|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
[fitsbits] Start of the 'INHERIT' Public Comment Period
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Arnold Rots wrote:
Back to the present discussion: I agree that it is a good idea to register the convention, but the exchanges make me wonder whether we should add some components to the registry for each convention: - An analysis on general useability; i.e., an explicit discussion of what will happen to a naive reader and what the prerequisites are for proper understanding - A general assessment as to whether the convention is recommended for general use The former could be provided by the submitter, the latter by the FWG. I am on the same line: we should document our past mistakes, but clearly mark them as mistakes to avoid (or at least limit ;-)) additionaly usage slipping in. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[fitsbits] Start of the 'INHERIT' Public Comment Period | Robert Hanisch | FITS | 3 | April 13th 07 09:37 AM |
[fitsbits] Start of the 'INHERIT' Public Comment Period | William Pence | FITS | 8 | April 8th 07 03:59 AM |
[fitsbits] Start of the 'INHERIT' Public Comment Period | Robert Hanisch | FITS | 0 | April 6th 07 01:00 AM |
[fitsbits] Start of the 'INHERIT' Public Comment Period | Rob Seaman | FITS | 0 | April 5th 07 11:57 PM |
[fitsbits] Start of the 'INHERIT' Public Comment Period | William Pence | FITS | 0 | March 23rd 07 08:06 PM |