in liquid form. You could store it as high density gas. That would eliminate the weight of the cryogenic systems for the hydrogen. However, a key question here is whether this strength will be maintained in the radial direction. All the strengths listed for the fibers are for pulling along their lengths, i.e, their longitudinal tensile strength. But to use the fibers as thin hollow pressure tubes will require their strength to hold in the radial direction. After investigating this question before for hydrogen storage, I know that S- glass and scifer steel fibers do retain that strength in the radial directions. I'm not sure if this is true for the carbon fiber. (BTW, the high strength polymer fibers listed in the table such as Kevlar, Dyneema, or Spectra are unsuitable because their strength only holds in the longitudinal direction, not radially.) Another key problem for using high strength fibers as hollow tubes is that they are only about 10 microns wide. So millions to billions of them would be needed to form sizable storage tanks. You would need a method of opening and closing these microscopically thin tubes at the same time for a throttleable engine. Perhaps one solution would be to have only a small portion of them being used at any one time and letting those completely empty out, then open another portion, and so on until all the fuel is used up. This would be an easier solution than having so many precisely controlled valves at the micro-scale that operated all in unison. Bob Clark Another possible solution to having so many tubes release the hydrogen in unison might be to have them bound together with one end closed and the other end left open but with a cap over the open end of all of them made of a high strength material to which would be connected the controlling valve. Since the end cap would have a much smaller size than the full tank you could afford to have it be thicker so as to withstand the pressure of the fuel without it taking up too much weight. You would need though to have a strong bond between the material of the end cap and the material composing the separate microtubes. Bob Clark |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
High strength fibers for hydrogen storage on the VentureStar.
Hoop stresses of a tube under pressure increase with the diameter but
volume increases with the square of diameter. High volume/weight pressurised gas storage would, therefore, favor a bigger cylinder. Bret Cahill |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
High strength fibers for hydrogen storage on the VentureStar.
In article
, Bret Cahill wrote: Hoop stresses of a tube under pressure increase with the diameter but volume increases with the square of diameter. High volume/weight pressurised gas storage would, therefore, favor a bigger cylinder. That's a wash. Container weight scales with area times thickness, and thickness scales with hoop stress, so the weight scales as (diameter*length) * diameter, just as volume does. (Neglecting minimum gauge and other non-theoretical effects.) -- David M. Palmer (formerly @clark.net, @ematic.com) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
High strength fibers for hydrogen storage on the VentureStar.
Hoop stresses of a tube under pressure increase with the diameter but
volume increases with the square of diameter. �High volume/weight pressurised gas storage would, therefore, favor a bigger cylinder. . . . Container weight scales with area times thickness, and thickness scales with hoop stress, But the area and volume increase with the diameter _squared_. Bret Cahill |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VentureStar turn-around (was If the Ariane-5 had been reusable...) | Rand Simberg | Policy | 3 | February 13th 07 09:20 PM |
Monatomic hydrogen as fuel - need a low bond energy to single hydrogen atoms. | Robert Clark | Astronomy Misc | 6 | March 29th 06 08:35 AM |
Monatomic hydrogen as fuel - need a low bond energy to single hydrogen atoms. | Robert Clark | Policy | 4 | March 23rd 06 11:16 PM |
Skin Lesions and Fibers | biohacked | Policy | 0 | February 17th 05 06:01 AM |
glass fibers | kystall | Science | 1 | July 23rd 03 03:35 PM |