|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
6 FACTS why Relativists are a bunch of liars
On 25 Aug, 11:49, "Dirk Van de moortel" dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com wrote: "Pmb" wrote in ... "Dirk Van de moortel" wrote in ... "Pmb" wrote in message ... "Dirk Van de moortel" wrote in ... "Pmb" wrote in message news:GeGdnTQOHsEDTFPbnZ2dnUVZ_gidnZ2d@comcast. com... "Dirk Van de moortel" wrote in ... "qbit" wrote in message ... FACT #1: A photon emitted at the Earth surface (ignoring air-resistance) and going up vertically into the space is SLOWER than a photon going straightforward in vacuum space; ie. slower than c. Reason: attraction by the Earth gravity. Some of us could make some very interesting and relatively subtle remarks about this statement, and no doubt some of us already did just that in the past, when you were using one of your previous identities. Your evidently arrogant attitude of refusal and inability to learn prohibited you to do anything useful with the responses and remarks given to you. So, apart from the negative attention you new get, what makes you stick around, other than some kind of sick masochism, and what makes you think that people should waste their time trying to help and educate an unwilling, ignorant, and obviously less gifted person you like you? Dirk Vdm Hi Dirk Do you see a problem with his post? Can you share that with me? I don't see any problem. I you carefully read my comment (perhaps a few times), you should realize that I see a severe problem with the *person* :-) Dirk Vdm I know you have a problem with the *person*. That's obvious. I was wondering if you had a problem with the physics? Perhaps you should read the first sentence of my original comment a few more times :-) Dirk Vdm Yup. All I can find about your objection to the post is this "Some of us could make some very interesting and relatively subtle remarks about this statement.." However I don't see an obvious error in that statement. I said that some of us could make some very interesting and relatively subtle remarks about this statement. That does not imply that are errors in the statement. That probably is because you (with your physics background) make some implicit assumptions about the wording of the statement, which the OP (as a higschool kid without the proper context) does not make. This happens all the time here, as you well know. I know there is a variability if iin photon speed with height. He may have got it backwards in that the photon is slowing down as it leaves the field. Is this what you were refering to Dirk? No. Why don't you have another guess? Hint: there are two interesting and subtle remarks to be made. One remark is sligtly relevant, the other is highy relevant and in fact essential. In your other replies on this thread you consistently forget to mention it. I can imagine that the other contextless posters are (and will probably remain forever) confused by this. Moortel Moortel only a few years ago your idiocies were still extremely efficient - your brothers even regarded you as a powerful hypnotist, not just a silly zombie. Things change quickly don't they Moortel Moortel. Pentcho Valev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
6 FACTS why Relativists are a bunch of liars | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 2 | August 25th 07 12:52 AM |
Are Relativists Zombies? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 11th 07 09:35 AM |
ON WHAT RELATIVISTS WILL SIT | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 58 | July 5th 07 09:36 PM |
NON-EINSTEINIANS AND ANTI-RELATIVISTS | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | May 12th 07 03:09 PM |
Liars In The Afterlife - FAQ | Curtis Croulet | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 27th 03 11:13 PM |