Lockheed: 911 & Iran Contra: Illegal Arms Sales

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:49:37 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On the domestic level, current U.S. neutFLUSH

This is boring, tell us again how to get free energy from a welding
torch.

I think it's much more interesting that NASA is run by Lockheed.

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:51:59 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:49:37 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On the domestic level, current U.S. neutFLUSH

This is boring, tell us again how to get free energy from a welding
torch.

I think it's much more interesting that NASA is run by Lockheed.

Got any evidence for this assertion? How did you make this
determination?

Is Lockheed lying when they say they're in 'partnership' with NASA?

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:34:54 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:51:59 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:49:37 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On the domestic level, current U.S. neutFLUSH

This is boring, tell us again how to get free energy from a welding
torch.

I think it's much more interesting that NASA is run by Lockheed.

Got any evidence for this assertion? How did you make this
determination?

Is Lockheed lying when they say they're in 'partnership' with NASA?

They are a contractor, you silly person. How does the contractor run
the contractee?

Why does Lockheed state they are in 'partnership' with NASA?

Why does NASA need a partner like Lockheed who is an arms dealer and made
billions off war? And why does NASA need a partner who is also providing
the intelligence gathering for NSA/Echelon?

"The Dizzy Gash" wrote in message
...

[headers fixed]

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:34:54 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:51:59 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald"
wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:49:37 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald"
wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On the domestic level, current U.S. neutFLUSH

This is boring, tell us again how to get free energy from a welding
torch.

I think it's much more interesting that NASA is run by Lockheed.

Got any evidence for this assertion? How did you make this
determination?

Is Lockheed lying when they say they're in 'partnership' with NASA?

They are a contractor, you silly person. How does the contractor run
the contractee?

Why does Lockheed state they are in 'partnership' with NASA?

That's just corporate speak, you dizzy gash.

Why does NASA need a partner like Lockheed who is an arms dealer and made
billions off war? And why does NASA need a partner who is also providing
the intelligence gathering for NSA/Echelon?

Why not? What's wrong with gathering a little intell? Get that
alleged 200+ IQ out of your ass, you dizzy gash, and come up
with something concrete or be labled a kook. Oh, wait, too
late!

"The Dizzy Gash" wrote in message
...

[headers fixed]

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:34:54 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:51:59 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald"
wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:49:37 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald"
wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On the domestic level, current U.S. neutFLUSH

This is boring, tell us again how to get free energy from a welding
torch.

I think it's much more interesting that NASA is run by Lockheed.

Got any evidence for this assertion? How did you make this
determination?

Is Lockheed lying when they say they're in 'partnership' with NASA?

They are a contractor, you silly person. How does the contractor run
the contractee?

Why does Lockheed state they are in 'partnership' with NASA?

That's just corporate speak, you dizzy gash.

Why does NASA need a partner like Lockheed who is an arms dealer and made
billions off war? And why does NASA need a partner who is also providing
the intelligence gathering for NSA/Echelon?

Why not? What's wrong with gathering a little intell? Get that
alleged 200+ IQ out of your ass, you dizzy gash, and come up
with something concrete or be labled a kook. Oh, wait, too
late!

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 18:12:35 -0700, "Ugly Bob"
wrote:

[...]

Why does Lockheed state they are in 'partnership' with NASA?

That's just corporate speak, you dizzy gash.

Hi boobie! We were wondering when you're morph into one of your other MPD
alters!

So why can't NASA can't run their own space program without Lockheed?

Why does NASA need a partner like Lockheed who is an arms dealer and made
billions off war? And why does NASA need a partner who is also providing
the intelligence gathering for NSA/Echelon?

Why not? What's wrong with gathering a little intell?

okay boobie, but why does NASA need to illegally spy on US citizens who have
committed no crimes other than posting to Usenet?

Get that
alleged 200+ IQ out of your ass, you dizzy gash, and come up
with something concrete or be labled a kook. Oh, wait, too
late!

Nice strawmen arguments. But you still refuse to answer the questions,
boobie. Get back with me when you have something interesting to say.

Do you really believe that Echelon is operating in the national security
interests of the citizens of United States of America? If so, then why
didn't Echelon prevent the 911 attacks on the USA?

