|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dangerous Mentality
I think NASA has come a long way during the last two and a half years. From
the public's perspective, nothing can be a more obvious demonstrator of that than the upcoming lunch. But the one thing I don't like is how NASA officials keep self-assuring themselves that they have raised the safety standards of a space launch. I think this aire of confidence -- the pat ourselves on the back mentality -- is very dangerous, in that you're lying to yourself by denying the inherent risks invovled in all space missions. In fact, I have a feeling that after the next launch, which has a very high probability of success in the first place (at least 111/113), NASA will be shouting a big proud "We told you so! We told you it's safe!", when in fact, all they have done is demonstrate a very marginal improvement in the success rate (at least 112/114). In othe words, just because I don't get into a wreck on my drive over to the bank, it doesn't necessarily mean that I'm a good driver. Although, it doesn't necessarily mean that I'm a bad driver either -- it's just that there's no way of knowing. They should approach it with a degree of humility, with statements more along the lines of, "We're launching not because we think we've improved the safety to acceptable levels, but because we're not quitters, and we're not going to let past tragedies stop us from making future endavors. There's a good chance that it'll end in a successful mission, but there's also a good chance that it won't. We tried our best." Maybe they've already adopted this mentality, but we won't know for sure until Discovery completes its ground roll at Edwards, and until someone at NASA picks up the microphone at the press conference. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Yuto Shinagawa wrote:
I think NASA has come a long way during the last two and a half years. From the public's perspective, nothing can be a more obvious demonstrator of that than the upcoming lunch. But the one thing I don't like is how NASA officials keep self-assuring themselves that they have raised the safety standards of a space launch. ... I think that the decision to end the shuttle program early, in 2010, tells us all we need to know about what NASA thinks about shuttle's inherent safety, especially given Griffin's commitment to shut it down. Some Congressmen are trying to make him keep shuttle flying longer than he wants! - Ed Kyle |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sedna, space probes?, colonies? what's next? | TKalbfus | Policy | 265 | July 13th 04 12:00 AM |
Are larger manned launch systems more dangerous? | J. Steven York | Space Shuttle | 44 | June 1st 04 09:13 AM |
Too dangerous to go there | jacob navia | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 17th 04 10:20 PM |
Solar flare dangerous to PC? | Stephen | Misc | 56 | November 7th 03 03:05 AM |
No room for Star Trek Mentality that destroys lives (by creating drama) | stargazer | History | 10 | October 2nd 03 05:57 PM |