what if paradox

"Twittering One" wrote in message
...

It is an aspect of maturity to deal rationally with inconsistencies, so--

Rage! Rage, rage against the dying of the NIGHT!

You also are cute, Ms. Z., but then, you were projecting, weren't you?

Dr. Yubiwan, Ph.D.


Not. I saw.
I record, I responded.
I heard.

_______
Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me!
A
HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo"http://journal
s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo/A


Be careful with "denial", Ms. Z.
You record, you responded.
You heard, you projected.

And then you denied.
Great poets must be, if nothing else, honest and sincere, for you are the
unsung leaders of Earth.

Dr. Yubiwan, Ph.D.

"Charles D. Bohne" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 18:49:45 GMT, "Dr. Yubiwan"
wrote:

You are at one and the same time, Mr. Bohne, a Janus-faced "stotting
tommie", and a confounded, blithering idiot.

I don't like you either, Dr. Fraud.

Of course, you don't, Mr. Bohne.

But you really Do, don't you.
You like me because I will be honest with you in spite of my appearance of
fantasy.
And you like Us because we represent, at least in ideology, your very life's
work.

Perhaps it would be clearer if you were to recognize the pun?
From "idiot" to "ideot" and then to ideologist--small leaps.
Reality will face you soon enough, Mr. Bohne.
Shall you face it back?

Or shall you continue to fall through the cracks with your pigeonholing?
Kooks are only as good as is their entertainment value.
Are you here to be entertained? or enlightened.
Perhaps both?

Charles D. Bohne, you and your species are in deep yogurt.
Swim well.

Dr. Yubiwan, Ph.D.

"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
Hi Dr. Yubiwan,PhD. Don't know what you posted was a compliment(but
I'll take it as one.) Came up with Plato and Aristotal to be a wise
guy with a little "humor" Could have mentioned "Claudius Ptolemy" He
after all lived in Alexandria,and that was a center of "intellectual"
life in his spacetime. His philosophy(thinking) was challenged by
Copernicus. My posting was to show thinking evolves,and the Google of
today is not the same Google of tomorrow. Glad you mentioned
Newton,Einstien and others to bring my evolving thinking post up to
almost up to "now" Bert


"Almost"?

And whose name or names would you include to bring us up to the moment?

Dr. Yubiwan, Ph.D.

Dr. Dingaling Ph.D wrote,

The only thing I really like to shrink is
ignorance.

Heya O all-wise and all-knowing one, there's a coupla questions that
have been asked of all the other members of Darla's 'Commitee'. They all
drew a blank. Big fat goose egg. Mebbe you can enlighten us, being as
how you're an ages-old spacefarer endowed with the deep secrets of the
cosmos.

1. What is the nature of space (not a description, but the _defining
explanation_ of _what space is_)?
2. What is the causal mechanism of gravity (not a description of its
effects, i.e., equations, metrics and 'curvature'), but the _explanation
of its causation_?

Certainly this is kindergarden stuff to your accrued wisdom, doc.

But if.... you would like your head
shrunk, then yes, I am qualified to do
that, too.

Duh..

oc

Hi Twitty How you ever came up with "Dunkin donuts' I'll never know(I
help build there first store many moons ago) You tickle me for I can
see a great mind lurking,and trying to make fun. Bert

Be careful with "denial", Ms. Z.
You record, you responded.
You heard, you projected.

And then you denied.
Great poets must be, if nothing else, honest and sincere, for you are the
unsung leaders of Earth.

Dr. Yubiwan, Ph.D.


Poets, their words trust as art.
But their words do not match their life.
Many a poet went mad,
but their words ring true.
Art is art, life is life.
Sometimes they overlap, often not.
A mirror instucts, but alas, it reverses.
You would get it by a car if you trusted
The mirror's right is real right.
To deny evil, rather than passively watch,
Is a necessity. Action is good.
Words are good.
Sometimes words are not enough,
More action must compliment, buttress,
The wisdom of words.
The weak cannot always fight for themselves ~
We must fight the battles for the weak,
Then when done, when all's safe,
We help the weak grow strong.
But we do not attempt to instruct the weak
In the midst of their being beaten,
For that is to allow evil to carry out its ends.



_______
Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me!
A
HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo"http://journal
s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo/A

Dr. Dingaling Ph.D wrote,

The only thing I really like to shrink is
ignorance.

Evil, pain, destruction, and agression
Also alleviate ignorance.
They are not right.
To bring useful truth, wisdom needed,
One teaches how to flourish without undoing,
Or destroying beyond a reasonable mean.
Excess, rarely survives.

_______
Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me!
A
HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo"http://journal
s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo/A

"Bill Sheppard" wrote in message
...
Dr. Dingaling Ph.D wrote,

The only thing I really like to shrink is
ignorance.

Heya O all-wise and all-knowing one, there's a coupla questions that
have been asked of all the other members of Darla's 'Commitee'. They all
drew a blank. Big fat goose egg. Mebbe you can enlighten us, being as
how you're an ages-old spacefarer endowed with the deep secrets of the
cosmos.

1. What is the nature of space (not a description, but the _defining
explanation_ of _what space is_)?
2. What is the causal mechanism of gravity (not a description of its
effects, i.e., equations, metrics and 'curvature'), but the _explanation
of its causation_?

Certainly this is kindergarden stuff to your accrued wisdom, doc.

oc


Of course, and you have already been answered.
Let me illustrate why you have yet to recognize the answers.

You answer the following, please, if you will.

1. What is the nature of life (not a description, but the _defining
explanation_ of _what life is_)?
2. What is the causal mechanism of pregnancy (not a description of its
effects, i.e., living things, freedom and 'responsibilities'), but the
_explanation of its causation_?

Certainly these are easier to answer than the questions you put to me.
If you answer them, I shall be happy to answer your questions--again--yet in
a format which will be more acceptable to you.

Dr. Yubiwan, Ph.D.

From Dorkter Dingaling Ph.D:

You answer the following, please, if you
will. ....If you answer them, I shall be
happy to answer your questions...
Certainly these are easier to answer
than the questions you put to me.

Naw, naw, no hedging pal. You're the one making the wild**sed claims
about being an ages-old spacefaring alien. You can establish your
credentials in short order by giving us the thumbnail sketch of the
explanation of _what space is_ and the causal mechanism of gravity. This
would be rudimentary stuff to your ken, and basic to your technology.
There's an old earthling saying, "put up or shaddup."
oc

Hi Dr Yubi PhD Today my ideals are Brian Greene,Witten,
Wheeler,Hawking, Schwartz,Weinberg,and Yau,Shing Tung. I have out lived
so many other great thinkers. I have out lived all my cleaver beer
drinking friends. If not for the internet I would only have my wife to
tell me I'm crazy. Bert Oops I left out Double-A,nightbat,and little
old me.(why not)