|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#131
|
|||
|
|||
Great missions STS-122 & Expedition 16
On Mar 7, 8:18 am, BradGuth wrote:
On Mar 7, 7:04 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote: On Mar 7, 6:41 am, BradGuth wrote: On Mar 6, 9:03 pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote: On Mar 6, 6:38 pm, BradGuth wrote:" Just like this time, I'm not making the effort to deal with your spendy science that hasn't paid off, other than in eye-candy. At a million hard earned dollars per frame, what's to show for it all? Other than tracking our obvious global warming, got any other results yet? What's lame is your pathetic excuses and lack of remorse on behalf of so many others going broke?" you make efforts to assign malicious motivations to my actions, with no logical rational explanation for your descriptions. Now you have continuously argued for increased access to information, but then you hypocritically criticize my actions of increasing access to information as spreading eye candy, sorry you cant have it both ways brad. I have been sharing information from the data gathered by experiments in our manned space program, meaning that my posts are attempting to get more use from the tax dollars already spent. Now such an action is not contrary to caring or even advancing arguments for social services as you have illogical argued, and therefore your character analysis of my actions and descriptions of my motivations fails. Are you saying that robotics in space couldn't have done an equal or better job of Earth imaging, at not 0.1% the cost of ISS? . - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - laughing, i find it funny that you have twisted my posts into the above statement, as i have pointed out your hypocrisy directly to your face and you could not address what i posted, you could only shift and run away to attack in another way. So yeah i find this funny as this is just another time i got you in this discussion and you could not admit it, instead you make illogical assertions which are nothing more than you attempting to protect your fragile ego. Now one would ask you why are you afraid of combing the observations made by iss crews, and those made from satellites, as the use of both can produce a synergy of scientific information when combined. Geat image of the South Patogonian Ice Field "The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth."http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/scripts/sseop/photo.pl?mission=ISS016&roll=E&... Astronaut Photography of Earth - Quick View ISS016-E-25117 S. PATAGONIAN ICE FIELD, LAKES Latitude: -50.0 Center Point Longitude: -73.0 image comes from the Image Science and Analysis Laboratory, NASA- Johnson Space Center. "The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth." No, you just don't like others asking viable questions, especially as to the given cost of that eye-candy, or as to the restricted access to those raw image files. What are you afraid of? . - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My fear is people not utilizing the information already accessible in the public domain, as tax payers have already spent the money on the images/data that are in the archives, and my sharing of information (providing links etc.) is simply trying to get the most science as possible from those images, you know the science you are afraid to acknowledge....Now your continuous hypocritical allegations, personal attacks, and denial of information, just doesn't stop at you clinging to your own ignorance, as you are making a very large effort to publicly reduce the validity/relevance of such images, and in effect attempting to discourage others from even being exposed to information you personally don't like (based on no logical grounds), actions which could be compared to "book burners" of the past.... Geat image of the South Patogonian Ice Field "The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth." Astronaut Photography of Earth - Display Record ISS016-E-10753 CHILE BENITO GL., ICE FIELD, GL. Latitude: -47.0 Center Point Longitude: -73.5 image comes from the Image Science and Analysis Laboratory, NASA- Johnson Space Center. "The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth." |
#132
|
|||
|
|||
Great missions STS-122 & Expedition 16
On Mar 7, 11:07 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
wrote: On Mar 7, 8:18 am, BradGuth wrote: On Mar 7, 7:04 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote: On Mar 7, 6:41 am, BradGuth wrote: On Mar 6, 9:03 pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote: On Mar 6, 6:38 pm, BradGuth wrote:" Just like this time, I'm not making the effort to deal with your spendy science that hasn't paid off, other than in eye-candy. At a million hard earned dollars per frame, what's to show for it all? Other than tracking our obvious global warming, got any other results yet? What's lame is your pathetic excuses and lack of remorse on behalf of so many others going broke?" you make efforts to assign malicious motivations to my actions, with no logical rational explanation for your descriptions. Now you have continuously argued for increased access to information, but then you hypocritically criticize my actions of increasing access to information as spreading eye candy, sorry you cant have it both ways brad. I have been sharing information from the data gathered by experiments in our manned space program, meaning that my posts are attempting to get more use from the tax dollars already spent. Now such an action is not contrary to caring or even advancing arguments for social services as you have illogical argued, and therefore your character analysis of my actions and descriptions of my motivations fails. Are you saying that robotics in space couldn't have done an equal or better job of Earth imaging, at not 0.1% the cost of ISS? . - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - laughing, i find it funny that you have twisted my posts into the above statement, as i have pointed out your hypocrisy directly to your face