|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
40th Anniversary of 2001:A Space Odyssey
Pat Flannery wrote: Has anyone watched the movie to see in which direction he's supposed to be running? You could check out the rotation direction when he climbs up to the core access corridor. (If it helps, the centrifuge is located at the end of a tunnel directly in back of the command deck and is aligned so that its axis of rotation sits at ninety degrees to the length of the ship - if the command sphere of the Discovery was the Earth, its front would be the North Pole, its widest point the Equator, and its attachment to the rest of the ship the South Pole. In the cutaway of it in my book, this puts the centrifuge at somewhere around the equator to 20 degrees south latitude. Surprisingly it is nowhere near the full diameter of the command sphere.) There's a cutaway of the Discovery command sphere on this page: http://www.projectrho.com/rocket/rocket3u.html on this one it gets nearer the outside of the sphere than it does in my my movie production design cutaway. Two interesting things about this design: 1.) Inside a spaceship, usable space is always at a premium... but the centrifuge has a very high "ceiling" between its floor and central rotation hub. There's room for at least a whole second floor in it that isn't being used. Concerns about inner ear problems as you get near the hub? If you are going to puke, it will probably be in that center hub, with your feet being pulled down toward one side, and your head being pulled down toward the other, like you are standing on your head as far as your inner ear goes. Combine that with the view into the non-rotating tunnel and I'd think that would get anyone ill. 2.) Every time the astronauts move around in it, it gets a bit out of balance. This is going to produce a wobble in its rotation that's going to propagate from the command sphere down the whole length of the ship - the amount will be tiny, but it's there. Pat |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
40th Anniversary of 2001:A Space Odyssey
On May 2, 1:17 pm, Pat Flannery wrote:
1.) Inside a spaceship, usable space is always at a premium... but the centrifuge has a very high "ceiling" between its floor and central rotation hub. There's room for at least a whole second floor in it that isn't being used. Concerns about inner ear problems as you get near the hub? Would seem logical to have that as a non-rotating space. Or, mechanically simpler, you could use it as a storage locker and spin down the rotating part when you want to get into it. But then you'd need a reaction wheel (second contra- rotating part?) or thrusters to handle the torque of spin up/down... Or maybe it does rotate and HAL drops the food out of the selected locker for you to catch. Oh, wait, I got it! The central part should be a storage locker that rotates the opposite direction as the outer crew ring. To get in there, you spin them both down, to recreate your artificial gravity you spin them both up at an appropriate rate, using the torque on the lockers to counterbalance that on the crew module. Combine with the food dropping idea and HAL has another way to kill the crew... flying cans of spam. |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
40th Anniversary of 2001:A Space Odyssey
On Fri, 02 May 2008 11:04:59 -0500, Pat Flannery
wrote: There is a attack variant of the Starfury, the Thunderbolt: http://www.shipschematics.net/b5/ima...hunderbolt.jpg ...but as B5 was intended to be a peaceful station it wasn't originally equipped with these, as the Starfuries were considered adequate for self defense. Later in the show, when things went to crap between Earth and B5, they did get some Thunderbolts from defecting EarthForce Alliance ships that joined their revolt. ....The other important difference is that the T-Bolts can't go into planetary atmospheres, while the Starfuries can. OM -- ]=====================================[ ] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [ ] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [ ] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [ ]=====================================[ |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
40th Anniversary of 2001:A Space Odyssey
On Thu, 1 May 2008 11:44:23 -0400, "Scott Hedrick"
wrote: One thing missing was a heavier bomber-type craft, like BG's Raptors. JMS is brilliant, but he can't think of everything (and didn't have the money for it, anyway). ....This was CGI, which should have made the money issue a bit less impacting. OM -- ]=====================================[ ] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [ ] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [ ] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [ ]=====================================[ |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
40th Anniversary of 2001:A Space Odyssey
On May 2, 3:32 pm, OM wrote:
