|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Ia our sun groing old before its time
Well, it was a rather dumb question to begin with really. Sol seems fine--it
predates you and will likely continue after you are gone. "Abdul Ahad" wrote in message om... I fantasize about newgroups not being occupied by people like you who are only able to regurgitate what the so-called (but never proven to be) experts have declared. So you don't believe in going to school and learning about scientific concepts from text books and teachers then? No, I haven't personally been around for 4.5 billion years, but I have a mind that can look at the universe, make logical deductions about other stars in similar and dis-similar leagues as our own Sun, look at stars at different stages of their evolution and life cycles, then *project* these observations and thoughts into the past, present and future. My statements are reasoned within limits of human capability. Are you capable of any of these things I wonder? If you are able to add comments that would be *useful* in some way to this group, then please do so. AA |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Ia our sun groing old before its time
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Ia our sun groing old before its time
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Ia our sun groing old before its time
Now comes onto the stage the idea that there is some sort of very
'heavy' dark matter which resides in the cores of galaxies (and other places). Do you suppose that this heavy dark matter was formed by the collision and fusion of lighter elements? Perhaps you never considered the origin of this 'heavy, dark matter'? We have experimental data that demonstrates beyond any reasonable doubt that heavy elements can decay into lighter daughter products. Did it ever occur to you that almost all elements are decay products of heavier elements? Or that heavy elements are not fusion products but fission products? If so, then, what could you say about the age of a star or of the Earth that was accurate? You don't say!!! You are clearly a man(?) of knowledge in this field of cosmic processes and elemental make up of stars & galaxies. Cosmology and Stellar Evolution are *not* areas of any specialism to me, so I regret not being able to engage in this conversation further. Not necessarily due to lack of knowledge or fascination, but because of time! I am sure there are other well versed people in this group, so you may want to take this further with some of them in a separate post on this news group. My original reply was merely stating that: the Solar flares of recent weeks is NOT a hugely abnormal phenomena in the grand scheme of how stars generally behave and that we should not overly concern ourselves with that. Obviously there are millions of additional bits of facts one could analyse, but the bottom line conclusion will be what I just said. cheers AA |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Ia our sun groing old before its time
Now comes onto the stage the idea that there is some sort of very
'heavy' dark matter which resides in the cores of galaxies (and other places). Do you suppose that this heavy dark matter was formed by the collision and fusion of lighter elements? Perhaps you never considered the origin of this 'heavy, dark matter'? We have experimental data that demonstrates beyond any reasonable doubt that heavy elements can decay into lighter daughter products. Did it ever occur to you that almost all elements are decay products of heavier elements? Or that heavy elements are not fusion products but fission products? If so, then, what could you say about the age of a star or of the Earth that was accurate? You don't say!!! You are clearly a man(?) of knowledge in this field of cosmic processes and elemental make up of stars & galaxies. Cosmology and Stellar Evolution are *not* areas of any specialism to me, so I regret not being able to engage in this conversation further. Not necessarily due to lack of knowledge or fascination, but because of time! I am sure there are other well versed people in this group, so you may want to take this further with some of them in a separate post on this news group. My original reply was merely stating that: the Solar flares of recent weeks is NOT a hugely abnormal phenomena in the grand scheme of how stars generally behave and that we should not overly concern ourselves with that. Obviously there are millions of additional bits of facts one could analyse, but the bottom line conclusion will be what I just said. cheers AA |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Ia our sun groing old before its time
unk wrote in alt.astronomy.solar:
I fantasize about newgroups not being occupied by people like you who are only able to regurgitate what the so-called (but never proven to be) experts have declared. You fantasize about non-experts. Experts can deduce a lot from the total mass of a star, fule consumption in the fusion process, observating other stars and using the scientific method to come to a theory about the possible age and possible future ahead of the Sun.. You don't have to follow a car for an hour to know something about its speed, and how many kph it's doing if it's passing you at a constant speed. You don't have be around for 100 million years to have some knowledge about the eating habits of dinosaurs. You don't have to read another messages from you to know that you have zilch understanding of the scientific method. -- CeeBee "I am not a crook" Google CeeBee @ www.geocities.com/ceebee_2 |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Ia our sun groing old before its time
unk wrote in alt.astronomy.solar:
I fantasize about newgroups not being occupied by people like you who are only able to regurgitate what the so-called (but never proven to be) experts have declared. You fantasize about non-experts. Experts can deduce a lot from the total mass of a star, fule consumption in the fusion process, observating other stars and using the scientific method to come to a theory about the possible age and possible future ahead of the Sun.. You don't have to follow a car for an hour to know something about its speed, and how many kph it's doing if it's passing you at a constant speed. You don't have be around for 100 million years to have some knowledge about the eating habits of dinosaurs. You don't have to read another messages from you to know that you have zilch understanding of the scientific method. -- CeeBee "I am not a crook" Google CeeBee @ www.geocities.com/ceebee_2 |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Ia our sun groing old before its time
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Ia our sun groing old before its time
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Ia our sun groing old before its time
"unk" wrote in message
... Now comes onto the stage the idea that there is some sort of very 'heavy' dark matter which resides in the cores of galaxies (and other places). Do you suppose that this heavy dark matter was formed by the collision and fusion of lighter elements? Perhaps you never considered the origin of this 'heavy, dark matter'? An interesting theory! So what you are saying is that it is possible that the dense individuals who post to this group, but bring no light to the discussion, were created by the fusion of individuals who were not dense, and could bring some light to a conversation. I think you are on track to discover your roots. Clear Skies Chuck Taylor Do you observe the moon? Try the Lunar Observing Group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lunar-observing/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SR time dilation on remote objects ? | Marcel Luttgens | Astronomy Misc | 560 | September 30th 04 12:59 AM |
How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. | Robert | Astronomy Misc | 133 | August 30th 04 01:31 AM |
Pioneer 10 rx error and tx frequencies? | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 132 | February 8th 04 09:45 PM |
Equation of Time - does it correct for speed of light? | cgbusch | Astronomy Misc | 25 | September 22nd 03 04:32 PM |
Incontrovertible Evidence | Cash | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | August 24th 03 07:22 PM |