A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Monolith on Mars? Buzz goes nuts.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old August 8th 09, 06:38 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Monolith on Mars? Buzz goes nuts.

On Aug 6, 8:07*am, Pat Flannery wrote:
Well, here it is; make of it what you will:http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...monument-proof...
Monolith on Phobos also?
Buzz thinks so.
Here's a photo of it:http://palermoproject.com/Mars_Anoma...nomalies1.html
... bit round for a monolith. Looks more like a rock that was in the
same orbit as Phobos and settled onto its surface.
But nope, it is a monolith:http://palermoproject.com/Mars_Anoma...nomalies2.html
It's crap like this that makes you really appreciate Neal Armstrong
keeping his mouth shut, unlike the Buzzer.

Pat


Phobos, the odd little captured and thoroughly pulverized moon of Mars
that’s of such low average density and yet “nearly dark as coal” (at
roughly an albedo of 7%, is just a reflective/albedo rating of being
4% less reflective than our much odder Selene/noon at 11%). Depending
on illumination angle, surface coarseness or nearly soot like dusty
crystallization and of course water and various mineral composition,
terrestrial coal offers a range of 0.05 to 0.15 (5%15%). Also, it
seems with the terrific dynamic range of the modern CCD camera can
offer the deductive eyecandy of mineral fluorescence, of which our
physically dark moon has even more of such complex minerals and
collected deposits to offer. However, add in the near 50 story item
of a vertical rectangular anomaly that’s nicely parked on Phobos
(possibly deployed from that extremely long and narrow ET probe that
the Russian Phobos-II mission encountered), and you got yourself a
very interesting rock of an extremely dusty and otherwise low density
substance of darn little gravity (minimal to/from delta-V).

Of course our 1%10% semi-hollow Selene/moon is so much better yet,
and the Selene L1 (accommodating my LSE-CM/ISS) offers an ideal to/
from delta-V of zero.

Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
  #12  
Old August 9th 09, 09:41 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Monolith on Mars? Buzz goes nuts.

On Aug 8, 10:38*am, BradGuth wrote:
On Aug 6, 8:07*am, Pat Flannery wrote:

Well, here it is; make of it what you will:http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...monument-proof...
Monolith on Phobos also?
Buzz thinks so.
Here's a photo of it:http://palermoproject.com/Mars_Anoma...nomalies1.html
... bit round for a monolith. Looks more like a rock that was in the
same orbit as Phobos and settled onto its surface.
But nope, it is a monolith:http://palermoproject.com/Mars_Anoma...nomalies2.html
It's crap like this that makes you really appreciate Neal Armstrong
keeping his mouth shut, unlike the Buzzer.


Pat


Phobos, the odd little captured and thoroughly pulverized moon of Mars
that’s of such low average density and yet “nearly dark as coal” (at
roughly an albedo of 7%, is just a reflective/albedo rating of being
4% less reflective than our much odder Selene/noon at 11%). *Depending
on illumination angle, surface coarseness or nearly soot like dusty
crystallization and of course water and various mineral composition,
terrestrial coal offers a range of 0.05 to 0.15 (5%15%). *Also, it
seems with the terrific dynamic range of the modern CCD camera can
offer the deductive eyecandy of mineral fluorescence, of which our
physically dark moon has even more of such complex minerals and
collected deposits to offer. *However, add in the near 50 story item
of a vertical rectangular anomaly that’s nicely parked on Phobos
(possibly deployed from that extremely long and narrow ET probe that
the Russian Phobos-II mission encountered), and you got yourself a
very interesting rock of an extremely dusty and otherwise low density
substance of darn little gravity (minimal to/from delta-V).

Of course our 1%10% semi-hollow Selene/moon is so much better yet,
and the Selene L1 (accommodating my LSE-CM/ISS) offers an ideal to/
from delta-V of zero.

*Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”


Oops! looks like I killed this topic.

btw, what exactly was that Russian PHOBOS-II imaged item that promptly
terminated their mission?

~ BG
  #13  
Old August 12th 09, 03:47 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Monolith on Mars? Buzz goes nuts.

On Aug 6, 8:07*am, Pat Flannery wrote:
Well, here it is; make of it what you will:http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...monument-proof...
Monolith on Phobos also?
Buzz thinks so.
Here's a photo of it:http://palermoproject.com/Mars_Anoma...nomalies1.html
... bit round for a monolith. Looks more like a rock that was in the
same orbit as Phobos and settled onto its surface.
But nope, it is a monolith:http://palermoproject.com/Mars_Anoma...nomalies2.html
It's crap like this that makes you really appreciate Neal Armstrong
keeping his mouth shut, unlike the Buzzer.

Pat


What's the big deal? Venus offers a thousand fold better stuff.

Venus even offers a complex tarmac with a nearby township, plus a
nifty bridge and those multiple reservoirs.

~ BG
  #14  
Old August 12th 09, 07:28 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Monolith on Mars? Buzz goes nuts.

On Aug 6, 8:07*am, Pat Flannery wrote:
Well, here it is; make of it what you will:http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...monument-proof...
Monolith on Phobos also?
Buzz thinks so.
Here's a photo of it:http://palermoproject.com/Mars_Anoma...nomalies1.html
... bit round for a monolith. Looks more like a rock that was in the
same orbit as Phobos and settled onto its surface.
But nope, it is a monolith:http://palermoproject.com/Mars_Anoma...nomalies2.html
It's crap like this that makes you really appreciate Neal Armstrong
keeping his mouth shut, unlike the Buzzer.

Pat


What's the big freaking monolith deal about Mars or Phobos? Venus
still offers by far a thousand fold better stuff to look at, and at
least Venus offers renewable and geothermal energy to burn (so to
speak), as well as having all the raw elements of Earth except being a
whole lot easier to obtain, and there's certainly no real shortage of
water.

Venus offers a truly complex tarmac, along with a nearby township of
complex infrastructure and many other rational features, plus a nifty
nearby bridge that couldn't possibly be something natural, as well as
those multiple reservoirs (some rather nicely interconnected).

~ BG
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
This is NUTS ! Michael Tee[_2_] Amateur Astronomy 5 October 30th 08 04:03 PM
What about these nuts? michael Amateur Astronomy 19 April 11th 07 04:56 AM
Wetbacks, if you will believe Priscilla's monolith before hats, it will halfheartedly play the butcher, Moronic Righteous Usenetizen. Starlord Misc 0 May 4th 06 10:51 AM
Chinks, the bowl in the blunt monolith is the lentil that seeks firmly, Canadian Cowboy. Michael Baldwin, Bruce Misc 0 May 4th 06 10:21 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.