|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ON WHAT RELATIVISTS WILL SIT
http://starbulletin.com/2007/06/24/travel/story02.html
"You can't sit on Lincoln's lap, but you can sit on Einstein ... and even give him a kiss on the cheek." Pentcho Valev |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
ON WHAT RELATIVISTS WILL SIT
On Jun 24, 12:21 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
http://starbulletin.com/2007/06/24/travel/story02.html "You can't sit on Lincoln's lap, but you can sit on Einstein ... and even give him a kiss on the cheek." Pentcho Valev You really need to get over this Einstein fetish that you've developed. No one worships him more than you do. Otherwise, you wouldn't be so damn obsessed with him. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
ON WHAT RELATIVISTS WILL SIT
On Jun 24, 10:40 am, Igor wrote:
On Jun 24, 12:21 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote: http://starbulletin.com/2007/06/24/travel/story02.html "You can't sit on Lincoln's lap, but you can sit on Einstein ... and even give him a kiss on the cheek." Pentcho Valev You really need to get over this Einstein fetish that you've developed. No one worships him more than you do. Otherwise, you wouldn't be so damn obsessed with him. It is a principal object in physics today to promote the worship of the most successful physicists, both living and dead. I believe that Pentcho Valev has made a valid point. Shubee http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
ON WHAT RELATIVISTS WILL SIT
On Jun 24, 3:32 pm, Shubee wrote:
On Jun 24, 10:40 am, Igor wrote: On Jun 24, 12:21 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote: http://starbulletin.com/2007/06/24/travel/story02.html "You can't sit on Lincoln's lap, but you can sit on Einstein ... and even give him a kiss on the cheek." Pentcho Valev You really need to get over this Einstein fetish that you've developed. No one worships him more than you do. Otherwise, you wouldn't be so damn obsessed with him. It is a principal object in physics today to promote the worship of the most successful physicists, both living and dead. I believe that Pentcho Valev has made a valid point. Shubeehttp://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity True scientists don't worship other scientists. That's for the screwed up laymen to do. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
ON WHAT RELATIVISTS WILL SIT
On Jun 24, 3:32 pm, Shubee wrote:
On Jun 24, 10:40 am, Igor wrote: On Jun 24, 12:21 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote: http://starbulletin.com/2007/06/24/travel/story02.html "You can't sit on Lincoln's lap, but you can sit on Einstein ... and even give him a kiss on the cheek." Pentcho Valev You really need to get over this Einstein fetish that you've developed. No one worships him more than you do. Otherwise, you wouldn't be so damn obsessed with him. It is a principal object in physics today to promote the worship of the most successful physicists, both living and dead. I believe that Pentcho Valev has made a valid point. You believe many things that are at odds with reality. - Randy |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
ON WHAT RELATIVISTS WILL SIT
On Jun 24, 11:32 am, Shubee wrote:
On Jun 24, 10:40 am, Igor wrote: On Jun 24, 12:21 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote: http://starbulletin.com/2007/06/24/travel/story02.html "You can't sit on Lincoln's lap, but you can sit on Einstein ... and even give him a kiss on the cheek." Pentcho Valev You really need to get over this Einstein fetish that you've developed. No one worships him more than you do. Otherwise, you wouldn't be so damn obsessed with him. It is a principal object in physics today to promote the worship of the most successful physicists, both living and dead. I believe that Pentcho Valev has made a valid point. No, it isn't. But you wouldn't know this, since you got your dumb ass dropped out of grad school. Shubeehttp://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
ON WHAT RELATIVISTS WILL SIT
On Jun 25, 12:49 pm, Randy Poe wrote:
On Jun 24, 3:32 pm, Shubee wrote: It is a principal object in physics today to promote the worship of the most successful physicists, both living and dead. I believe that Pentcho Valev has made a valid point. You believe many things that are at odds with reality. - Randy The amount of deification and reverence required to elevate praise, propaganda and the rewrite of history, all the way up to worship, is a debatable question. But there is no way to refute the logic and fundamental equations of http://www.everythingimportant.org/r...ty/special.pdf Shubee |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
ON WHAT RELATIVISTS WILL SIT
On Jun 25, 7:36 pm, Shubee wrote:
On Jun 25, 12:49 pm, Randy Poe wrote: On Jun 24, 3:32 pm, Shubee wrote: It is a principal object in physics today to promote the worship of the most successful physicists, both living and dead. I believe that Pentcho Valev has made a valid point. You believe many things that are at odds with reality. - Randy The amount of deification and reverence required to elevate praise, propaganda and the rewrite of history, all the way up to worship, is a debatable question. But there is no way to refute the logic and fundamental equations ofhttp://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/special.pdf Of course not. Everything was mathematically justifiable, if poorly written. There simply isn't any physics, much less new physics. Shubee |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
ON WHAT RELATIVISTS WILL SIT
On Jun 25, 10:29 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Jun 25, 7:36 pm, Shubee wrote: On Jun 25, 12:49 pm, Randy Poe wrote: On Jun 24, 3:32 pm, Shubee wrote: It is a principal object in physics today to promote the worship of the most successful physicists, both living and dead. I believe that Pentcho Valev has made a valid point. You believe many things that are at odds with reality. - Randy The amount of deification and reverence required to elevate praise, propaganda and the rewrite of history, all the way up to worship, is a debatable question. But there is no way to refute the logic and fundamental equations of http://www.everythingimportant.org/r...ty/special.pdf Of course not. Everything was mathematically justifiable, if poorly written. There simply isn't any physics, much less new physics. And I claim that you are a ****-throwing chimpanzee who evidently doesn't understand that the Lorentz transformation contains physics. And of course my paper reveals a new physics. It explains the physics of nonlinear Lorentz-equivalent transformations. Presently, chimpanzee physicists believe that nonlinear transformations between inertial frames of reference destroy the homogeneity and isotropy of space and time. The purpose of my paper is to explain on a high school level why those chimpanzees are confused about simple things. Shubee http://www.everythingimportant.org/r...ty/special.pdf |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
ON WHAT RELATIVISTS WILL SIT
Shubee wrote:
On Jun 25, 12:49 pm, Randy Poe wrote: On Jun 24, 3:32 pm, Shubee wrote: It is a principal object in physics today to promote the worship of the most successful physicists, both living and dead. I believe that Pentcho Valev has made a valid point. You believe many things that are at odds with reality. - Randy The amount of deification and reverence required to elevate praise, propaganda and the rewrite of history, all the way up to worship, is a debatable question. But there is no way to refute the logic and fundamental equations of http://www.everythingimportant.org/r...ty/special.pdf In which case we'll have to add the Shooby name to the exclusive list of SPR posters with irrefutable claims. Doesn't it make you feel proud, Shooby, to be in the company of such profound thinkers as Seto, Wilson and O'Barr? Congratulations on your achievement. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PING Anti-Relativists: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, May 2007 | Art Deco[_6_] | Astronomy Misc | 3 | June 11th 07 02:14 PM |
NON-EINSTEINIANS AND ANTI-RELATIVISTS | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | May 12th 07 03:09 PM |
VVFWS NOMINATION: The Anti-Relativists | Art Deco[_6_] | Astronomy Misc | 123 | May 8th 07 04:20 PM |
VVFWS NOMINATION: The Anti-Relativists | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 0 | May 5th 07 11:42 AM |
VVFWS NOMINATION: The Anti-Relativists | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 0 | May 5th 07 11:31 AM |