Do you have access to Lockheed's Echelon and are using Echelon for illegal
spying on Usenet participants and violating their privacy?

Why is the NSA being controlled by Lockheed?

Why is Lockheed hiding the extraterrestrial saucer at Groom Lake?

Why is Lockheed in partnership with NASA and why do they want to go to Mars?

And why would Echelon spy on US citizens when they've perpetrated no crime
except exercise their freedom of speech on Usenet which is granted by the US
Constitution?

And why is Echelon busy harassing and spying on US citizens instead of
preventing attacks on US citizens, such as 911?

Is the NSA operating in the best interests of the United States of America,
or in Lockheed's best interests?

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 18:12:35 -0700, "Ugly Bob"
wrote:

[...]

Why does Lockheed state they are in 'partnership' with NASA?

That's just corporate speak, you dizzy gash.

Hi boobie! We were wondering when you're morph into one of your other MPD
alters!

So why can't NASA can't run their own space program without Lockheed?

Why does NASA need a partner like Lockheed who is an arms dealer and made
billions off war? And why does NASA need a partner who is also providing
the intelligence gathering for NSA/Echelon?

Why not? What's wrong with gathering a little intell?

okay boobie, but why does NASA need to illegally spy on US citizens who have
committed no crimes other than posting to Usenet?

Get that
alleged 200+ IQ out of your ass, you dizzy gash, and come up
with something concrete or be labled a kook. Oh, wait, too
late!

Nice strawmen arguments. But you still refuse to answer the questions,
boobie. Get back with me when you have something interesting to say.

Do you really believe that Echelon is operating in the national security
interests of the citizens of United States of America? If so, then why
didn't Echelon prevent the 911 attacks on the USA?

Do you have access to Lockheed's Echelon and are using Echelon for illegal
spying on Usenet participants and violating their privacy?

Why is the NSA being controlled by Lockheed?

Why is Lockheed hiding the extraterrestrial saucer at Groom Lake?

Why is Lockheed in partnership with NASA and why do they want to go to Mars?

And why would Echelon spy on US citizens when they've perpetrated no crime
except exercise their freedom of speech on Usenet which is granted by the US
Constitution?

And why is Echelon busy harassing and spying on US citizens instead of
preventing attacks on US citizens, such as 911?

Is the NSA operating in the best interests of the United States of America,
or in Lockheed's best interests?

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 18:12:35 -0700, "Ugly Bob"
wrote:

[...]

Why does Lockheed state they are in 'partnership' with NASA?

That's just corporate speak, you dizzy gash.

Hi boobie! We were wondering when you're morph into one of your other MPD
alters!

Alexa now travels futher on the highway to kookville -- sockpuppet
accusations.


So why can't NASA can't run their own space program without Lockheed?

Why does NASA need a partner like Lockheed who is an arms dealer and made
billions off war? And why does NASA need a partner who is also providing
the intelligence gathering for NSA/Echelon?

Why not? What's wrong with gathering a little intell?

okay boobie, but why does NASA need to illegally spy on US citizens who have
committed no crimes other than posting to Usenet?

Get that
alleged 200+ IQ out of your ass, you dizzy gash, and come up
with something concrete or be labled a kook. Oh, wait, too
late!

Nice strawmen arguments. But you still refuse to answer the questions,
boobie. Get back with me when you have something interesting to say.

Caution: Alexa-screed du jour follows:

Do you really believe that Echelon is operating in the national security
interests of the citizens of United States of America? If so, then why
didn't Echelon prevent the 911 attacks on the USA?

Do you have access to Lockheed's Echelon and are using Echelon for illegal
spying on Usenet participants and violating their privacy?

Why is the NSA being controlled by Lockheed?

Why is Lockheed hiding the extraterrestrial saucer at Groom Lake?

Why is Lockheed in partnership with NASA and why do they want to go to Mars?

And why would Echelon spy on US citizens when they've perpetrated no crime
except exercise their freedom of speech on Usenet which is granted by the US
Constitution?

And why is Echelon busy harassing and spying on US citizens instead of
preventing attacks on US citizens, such as 911?

Is the NSA operating in the best interests of the United States of America,
or in Lockheed's best interests?