and you could not address what i posted, you could only shift and run away to attack in another way. So yeah i find this funny as this is just another time i got you in this discussion and you could not admit it, instead you make illogical assertions which are nothing more than you attempting to protect your fragile ego. Now one would ask you why are you afraid of combing the observations made by iss crews, and those made from satellites, as the use of both can produce a synergy of scientific information when combined. Geat image of the South Patogonian Ice Field "The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth."http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/scripts/sseop/photo.pl?mission=ISS016&roll=E&... Astronaut Photography of Earth - Quick View ISS016-E-25117 S. PATAGONIAN ICE FIELD, LAKES Latitude: -50.0 Center Point Longitude: -73.0 image comes from the Image Science and Analysis Laboratory, NASA- Johnson Space Center. "The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth." No, you just don't like others asking viable questions, especially as to the given cost of that eye-candy, or as to the restricted access to those raw image files. What are you afraid of? . - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My fear is people not utilizing the information already accessible in the public domain, as tax payers have already spent the money on the images/data that are in the archives, and my sharing of information (providing links etc.) is simply trying to get the most science as possible from those images, you know the science you are afraid to acknowledge....Now your continuous hypocritical allegations, personal attacks, and denial of information, just doesn't stop at you clinging to your own ignorance, as you are making a very large effort to publicly reduce the validity/relevance of such images, and in effect attempting to discourage others from even being exposed to information you personally don't like (based on no logical grounds), actions which could be compared to "book burners" of the past.... Geat image of the South Patogonian Ice Field "The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth." Astronaut Photography of Earth - Display Record ISS016-E-10753 CHILE BENITO GL., ICE FIELD, GL. Latitude: -47.0 Center Point Longitude: -73.5 image comes from the Image Science and Analysis Laboratory, NASA- Johnson Space Center. "The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth." Then by all means, you of all should insist upon our having access to each and everyone of those original unmodified and obviously spendy 18 MB image files, don't you think? How exactly is sharing the whole truth and nothing but the truth getting reinterpreted by way of your mindset as "book burners"? .. - Brad Guth |
#133
|
|||
|
|||
Great missions STS-122 & Expedition 16
On Mar 7, 11:25 am, BradGuth wrote:"Then by all
means, you of all should insist upon our having access to each and everyone of those original unmodified and obviously spendy 18 MB image files, don't you think? How exactly is sharing the whole truth and nothing but the truth getting reinterpreted by way of your mindset as "book burners"?" Laughing, your last statement is contrary to your actions, so please try and describe your actions with an objective point of view, rather than that creative writing you just engaged in with the above post. Pursue the truth, but you don't have to insult me, my posts, or the images i am posting links to, as you are posting negatives and acting like you are being positive, hardly the noble cause you pretend to be acting with as you stated above. Your posts are great spin, but not real, and most certainly not truthful, you see brad i completely disagree with your tactics as you have directed your attacks to me or anyone who shares information that you don't like. That is where you cross the line of noble in your pursuits, to acting with malice. Another Great image of the South Patogonian Ice Field "The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth." http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/scripts/sseo...=E&frame=25129 Astronaut Photography of Earth - Display Record ISS016-E-25129 ARGENTINA PAN-PATAGONIAN ICE FIELDS, L. Latitude: -48.5 Center Point Longitude: -72.5 image comes from the Image Science and Analysis Laboratory, NASA- Johnson Space Center. "The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth." |
#134
|
|||
|
|||
Great missions STS-122 & Expedition 16
On Feb 17, 7:04 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
wrote: On Feb 16, 3:51 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Feb 16, 12:35 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Feb 16, 9:40 am, "Joseph S. Powell, III" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Feb 16, 8:53 am, "Joseph S. Powell, III" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Feb 16, 6:46 am, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote: Great mission so far, awesome launch, incredible space walks (great views), and achieving a great accomplishment in space station assembly by adding the Columbus module to the structure. It's great to see both crews together, in the newly added Columbus module during today's joint crew news conference, enjoying their work. But the best part was just after ending the press conference both crews had a moment of fun play time as they spun and flipped around each other, it's great to see such a hardworking people having fun and laughing. Great mission and looking forward to a beautiful landing, thanks to all the work from the crews, and all of the people on the ground that are making this a successful mission.... Don't forget our DoD accomplishments of testing their latest ABL, as that too was another 100% great mission. Too bad there was never any communications between NASA and those of our Boeing team of Phantom Works, or those of Raytheon/TRW for that matter. It's as though DoD and of their ABL contractors were running their own show. . - Brad Guth ABL - is that for Air Bourne Laser, Anti-Ballistic Laser, or something else? ABL = Air Borne Laser (search for Phantom Works ABL) . - BG My most fervent wishes are for the SBL, but unfortunately these babies don't exist (officially). I agree, that a fleet of such ABLs of 100 MW or better laser beam capability is a darn good way to go, as the next best thing to any LEO star wars defensive capability, not to mention multiple other purely terrestrial DoD applications. BTW, officially TWA flight 800 wasn't taken out by friendly DoD fire. Officially the exploding TWA flight 800 simply defied the laws of physics. Officially we(US government) did absolutely nothing to bring about the 9/11 fiasco. Officially we've safely landed upon, walked upon and returned from our moon that's actually of rather pastel grays, offering 0.75 albedo in extensive areas, and otherwise our moon is pretty much a passive sort of place for human DNA to be for extended periods of time, as well as being impossible to ever see or much less include Venus within any unfiltered Kodak recorded FOV. Officially there's no sign or any physical indications of intelligent other life existing/coexisting on Venus. Officially JFK was taken out by one rouge individual, and for no apparent cold-war or NASA/Apollo related matters. Officially our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) is not after the market share or export control of Iraq's oil, coal and natural gas. Officially our FEMA accomplishes its job far better than any other government or private group could muster. Officially Steve Fossett is dead. . - Brad Guth I'd forgot about the matter of our officially being informed via mainstream media and by those in charge of most everything, that Jews supposedly didn't intentionally take out our USS LIBERTY ship and crew, all because of what they'd just done to their 6-Day war prisoners. Of course, long after the fact, we now officially realize such infowar disinformation was simply another perpetrated and mutually orchestrated lie upon lie from the very get-go. I have another dozen or so officially published matter of facts that seem not so truth worthy as we'd been informed. But then, when has our government not excluded evidence or not having outright lied to us. . - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Dude, i just started this thread to pay tribute to all the people who make the shuttle and station programs successful, not to the off topic discussion of the satellite shoot down. Our nation's space program is accomplishing great things and there are great people who deserve accolades, not the stuff you have strewn together here. I did not address your stuff here or previously as you tend to be over the top, i.e. your messenger posts and a color correction of saturation of +75 will make neon signs out of any gray tones, and not reveal anything meaningful, so your image processing work leaves something to be desired anyway. Now brad, yesterday was the fun day for both crews, and the today is the hatch closing day which is a little sadder, so im not feeling too happy right now, so you might want to keep you idiotic posts off of this thread....... Fine and dandy, if that's what makes you a happy camper, but I'll still put my observationology data-stream of 1.555 million full resolution frames per day as derived from my robotic Earth Viewing array of cameras up against your wussy dozen or so frames of minimal resolution and of restricted dynamic range that our spendy ISS delivers per day, that is when and if they feel like it or can even manage to find the time. BTW, such robotics in space can safely fly higher than ISS, if need be into the first Van Allen belt, as well as even trekking directly through the SAA without ever traumatizing one frail human DNA. Try that with ISS, and most of that brave crew w/o banked bone marrow are summarily screwed. I think my extremely low cost per frame and of those being of full resolution and maximum DR image files, as such are going to make the best of any Kodak moment via ISS look somewhat pathetic, not to mention spendy... .. - Brad Guth |
#135
|
|||
|
|||
Great missions STS-122 & Expedition 16
On Mar 7, 1:53 pm, BradGuth wrote:
Fine and dandy, if that's what makes you a happy camper, but I'll still put my observationology data-stream of 1.555 million full resolution frames per day as derived from my robotic Earth Viewing array of cameras up against your wussy dozen or so frames of minimal resolution and of restricted dynamic range that our spendy ISS delivers per day, that is when and if they feel like it or can even manage to find the time. BTW, such robotics in space can safely fly higher than ISS, if need be into the first Van Allen belt, as well as even trekking directly through the SAA without ever traumatizing one frail human DNA. Try that with ISS, and most of that brave crew w/o banked bone marrow are summarily screwed. I think my extremely low cost per frame and of those being of full resolution and maximum DR image files, as such are going to make the best of any Kodak moment via ISS look somewhat pathetic, not to mention spendy... . - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I think you just turned this discussion into a glorified race, not necessary, as my ego does not need to "win over" your opinion. But on the other hand, you seem to understand that you are using malicious ways on usenet as a means of communicating your opinions in a manner that is not as noble as you claim. Now given I have pointed out that your attacks, denials, and ego based challenges, are not justified by your supposed intentions, your rational for continuing to post is shown to be an obvious attempt to poison the topic of this thread, which is an act of malice. I don't need to have my words taken too seriously but this is something you repeatedly do on usenet, which is intentionally impeding the communication of information that is in the public domain, and since you have continuously publicly denigrated that information, and the person sharing that information, your malicious actions are serving a focused purpose and effecting many people, which is hardly a noble cause. Now you may think you are clever in repackaging and spinning your works of malice by asking and re-asking the same loaded questions, but your attempts are obvious, and once your arguments are stripped of their terrible logic, nothing but your malice remains. So just because you are unhappy with some information or you think something could or should be better, you have rationalized your malicious actions of attempting to poison information for everybody else, so therefore yes one could make a good argument that your actions are equivalent to a modern day usenet book burner.... Another Great image, but of the North Patogonian Ice Field this time. "The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth." Astronaut Photography of Earth - Quick View http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/scripts/sseo...