|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification
On Thu 2008/06/12 14:13:44 -0400, William Pence wrote in a message to: FITSBITS 1. Change the first sentence in section 8.1 from Rather than store world coordinates separately for each datum (e.g. as is done for random groups data), the regular lattice structure of a FITS image offers the possibility of defining rules for computing world coordinates at each point. to Rather than store world coordinates separately for each datum, one may define rules for computing world coordinates at each point. This change is not acceptable to me. The underlying basis of the world coordinate formalism is that the data has a regular structure, unlike random groups for example. Metrics don't come into it, at least not at this level. Regards, Mark |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification | Rob Seaman | FITS | 0 | May 30th 08 09:16 AM |
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification | Rob Seaman | FITS | 0 | May 30th 08 08:48 AM |
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification | Steve Allen | FITS | 0 | May 30th 08 04:55 AM |
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification | Mark Calabretta | FITS | 0 | May 30th 08 03:48 AM |
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification | Jonathan McDowell | FITS | 0 | May 29th 08 04:12 PM |