With NASA of Today How long Would it Take To Go To TheMoon?

Mad Scientist wrote
Ray Vingnutte wrote:
All of them refer to government statements. You obviously didn't look

very hard. I am not going to waste my time responding to you
anymore.

That will be fine Mad, I wish you luck in whatever direction you feel
you may be heading.

This is my last response to you, since you don't bother to really do any
research on your own and lazily expect others to do it for you.

Again... it is not OUR job to do research to support YOUR position. Doh.

Mad Scientist wrote in

Please rephrase. This would be correctly stated as "thousands of
people worldwide have "CLAIMED" to have seen UFOs. There is no
physical evidence for UFOs (which you still have not defined, btw).

I notice that you Usenet sociopaths never tell off people like Wally
for harassment. I wonder why that is? If I am such a crackpot as he
suggests, then just ignore me. Afraid I might get some attention from
people that are new to astronomy? Is that what provokes you and him
to 'gang up' on my posts? No doubt it is.

What does that have to do with your failure to provide evidence to back up
your claims. You remember you talked about a straw man argument. Well,
congratulations, you have just employed one.

Obvious to whom? Eyewitness testimony is inherently unreliable.

So much for scientific observation in the scientific method.

No... so much for eyewitness testimony, which has NEVER been part of the
scientific method.

Mad Scientist wrote in

Kill file me. Do yourself a favour, its much quieter around here than
having to listen to your bull****.

ad hominem

You are obviously obsessed in your little corner of the universe.
Pitiful little person you are.

ad hominem

No you demonstrate harassment with everyone of your sick rants.

ad hominem

(For example we have eyewitness testimony from police officers
worldwide

Obvious to whom? Eyewitness testimony is inherently unreliable.

So much for scientific observation in the scientific method.

He's right. Eyewitness testimony is unreliable. Of course you beleive
pretty much anything that's said tghat agrees with your fantasy.

I see this statement only applies to UFO sightings, never in a court
of law.

NO, you don't see... Eyewitness testimony is accepted often in a court of
law. But never in the scientific method. Remember what you said 4 lines
ago... "so much for scientific observation in the scientific method?"

Mad Scientist wrote in

Wally recommends his hobby and life focus to others on line.

Irrelevant

Who said anything about secondary evidence verses primary evidence
there ****twaddle? I see this is where you twist things some more as
per your sociopathology?

ad hominem (I think... but I'm not clear on the definition of
"****twaddle")

Why would I want to keep up with your insanity?

ad hominem

Liar. That is all you will ever be, a liar and stinkin scoundrel.

ad hominem

Mad Scientist wrote in newsHDWc.8007$y5J1.4390
Paul Lawler wrote:
Mad Scientist wrote in

You are nothing but a sociopath full of crap. Now bugger off and let
the real men demonstrate real logic without hecklers harassing what is
an otherwise decent forum.

Okay Mad... I'll bite. Whom do you consider the "real men" in this
newsgroup?

You think life is a game don't you? No wonder the games of earth keep
going around in circles. People believe it is nothing more than a
'win-loose' situation.

Thanks for the cogent analysis of my character. Now how about answering
the question? Whom do you consider the "real men" in this newsgroup?

Mad Scientist wrote in

Paul Lawler wrote:

Sorry. He is neither a loon nor mad by advancing this argument. By
international treaty (to which the U.S. is a signator), there is no
"ownership" of the moon.

Then why put a flag up there, if not to 'rub it in every countries
face' that America is 'superior'? Who cares about treaties, they are
broken all the time by the signatories.

Okay great. Please provide eividence that the flag on the Moon has been
declared by ANY government (U.S. or otherwise) to be a declaration of
"ownerhship" of the Moon.

Paul Lawler wrote:

Mad Scientist wrote

Ray Vingnutte wrote:
All of them refer to government statements. You obviously didn't look

very hard. I am not going to waste my time responding to you
anymore.

That will be fine Mad, I wish you luck in whatever direction you feel
you may be heading.

This is my last response to you, since you don't bother to really do any
research on your own and lazily expect others to do it for you.


Again... it is not OUR job to do research to support YOUR position. Doh.

Yes it is your job to do your own research. Fact is you know it as well
as everyone else, that millions of people can say the exact same thing
but be oblivious to a thread where the exact same questions were already
answered. Do your own research, I am not going to do it for you.

Paul Lawler wrote:

Mad Scientist wrote in


Please rephrase. This would be correctly stated as "thousands of
people worldwide have "CLAIMED" to have seen UFOs. There is no
physical evidence for UFOs (which you still have not defined, btw).

I notice that you Usenet sociopaths never tell off people like Wally
for harassment. I wonder why that is? If I am such a crackpot as he
suggests, then just ignore me. Afraid I might get some attention from
people that are new to astronomy? Is that what provokes you and him
to 'gang up' on my posts? No doubt it is.


What does that have to do with your failure to provide evidence to back up
your claims. You remember you talked about a straw man argument. Well,
congratulations, you have just employed one.

More like your failure to look at the evidence. You can keep saying the
exact same thing and you only prove how out to lunch you are.



Obvious to whom? Eyewitness testimony is inherently unreliable.

So much for scientific observation in the scientific method.


No... so much for eyewitness testimony, which has NEVER been part of the
scientific method.

Your oberservation in this matter is unreliable.

Paul Lawler wrote:

Mad Scientist wrote in newsHDWc.8007$y5J1.4390

Paul Lawler wrote:

Mad Scientist wrote in

You are nothing but a sociopath full of crap. Now bugger off and let
the real men demonstrate real logic without hecklers harassing what is
an otherwise decent forum.

Okay Mad... I'll bite. Whom do you consider the "real men" in this
newsgroup?

You think life is a game don't you? No wonder the games of earth keep
going around in circles. People believe it is nothing more than a
'win-loose' situation.


Thanks for the cogent analysis of my character. Now how about answering
the question? Whom do you consider the "real men" in this newsgroup?

More games Paul?

Paul Lawler wrote:

Mad Scientist wrote in


Paul Lawler wrote:

Sorry. He is neither a loon nor mad by advancing this argument. By
international treaty (to which the U.S. is a signator), there is no
"ownership" of the moon.

Then why put a flag up there, if not to 'rub it in every countries
face' that America is 'superior'? Who cares about treaties, they are
broken all the time by the signatories.


Okay great. Please provide eividence that the flag on the Moon has been
declared by ANY government (U.S. or otherwise) to be a declaration of
"ownerhship" of the Moon.

More games Paul?