|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Atomic bombs on Japanese cities
I'll appreciate anyone familiar with nuclear physics answering this
question. Here is a quote from a newspaper article on the atomic bombing of Nagasaki: "...delivered 10,000 pounds of Plutonium on the city." Is that figure correct? Thanks. Dennis |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
no_surrender never.net wrote:
I'll appreciate anyone familiar with nuclear physics answering this question. Here is a quote from a newspaper article on the atomic bombing of Nagasaki: "...delivered 10,000 pounds of Plutonium on the city." Is that figure correct? Nope, estimated size of the pit was 9 cm in diameter, and it weighed 6.2Kg - 13.5 pounds-ish. The whole FatMan BOMB weighed around 10,500 pounds Steve |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Well, folks, I got another one for you to cluck and chuckle over. A newsman
on one of our local radio stations today reported that the space shuttle would not be able to land today, but "will hover over us" until tomorrow. Two examples of science ignorance in the mainstream media in two days; can hardly wait until tomorrow. Cordially, Dennis "no_surrender never.net" wrote in message ... Thanks to all who replied. I think we were once again treated to bad science by inept reporters/writers. We get that all the time in amateur astronomy, my area interest. Cordially, Dennis "Saul Levy" wrote in message ... No way! We didn't have that much plutonium until much later. Saul Levy On Sun, 7 Aug 2005 09:28:25 -0400, "no_surrender never.net" wrote: I'll appreciate anyone familiar with nuclear physics answering this question. Here is a quote from a newspaper article on the atomic bombing of Nagasaki: "...delivered 10,000 pounds of Plutonium on the city." Is that figure correct? Thanks. Dennis |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
In ,
no_surrender never.net typed: Well, folks, I got another one for you to cluck and chuckle over. A newsman on one of our local radio stations today reported that the space shuttle would not be able to land today, but "will hover over us" until tomorrow. No, you have it wrong...according to BBC News 24, they came in to land at "their base" and bad weather caused them to "take a detour" to a different airport :-) And as I was typing this: "Now Discovery is down, engineers will be checking the extent of the damage caused by the foam." Some of these presenters are on half a mill per year :-( Thank goodness for access to NASA TV :-) Jo |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Jo wrote:
..according to BBC News 24, they came in to land at ................ Some of these presenters are on half a mill per year :-( ....of OUR license money !! Steve |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Astonishing, ain't it!!
Cordially, Dennis "Jo" wrote in message ... In , no_surrender never.net typed: Well, folks, I got another one for you to cluck and chuckle over. A newsman on one of our local radio stations today reported that the space shuttle would not be able to land today, but "will hover over us" until tomorrow. No, you have it wrong...according to BBC News 24, they came in to land at "their base" and bad weather caused them to "take a detour" to a different airport :-) And as I was typing this: "Now Discovery is down, engineers will be checking the extent of the damage caused by the foam." Some of these presenters are on half a mill per year :-( Thank goodness for access to NASA TV :-) Jo |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
steve Taylor wrote:
no_surrender never.net wrote: Here is a quote from a newspaper article on the atomic bombing of Nagasaki: "...delivered 10,000 pounds of Plutonium on the city." Is that figure correct? Nope, estimated size of the pit was 9 cm in diameter, and it weighed 6.2Kg - 13.5 pounds-ish. The whole FatMan BOMB weighed around 10,500 pounds Yes: it included a great deal of high explosive, in a massive spherical casing to direct the blast energy in a perfectly symmetrical implosion, so as to crush the plutonium core to critical density before the whole works disintegrated. Unlike the "Little Boy" enriched-uranium bomb that struck Hiroshima, the "Fat Man" design was so complex that it was deemed necessary to test one before using it, even though at the time there was only enough plutonium for two bombs (IIRC). -- Odysseus |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Odysseus wrote:
steve Taylor wrote: no_surrender never.net wrote: Here is a quote from a newspaper article on the atomic bombing of Nagasaki: "...delivered 10,000 pounds of Plutonium on the city." Is that figure correct? Nope, estimated size of the pit was 9 cm in diameter, and it weighed 6.2Kg - 13.5 pounds-ish. The whole FatMan BOMB weighed around 10,500 pounds Yes: it included a great deal of high explosive, in a massive spherical casing to direct the blast energy in a perfectly symmetrical implosion, so as to crush the plutonium core to critical density before the whole works disintegrated. Unlike the "Little Boy" enriched-uranium bomb that struck Hiroshima, the "Fat Man" design was so complex that it was deemed necessary to test one before using it, even though at the time there was only enough plutonium for two bombs (IIRC). -- Odysseus I shall never forget that utterly straight faced peace activist who carried the placard ... ' No more Hiroshima ' |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Odysseus" wrote...
in message ... steve Taylor wrote: no_surrender never.net wrote: Here is a quote from a newspaper article on the atomic bombing of Nagasaki: "...delivered 10,000 pounds of Plutonium on the city." Is that figure correct? Nope, estimated size of the pit was 9 cm in diameter, and it weighed 6.2Kg - 13.5 pounds-ish. The whole FatMan BOMB weighed around 10,500 pounds Yes: it included a great deal of high explosive, in a massive spherical casing to direct the blast energy in a perfectly symmetrical implosion, so as to crush the plutonium core to critical density before the whole works disintegrated. Unlike the "Little Boy" enriched-uranium bomb that struck Hiroshima, the "Fat Man" design was so complex that it was deemed necessary to test one before using it, even though at the time there was only enough plutonium for two bombs (IIRC). -- Odysseus Yes, i read that the US pulled off a ruse with the Japanese. Our intelligence led them to believe that we had a complete nuclear arsenal, with several nukes just waiting to be deployed. And that's basically how V-J day (and the end of WWII) came about... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-J_Day happy days and... starry starry nights! -- Tender hearts wear crying mask, With eyes and tears that burn, From their spot on Mars they ask, "When will they ever learn?" Indelibly yours, Paine http://www.savethechildren.org/ http://www.painellsworth.net |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
No, That was the weight of the total bomb.
no_surrender never.net wrote: I'll appreciate anyone familiar with nuclear physics answering this question. Here is a quote from a newspaper article on the atomic bombing of Nagasaki: "...delivered 10,000 pounds of Plutonium on the city." Is that figure correct? Thanks. Dennis |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Atomic bombs on Japanese cities | no_surrender never.net | Misc | 81 | September 8th 05 10:02 PM |
Ted Taylor autobiography, CHANGES OF HEART | Eric Erpelding | Policy | 3 | November 14th 04 11:32 PM |
Ted Taylor autobiography, CHANGES OF HEART | Eric Erpelding | History | 3 | November 14th 04 11:32 PM |
Bechtel Nevada: Control of the World's Largest Nuclear Weapons Facilities | * | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 2nd 04 05:29 PM |
Apollo 1 Fire Jokes | Pat Flannery | History | 17 | March 27th 04 06:22 AM |