chap 15, cosmic distribution of chemical elements #207 Atom Totalitytheory

As soon as I finish this 3rd ed., I start the 4th, because I am tired
of all the jumbled posts of various chapters.
I should do the 4th as a organizing of the 3rd so each chapter is well
defined.


COSMIC ABUNDANCE OF THE CHEMICAL ELEMENTS

The cosmic abundance of the elements suggested
by the Big Bang would predict
a lower abundance of hydrogen coupled with the age
prediction of the observable
universe. In the Big Bang model, all the other
elements were derived from
hydrogen nucleosynthesis. Considering the average
lifespan of a large star which
will terminate in a supernova explosion and the
maximum age of the observable
universe according to the Big Bang then it is math-wise
impossible to have the
uniformity and homogeneity spread of the elements
throughout the observable
universe and still maintain the cosmic abundance of
hydrogen. The three facts of
(1) the homogenous dispersal of the elements from
carbon on up (2) the prevalent
abundance of hydrogen (3) the maximum age of the
observable universe as
calculated by the Big Bang model, are mathwise
impossible.

The Big Bang model would predict a gradual
decline in abundance of the
elements concomitant with increase in atomic number.
What needs explanation in
the Big Bang model is the fact of increase in atomic
number with an increase in
abundance but with less stability than its neighboring
elements. The element
thorium and uranium are such elements. A PU model
would require differential
abundances of elements even though these elements have
a higher atomic number.
The reason-- the differential abundance of the
elements are required for
stability of successive atom totality and the case for
a purposeful-atom-
totality going towards a heavier element atom
totality. Biological evolution
which is nucleosynthesis is a purposeful process. We
would not be here now to
discuss a Plutonium Atom Totality if it was not for
the prevalence of thorium
and uranium inside the Earth heating-up the interior
and having caused mutation
of genetic material in the past. The abundance of the
radioactive elements is
required in the future for us to obtain huge supplies
of energy required for
heavy element nucleosynthesis.

The Big Bang model of the observable universe
predicts that the element
technetium with atomic number 43 by laws of math
probability must be more
abundant in the observable universe than the higher
odd numbered atomic elements
such as rhenium atomic number 75. A Big Bang model
would show at least one
nuclide of each mass number stable to radioactive beta
decay modes. Yet
technetium and promethium are counterexamples. An
atom built totality would
explain the abundance of thorium 90 and uranium 92 and
the depletion of
technetium 43 and promethium 61 in the observable
universe, because of a
purposeful-atom-totality.


Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies