Simple question about SR paradox

On May 27, 1:57 pm, Daryl McCullough wrote:
Ron Aikas says...
Tom Roberts wrote:

In relativity, clocks do not slow down due to any sort of motion.
It is only MEASUREMENTS of clock rates in other frames that vary.
When at rest in any inertial frame, any good clock will tick at
its standard rate."

Well, this obvious but it does not address the issue of the twins’
paradox. It is uttered as an attempt to hide the fallacy in the
twins’ paradox in order to allow the self-styled physicists to
continue worshipping Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar
who was already a known nitwit, a known plagiarist, and a known liar.
shrug

We have three clocks all moving only inertially.
Clocks 1 & 2 meet in passing when they both read zero.

Someone does not understand relative simultaneity. It is impossible
to identify two moving clocks as synchronized within relative
simultaneity. shrug

Here is an analogous "twin paradox" for Euclidean geometry.

The subject will be highways on a flat region on the
surface of the Earth. Let's pick an orientation, and
define the x-axis to run left to right, and the y-axis
to run at right angles to the x-axis.

Boo! It is silly trying to equate elapsed time with a length of
highway. It is no wonder mysticism is ever so abound among Einstein
Dingleberries. shrug

Even though velocity is relative, if one twin *changes* velocity
to reunite with the other twin, then *every* inertial coordinate
system will agree that the twin who changed velocity is younger.

The mismatch in elapsed times under the concept of the Lorentz
transform, ie: SR, only deal with relative speed, and since the
Lorentz transform deals with a segment of this so-called “geometry”,
one can fully integrate the whole damn thing to get to the bottom of
the picture where the past or the future event is very independent of
the current event in time dilation. Either Yours Truly is a genius or
the self-styled physicists are just so ****ing stupid, but since time
dilation is accumulative, there is no ****ing way in hell that any
solutions can exist to undo this mismatch in mutual time dilation.
Gee! shrug

For these who insists on the wonder of the turn-around, show Him
(Yours Truly) the mathematics of this silly claim, then. It did not
exist when Born pulled out of that claim from his ass without any
support from any mathematical analysis, and it will never do so.
shrug