|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Starliner Telescopes
On Wednesday, January 17, 2001 at 11:07:50 AM UTC-5, wrote: StarLiner 'scopes had the best reputation in the late '70's. I wanted one back then, but I didn't have the scratch. I got a Cave 8" f/5.6 instead - also a fine telescope that I still use today. Actually, the best telescope for a person depends upon what they are going to do with it. Long f/ratios (f/10 and greater) are great for planetary viewing, but lousy for wide-field work or photography. Shmidt-Cass systems (like Celestron) suffer from field curvature, but they are very portable. Newtonians can be made faster (smaller f/ratio) but suffer from comatic aberration & collimation errors. Refractors are expensive and suffer from chromatic aberration, but an antique 6" f/15 W. D. Mogey refractor at Penn State U. in the early '70's gave the best planetary views I've ever seen. In article , (Fr Chas) wrote: I sold it back in 1977 via Brad Meyers in Seattle and purchased a new Celestron 14 from him. I regret selling the Starliner in that it was observatory quality, rock steady, and worm error was extremely small. And I sold it for approx. $2,000. However, it was not portable. I have some pictures to remember it by. I purchased a Mathis 12" drive base for the Celestron and am happy with that. But it does not have slewing capabilities or any of the new fancy electronic stuff. But, contrary to what I see on this site, that C-14 has excellent optics and has given me the best visual views of the planets I have seen. And I have had it set up alongside 18" reflectors @ f/5 and several 4" to 6" f/15 achromatic refractors and one 24" f/3.8 reflector. (Sorry for this long thread and I know folks can argue the advantages and disadvantages of short versus long focal lengths, types and general purposes of specific optics, and so forth.) Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ I can only say my experiences with star-liner were negative from the start. When I finally received my 10" scope in the summer of 1970 the cradle was broken. Brisley promised me a new cradle shipped out by express the next week. It never came! I had to wait four-and-half months to use my telescope. I also wanted an F7..he sent me an badly defective F5 with the worst optics I've ever seen. Because I was so dissatisfied he took the 10" back and for a few more dollars more shipped me a 12&1/2 inch which had the second worst mirror I've ever seen. This guy Brisley told me "turned edges" were normal....Huh?! I knew an amateur in my area who made great mirrors..he refigured it and English & Watson who coated the mirror said it was one of the best they'd tested...Finally! I gave up on star-liner and made the best of what I had until I could unload it after modifying the clock drive. The Star-Liner 12 1/2 mount was a piece of junk. I had two of their turned-edged mirrors and after talking to amateurs in California they said Brisley, all of his religious crap, and crummy telescopes were notorious in that era from the late 60s until they went out of business in 1981. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Starliner Telescopes
On Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 5:50:57 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Wednesday, January 17, 2001 at 11:07:50 AM UTC-5, wrote: StarLiner 'scopes had the best reputation in the late '70's. I wanted one back then, but I didn't have the scratch. I got a Cave 8" f/5.6 instead - also a fine telescope that I still use today. Actually, the best telescope for a person depends upon what they are going to do with it. Long f/ratios (f/10 and greater) are great for planetary viewing, but lousy for wide-field work or photography. Shmidt-Cass systems (like Celestron) suffer from field curvature, but they are very portable. Newtonians can be made faster (smaller f/ratio) but suffer from comatic aberration & collimation errors. Refractors are expensive and suffer from chromatic aberration, but an antique 6" f/15 W. D. Mogey refractor at Penn State U. in the early '70's gave the best planetary views I've ever seen. In article , (Fr Chas) wrote: I sold it back in 1977 via Brad Meyers in Seattle and purchased a new Celestron 14 from him. I regret selling the Starliner in that it was observatory quality, rock steady, and worm error was extremely small. And I sold it for approx. $2,000. However, it was not portable. I have some pictures to remember it by. I purchased a Mathis 12" drive base for the Celestron and am happy with that. But it does not have slewing capabilities or any of the new fancy electronic stuff. But, contrary to what I see on this site, that C-14 has excellent optics and has given me the best visual views of the planets I have seen. And I have had it set up alongside 18" reflectors @ f/5 and several 4" to 6" f/15 achromatic refractors and one 24" f/3.8 reflector. (Sorry for this long thread and I know folks can argue the advantages and disadvantages of short versus long focal lengths, types and general purposes of specific optics, and so forth.) Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ I can only say my experiences with star-liner were negative from the start. When I finally received my 10" scope in the summer of 1970 the cradle was broken. Brisley promised me a new cradle shipped out by express the next week. It never came! I had to wait four-and-half months to use my telescope. I also wanted an F7..he sent me an badly defective F5 with the worst optics I've ever seen. Because I was so dissatisfied he took the 10" back and for a few more dollars more shipped me a 12&1/2 inch which had the second worst mirror I've ever seen. This guy Brisley told me "turned edges" were normal....Huh?! I knew an amateur in my area who made great mirrors..he refigured it and English & Watson who coated the mirror said it was one of the best they'd tested...Finally! I gave up on star-liner and made the best of what I had until I could unload it after modifying the clock drive. The Star-Liner 12 1/2 mount was a piece of junk. I had two of their turned-edged mirrors and after talking to amateurs in California they said Brisley, all of his religious crap, and crummy telescopes were notorious in that era from the late 60s until they went out of business in 1981. Jim Lawrence |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Telescopes on the 'net ??? | Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names[_1_] | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | September 22nd 08 02:16 AM |
Telescopes Telescopes... | Brian | Amateur Astronomy | 121 | April 13th 04 05:32 AM |
Interferograms for Four High Quality Telescopes and Two Commercial Telescopes | Edward | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | January 11th 04 01:02 AM |
Starliner refractor? | Steve Hix | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | October 12th 03 02:07 AM |
Telescopes | Muff | Misc | 55 | August 8th 03 12:46 AM |