On Fri, 02 May 2008 11:04:59 -0500, Pat Flannery wrote: There is a attack variant of the Starfury, the Thunderbolt: http://www.shipschematics.net/b5/ima...ter_thunderbol... ...but as B5 was intended to be a peaceful station it wasn't originally equipped with these, as the Starfuries were considered adequate for self defense. Later in the show, when things went to crap between Earth and B5, they did get some Thunderbolts from defecting EarthForce Alliance ships that joined their revolt. ...The other important difference is that the T-Bolts can't go into planetary atmospheres, while the Starfuries can. Exactly the opposite. The T-Bolts were the craft that attacked the settlements on Mars. The Starfuries had to stay out of Epsilon 3's atmosphere when it's defences fired on the research team's shuttle. Andre |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
40th Anniversary of 2001:A Space Odyssey
Derek Lyons wrote: Nope - you just drop them sequentially as each bay comes in line with the departure vector. This leaves 'em deployed in a very nice line. I've never seen B5, but the above solution was used in another novel (whose name currently escapes me). That's exactly how they did it on the show; the only direction where you can't launch them is straight above the station, as they would collide with the de-spun spine. B5 has 27-28 Starfuries ready for launch at any one time divided between the four Cobra launch bays, so they could get them all launched in around 1/2 minute if they wanted them all heading in the same direction at launch. If there was a real need, they probably would salvo launch them from all four Cobra Bays simultaneously, and let them maneuver into attack position on their own. In that case you should be able to get them all launched in around 10-12 seconds. (around 7 seconds based on launch rate, but you would have to avoid launching into the spine, which will slow things up some.) There are more Starfuries held in reserve, but I don't know how long it takes to get them ready to go. Pat |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
40th Anniversary of 2001:A Space Odyssey
|
#78
|
|||
|
|||
40th Anniversary of 2001:A Space Odyssey
OM wrote: ...The other important difference is that the T-Bolts can't go into planetary atmospheres, while the Starfuries can. That's backwards. Starfuries can't land on a planet but they can go into its outer atmosphere, and did do that a couple of times on the show, IIRC. Thunderbolts can go into atmospheres and land on planetary surfaces. Pat |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
40th Anniversary of 2001:A Space Odyssey
OM wrote: ...This was CGI, which should have made the money issue a bit less impacting. Way back in the pilot movie for B5 a ship was shown leaving the station escorted by two ships that looked sort of like the "Narcissus" lifeboat from "Alien". These appeared to be B5 fighters of some sort, that were fleshed out as Starfuries in the finished series. I wonder if the original ships that were in the "Cobra Bays" were "Cobras"? Pat |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
40th Anniversary of 2001:A Space Odyssey
Andre Lieven wrote: Exactly the opposite. The T-Bolts were the craft that attacked the settlements on Mars. The Starfuries had to stay out of Epsilon 3's atmosphere when it's defences fired on the research team's shuttle. There's nothing really stopping a Starfury going into the very outer atmosphere of a planet if it cut its velocity enough in relation to the planet's rotation not to experience entry heating, although it would have to face pretty much straight down while hovering on its four forward engines like was shown in that episode. Landing is a real problem due to it needing to come down tail first, and ending up resting on its ion trail suppressors mounted behind the four rear engines...in any sort of a serous gravity field, that would crush them. However in a low enough gravity field (like on a airless asteroid) that might be doable. Another concern would be that the atmosphere would screw up the operation of the particle thrust ion engines themselves - causing shorting? At least the side engines on the four pods run on some sort of high energy solid propellant; as to whether the front engines are solid or ion driven is not made completely clear in my references, but they seem to point toward them being solid. Here's JMS's comments on how Starfuries launch BTW: http://www.midwinter.com/lurk/find/Answers/answ75.html That's from this website: http://www.midwinter.com/lurk/lurker.html ....which has all the B5 questions categorized: http://www.midwinter.com/cgi-bin/lurkfind Pat |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mariner IV Mars fly-by 40th anniversary | kucharek | History | 2 | July 16th 05 11:44 AM |
Congratulations Proton on its 40th Anniversary! | Jacques van Oene | News | 0 | July 15th 05 09:37 PM |
Kubrick 2001: The Space Odyssey Explained | Scott M. Kozel | History | 10 | March 6th 05 10:50 PM |
Kubrick 2001: The Space Odyssey Explained | Scott M. Kozel | Space Shuttle | 7 | March 6th 05 10:50 PM |