A pure scientific site

Dear friend,

Regardly visit:

https://sites.google.com/site/scient...ofhamidvansari

I am a physicist having several innovations in physics (and also
mathematics).
The most important ones of them have been collected in the above site.
I've had much attempts for publishing some of them through physical
journals. If requested by email, you will find some of the viewpoints
of the referees of some of these journals about some of thes papers,
which show clearly that the framework of the papers is scientific.


Thanks for your attention

Hamid V. Ansari

"Hamid V. Ansari" wrote in message
...
Dear friend,

Regardly visit:

https://sites.google.com/site/scient...ofhamidvansari

I am a physicist having several innovations in physics (and also
mathematics).
The most important ones of them have been collected in the above site.
I've had much attempts for publishing some of them through physical
journals. If requested by email, you will find some of the viewpoints
of the referees of some of these journals about some of thes papers,
which show clearly that the framework of the papers is scientific.


Thanks for your attention

Hamid V. Ansari

If you are going to challenge Newton's third law then you've made an error.

You claim "We know that there is a force exerted on a wire carrying
electric current in a magnetic field, which is inward in the experiment
shown in Fig. 1."
We know that there is a force exerted in a magnetic field on a wire carrying
electric current, which is outward in the experiment shown in Fig. 1.

Of course "inward" and "outward" are ill-defined. You making the bar magnet
into a horseshoe magnet doesn't define "inward".



LAW III.
To every action there is always opposed an equal reaction; or the mutual
actions of two bodies upon each other are always equal, and directed to
contrary parts.

Whatever draws or presses another is as much drawn or pressed by that other.
If you press a stone with your finger, the finger is also pressed by the
stone. If a horse draws a stone tied to a rope, the horse (if I may so say)
will be equally drawn back towards the stone: for the distended rope, by the
same endeavour to relax or unbend itself, will draw the horse as much
towards the stone as it does the stone towards the horse, and will obstruct
the progress of the one as much as it advances that of the other.

If a body impinges upon another, and by its force change the motion of the
other, that body also (became of the quality of, the mutual pressure) will
undergo an equal change, in its own motion, towards the contrary part. The
changes made by these actions are equal, not in the velocities but in the
motions of bodies; that is to say, if the bodies are not hindered by any
other impediments. For, because the motions are equally changed, the changes
of the velocities made towards contrary parts are reciprocally proportional
to the bodies. This law takes place also in attractions, as will be proved
in the next scholium.

On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:18:04 -0700 (PDT), "Hamid V. Ansari"
wrote:

Dear friend,

Regardly visit:

https://sites.google.com/site/scient...ofhamidvansari

Nothing scientific about it. Just more crankdom.
_________________________________________________

Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com

..