|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Books lunatics hate
Joann Evans :
Kaido Kert wrote: [snip] For instance, its only me thinking that billions spent on yucca repository could be better invested in getting solar power sats up and operational instead. But building nuclear waste repositories obviously makes much more long-term economic and environmental sense. Not a good example. We would *still* have to deal with the existing high-level wastes somehow, no matter what other sources of energy we find. I don't see what is wrong with just a big concrete structure in the middle of Death Valley, glassify the waste and store it there. Costs would be low, the material is accessible if we find a need for it, and people don't wander by accident into the middle of Death Valley. (Ps. yes I know a few are dumb enought to do that, but they are going die anyway if they are in Death Valley) Plus I would love to see the anti-nuke protestors trying to deal with the heat. Earl Colby Pottinger -- I make public email sent to me! Hydrogen Peroxide Rockets, OpenBeos, SerialTransfer 3.0, RAMDISK, BoatBuilding, DIY TabletPC. What happened to the time? http://webhome.idirect.com/~earlcp |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Books lunatics hate
Earl Colby Pottinger wrote:
Joann Evans : Kaido Kert wrote: [snip] For instance, its only me thinking that billions spent on yucca repository could be better invested in getting solar power sats up and operational instead. But building nuclear waste repositories obviously makes much more long-term economic and environmental sense. Not a good example. We would *still* have to deal with the existing high-level wastes somehow, no matter what other sources of energy we find. I don't see what is wrong with just a big concrete structure in the middle of Death Valley, glassify the waste and store it there. Even better: Crush the wastes into a fine powder. Mix at a 1:10,000 mass ratio with concrete (and at a 1:50 mass ratio with non-radioactive powder of the same basic elementary materials), and form into 50 cm cubes. Then cast those cubes into the centers of 1 meter cubes of straight concrete. You now have a large structural block of concrete with a virtually undetectable and essentially unextractable radioactive component. Use those bocks, in their hundreds of thousands, to build up artificial island, dams, bridges, walls. -- Scott Lowther, Engineer "Any statement by Edward Wright that starts with 'You seem to think that...' is wrong. Always. It's a law of Usenet, like Godwin's." - Jorge R. Frank, 11 Nov 2002 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Books lunatics hate
Earl Colby Pottinger wrote:
I don't see what is wrong with just a big concrete structure in the middle of Death Valley, glassify the waste and store it there. Glassifying the waste just makes it harder to get at and mixes it up with a bunch of non radioactive material. Much better to keep it in compact, relatively pure form under active guard. That way when people finally figure out how to use it as a feedstock for some useful process it will be easy to get at. Even better would be transmutation into high activity short lifetime isotopes. Once the isotopes decay into something stable (which they will do in short order) you can either bury them or use them as feedstock for some industrial process. Since the resulting stable isotopes will tend to be oddball things which aren't very common there is a good chance of finding some interesting property or other that is commercially useful. Transmutation can be accomplished using the neutrons from D-D or D-T fusion, and the additional heat from the neutron capture and subsequenct decay of the isotopes gives an additional source of energy that allows you to run the fusion side at under Q=1, which is nice since nobody's exceeded Q=1 yet, and probably nobody will for quite a few years. This is also the best bet for getting fusion out from under the government funding model (which rewards slow progress towards ill-defined goals) and into the commercial funding model (which relentlessly drives towards what works). As it currently stands fusion promises to be a cash cow for universities and research institutions for the next three decades until it starts to get commercially viable, at which point someone will notice the neutrons and the resulting backlash will kill it. The best hope is to make a virtue out of a necessity (neutrons from the easy reactions) in the short term, and once we have real experience with running commercial fusion reactors develop the means to first reduce the neutron flux (D-He3) and then eliminate them entirely (p-B11). .......Andrew -- -- Andrew Case | | |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Books lunatics hate
Joann Evans :
Not a good example. We would *still* have to deal with the existing high-level wastes somehow, no matter what other sources of energy we find. True, but at least SPS could help keep an already-existing problem from getting steadily bigger over time. -- Regards, Mike Combs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- We should ask, critically and with appeal to the numbers, whether the best site for a growing advancing industrial society is Earth, the Moon, Mars, some other planet, or somewhere else entirely. Surprisingly, the answer will be inescapable - the best site is "somewhere else entirely." Gerard O'Neill - "The High Frontier" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Launch vehicle books for sale | Martin Bayer | Space Shuttle | 1 | May 2nd 04 09:32 AM |
Lunar base and space manufacturing books for sale | Martin Bayer | Space Shuttle | 0 | May 1st 04 04:57 PM |
Aerospace engineering and technology books for sale | Martin Bayer | Space Shuttle | 0 | May 1st 04 04:55 PM |
Essential Books | David Findlay | Space Science Misc | 16 | October 28th 03 11:24 PM |
Genuine College Diplomas - no essays, books or exams! | [email protected] | Space Science Misc | 0 | October 11th 03 02:06 AM |