ASTRO: Markarian 231 and quasars everywhere

MRK 0231 is a very active galaxy in Ursa Major a bit less than a degree north of Alioth the star in the handle of the Big Dipper before the bowl. NED classifies it as SA(rs)c? pec; LIRG; SY1 Which says it is a luminous infrared galaxy with a Seyfert 1 nucleus. This is one step down from a quasar. Some papers call it a BAL quasar. BAL stands for Broad Absorption Line. Some say it is a starburst galaxy due to its strong IR emission others say this is just a characteristic of the very well fed black hole at its core. In any case this has to be the result of a nearly complete merger of two equal sized spiral galaxies. The AGN gives it a star-like core. So star-like the core appears to be a bright star. It gave me fits to process it in fact. The core is 10 times brighter than the disk of the galaxy just one second of arc away. I've never encountered a galaxy with such a powerful star-like core, especially one over a half billion light-years away.

This is a very well studied galaxy. Most major galaxies will have up to a dozen notes at NED. This one has 29 nearly all quite lengthy. I can't begin to recap them. If interested look this galaxy up at NED then click on the notes link, put on your hip waders and wade in. Many of the papers can be downloaded in their entirety. For a more readable article including an image of it by the Hubble space telescope (south up so rotated 180 degrees from my north up image) see: http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astro...quasars-winds/

Outside the star-like core to the south is a bright arc of stars not quite centered on the core. Likely this is due to the merging of two cores to make this galaxy. To the southwest is a much larger ring with 5 or 6 star clouds in it. Large, very faint plumes are seen to the south, east and a finely defined one to the north ending in a blob. It looks much like a distant galaxy but is not listed at NED at all, not even as part of a galaxy. I didn't really know what to make of it until I saw the HST image at the Sky and Telescope link above. It is a distant edge on galaxy, just not one listed at NED.

There are three absorption features between us and the galaxy listed at NED. These are intergalactic dust clouds that may be altering its color. They are at 220, 290 and 370 million light years so about midway between us and the galaxy.

The bright disk portion of the galaxy is about 85,000 light-years across. A rather good size galaxy. The plumes, while weak, give it a diameter of over 300,000 light-years. Much of the plume volume appears to be very weak in stars. Does this mean most have fallen back into the disk of the galaxy? I found nothing on why the plumes were so weak other than suggestions that it is due to the merger being virtually complete. So have all the bright stars in the plumes died leaving only faint ones? Unfortunately, the plumes are very weak and conditions were poor when I collected the color data. The plumes appear to be very red in some areas but slightly blue over all. This might fit with the age of the merger being long enough ago the hot bright blue stars have since died leaving mostly low luminance older stars. I just don't trust my color data enough to say. It was extremely weak and was pushed beyond reason.

How Arp missed including this one in his list I can't understand. Also Arp was fascinated by quasars near disturbed galaxies. He didn't buy the generally held view that the redshifts of quasars was due to the distance and the expansion of the universe. He though they were ejected from active galaxies. In this case there are 14 quasars (one a bit iffy) in the image. I didn't list the quasar candidates in the frame. That would have brought the total to nearly 30. I have my doubts many of these will prove to be real quasars so didn't include them. In any case NED had only 17 galaxies in the field with redshift and 14 quasars. I've never had a field with a ratio like that and the total quasar count is a record for my images I believe. I have to wonder what Arp would have made of their abundance around such an active peculiar galaxy! Did he know about it? Wish I knew.

14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' RGB=2x10', STL-11000XM, Paramount ME

Rick

Nice find Rick. I wonder it the halo is gas that was pushed out by the
blazing nucleus or the remains of a merger.

Stefan

"WA0CKY" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ...


MRK 0231 is a very active galaxy in Ursa Major a bit less than a degree
north of Alioth the star in the handle of the Big Dipper before the
bowl. NED classifies it as SA(rs)c? pec; LIRG; SY1 Which says it is a
luminous infrared galaxy with a Seyfert 1 nucleus. This is one step
down from a quasar. Some papers call it a BAL quasar. BAL stands for
Broad Absorption Line. Some say it is a starburst galaxy due to its
strong IR emission others say this is just a characteristic of the very
well fed black hole at its core. In any case this has to be the result
of a nearly complete merger of two equal sized spiral galaxies. The AGN
gives it a star-like core. So star-like the core appears to be a bright
star. It gave me fits to process it in fact. The core is 10 times
brighter than the disk of the galaxy just one second of arc away. I've
never encountered a galaxy with such a powerful star-like core,
especially one over a half billion light-years away.

This is a very well studied galaxy. Most major galaxies will have up to
a dozen notes at NED. This one has 29 nearly all quite lengthy. I
can't begin to recap them. If interested look this galaxy up at NED
then click on the notes link, put on your hip waders and wade in. Many
of the papers can be downloaded in their entirety. For a more readable
article including an image of it by the Hubble space telescope (south up
so rotated 180 degrees from my north up image) see:
http://tinyurl.com/ptmczez

Outside the star-like core to the south is a bright arc of stars not
quite centered on the core. Likely this is due to the merging of two
cores to make this galaxy. To the southwest is a much larger ring with
5 or 6 star clouds in it. Large, very faint plumes are seen to the
south, east and a finely defined one to the north ending in a blob. It
looks much like a distant galaxy but is not listed at NED at all, not
even as part of a galaxy. I didn't really know what to make of it until
I saw the HST image at the Sky and Telescope link above. It is a
distant edge on galaxy, just not one listed at NED.

There are three absorption features between us and the galaxy listed at
NED. These are intergalactic dust clouds that may be altering its
color. They are at 220, 290 and 370 million light years so about midway
between us and the galaxy.

The bright disk portion of the galaxy is about 85,000 light-years
across. A rather good size galaxy. The plumes, while weak, give it a
diameter of over 300,000 light-years. Much of the plume volume appears
to be very weak in stars. Does this mean most have fallen back into the
disk of the galaxy? I found nothing on why the plumes were so weak
other than suggestions that it is due to the merger being virtually
complete. So have all the bright stars in the plumes died leaving only
faint ones? Unfortunately, the plumes are very weak and conditions were
poor when I collected the color data. The plumes appear to be very red
in some areas but slightly blue over all. This might fit with the age
of the merger being long enough ago the hot bright blue stars have since
died leaving mostly low luminance older stars. I just don't trust my
color data enough to say. It was extremely weak and was pushed beyond
reason.

How Arp missed including this one in his list I can't understand. Also
Arp was fascinated by quasars near disturbed galaxies. He didn't buy
the generally held view that the redshifts of quasars was due to the
distance and the expansion of the universe. He though they were ejected
from active galaxies. In this case there are 14 quasars (one a bit
iffy) in the image. I didn't list the quasar candidates in the frame.
That would have brought the total to nearly 30. I have my doubts many
of these will prove to be real quasars so didn't include them. In any
case NED had only 17 galaxies in the field with redshift and 14 quasars.
I've never had a field with a ratio like that and the total quasar
count is a record for my images I believe. I have to wonder what Arp
would have made of their abundance around such an active peculiar
galaxy! Did he know about it? Wish I knew.

14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' RGB=2x10', STL-11000XM, Paramount ME

Rick


--
WA0CKY