I already answered these; you apparently didn't like my answers.


-=-=-=-=-

Official AFA-B Bully, Pest, Antagonist, and Gubmint Disinformation Agent

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 18:12:35 -0700, "Ugly Bob"
wrote:

[...]

Why does Lockheed state they are in 'partnership' with NASA?

That's just corporate speak, you dizzy gash.

Hi boobie! We were wondering when you're morph into one of your other MPD
alters!

Alexa now travels futher on the highway to kookville -- sockpuppet
accusations.


So why can't NASA can't run their own space program without Lockheed?

Why does NASA need a partner like Lockheed who is an arms dealer and made
billions off war? And why does NASA need a partner who is also providing
the intelligence gathering for NSA/Echelon?

Why not? What's wrong with gathering a little intell?

okay boobie, but why does NASA need to illegally spy on US citizens who have
committed no crimes other than posting to Usenet?

Get that
alleged 200+ IQ out of your ass, you dizzy gash, and come up
with something concrete or be labled a kook. Oh, wait, too
late!

Nice strawmen arguments. But you still refuse to answer the questions,
boobie. Get back with me when you have something interesting to say.

Caution: Alexa-screed du jour follows:

Do you really believe that Echelon is operating in the national security
interests of the citizens of United States of America? If so, then why
didn't Echelon prevent the 911 attacks on the USA?

Do you have access to Lockheed's Echelon and are using Echelon for illegal
spying on Usenet participants and violating their privacy?

Why is the NSA being controlled by Lockheed?

Why is Lockheed hiding the extraterrestrial saucer at Groom Lake?

Why is Lockheed in partnership with NASA and why do they want to go to Mars?

And why would Echelon spy on US citizens when they've perpetrated no crime
except exercise their freedom of speech on Usenet which is granted by the US
Constitution?

And why is Echelon busy harassing and spying on US citizens instead of
preventing attacks on US citizens, such as 911?

Is the NSA operating in the best interests of the United States of America,
or in Lockheed's best interests?


I already answered these; you apparently didn't like my answers.


-=-=-=-=-

Official AFA-B Bully, Pest, Antagonist, and Gubmint Disinformation Agent

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 20:16:31 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 18:12:35 -0700, "Ugly Bob"
wrote:

[...]

Why does Lockheed state they are in 'partnership' with NASA?

That's just corporate speak, you dizzy gash.

Hi boobie! We were wondering when you're morph into one of your other MPD
alters!

Alexa now travels futher on the highway to kookville -- sockpuppet
accusations.


So why can't NASA can't run their own space program without Lockheed?

Why does NASA need a partner like Lockheed who is an arms dealer and made
billions off war? And why does NASA need a partner who is also providing
the intelligence gathering for NSA/Echelon?

Why not? What's wrong with gathering a little intell?

okay boobie, but why does NASA need to illegally spy on US citizens who have
committed no crimes other than posting to Usenet?

Get that
alleged 200+ IQ out of your ass, you dizzy gash, and come up
with something concrete or be labled a kook. Oh, wait, too
late!

Nice strawmen arguments. But you still refuse to answer the questions,
boobie. Get back with me when you have something interesting to say.

Caution: Alexa-screed du jour follows:

Do you really believe that Echelon is operating in the national security
interests of the citizens of United States of America? If so, then why
didn't Echelon prevent the 911 attacks on the USA?

Do you have access to Lockheed's Echelon and are using Echelon for illegal
spying on Usenet participants and violating their privacy?

Why is the NSA being controlled by Lockheed?

Why is Lockheed hiding the extraterrestrial saucer at Groom Lake?

Why is Lockheed in partnership with NASA and why do they want to go to Mars?

And why would Echelon spy on US citizens when they've perpetrated no crime
except exercise their freedom of speech on Usenet which is granted by the US
Constitution?

And why is Echelon busy harassing and spying on US citizens instead of
preventing attacks on US citizens, such as 911?

Is the NSA operating in the best interests of the United States of America,
or in Lockheed's best interests?


I already answered these; you apparently didn't like my answers.

Your answers contradict your intent.


-=-=-=-=-

Official AFA-B Bully, Pest, Antagonist, and Gubmint Disinformation Agent