=E&frame=24703 ISS016-E-24703 CHILE N. PATAGONIAN ICE FIELD, GL CHILE Latitude: -46.5 Center Point Longitude: -73.0 image comes from the Image Science and Analysis Laboratory, NASA- Johnson Space Center. "The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth." |
#136
|
|||
|
|||
Great missions STS-122 & Expedition 16
There's no race, just going for sharing the whole truth and nothing
but the truth. Obviously that's too far outside the box for your mindset. BTW, what exactly are you trying to prove by utilizing that solid block of text format? ? book burner ? Unlike yourself, I'm putting out book fires all the time. If I were in charge, I most certainly would have saved all 700 boxes of our NASA/Apollo mission files that supposedly contained much of our one and only cache of complex R&D plus loads of mission related science. ..- Brad Guth On Mar 7, 3:31 pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote: On Mar 7, 1:53 pm, BradGuth wrote: Fine and dandy, if that's what makes you a happy camper, but I'll still put my observationology data-stream of 1.555 million full resolution frames per day as derived from my robotic Earth Viewing array of cameras up against your wussy dozen or so frames of minimal resolution and of restricted dynamic range that our spendy ISS delivers per day, that is when and if they feel like it or can even manage to find the time. BTW, such robotics in space can safely fly higher than ISS, if need be into the first Van Allen belt, as well as even trekking directly through the SAA without ever traumatizing one frail human DNA. Try that with ISS, and most of that brave crew w/o banked bone marrow are summarily screwed. I think my extremely low cost per frame and of those being of full resolution and maximum DR image files, as such are going to make the best of any Kodak moment via ISS look somewhat pathetic, not to mention spendy... . - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I think you just turned this discussion into a glorified race, not necessary, as my ego does not need to "win over" your opinion. But on the other hand, you seem to understand that you are using malicious ways on usenet as a means of communicating your opinions in a manner that is not as noble as you claim. Now given I have pointed out that your attacks, denials, and ego based challenges, are not justified by your supposed intentions, your rational for continuing to post is shown to be an obvious attempt to poison the topic of this thread, which is an act of malice. I don't need to have my words taken too seriously but this is something you repeatedly do on usenet, which is intentionally impeding the communication of information that is in the public domain, and since you have continuously publicly denigrated that information, and the person sharing that information, your malicious actions are serving a focused purpose and effecting many people, which is hardly a noble cause. Now you may think you are clever in repackaging and spinning your works of malice by asking and re-asking the same loaded questions, but your attempts are obvious, and once your arguments are stripped of their terrible logic, nothing but your malice remains. So just because you are unhappy with some information or you think something could or should be better, you have rationalized your malicious actions of attempting to poison information for everybody else, so therefore yes one could make a good argument that your actions are equivalent to a modern day usenet book burner.... Another Great image, but of the North Patogonian Ice Field this time. "The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth." Astronaut Photography of Earth - Quick Viewhttp://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/scripts/sseop/photo.pl?mission=ISS016&roll=E&... ISS016-E-24703 CHILE N. PATAGONIAN ICE FIELD, GL CHILE Latitude: -46.5 Center Point Longitude: -73.0 image comes from the Image Science and Analysis Laboratory, NASA- Johnson Space Center. "The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth." |
#137
|
|||
|
|||
Great missions STS-122 & Expedition 16
On Mar 7, 5:46*pm, BradGuth wrote:
There's no race, just going for sharing the whole truth and nothing but the truth. *Obviously that's too far outside the box for your mindset. BTW, what exactly are you trying to prove by utilizing that solid block of text format? ? book burner ? *Unlike yourself, I'm putting out book fires all the time. *If I were in charge, I most certainly would have saved all 700 boxes of our NASA/Apollo mission files that supposedly contained much of our one and only cache of complex R&D plus loads of mission related science. .- Brad Guth On Mar 7, 3:31 pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote: On Mar 7, 1:53 pm, BradGuth wrote: Fine and dandy, if that's what makes you a happy camper, but I'll still put my observationology data-stream of 1.555 million full resolution frames per day as derived from my robotic Earth Viewing array of cameras up against your wussy dozen or so frames of minimal resolution and of restricted dynamic range that our spendy ISS delivers per day, that is when and if they feel like it or can even manage to find the time. BTW, such robotics in space can safely fly higher than ISS, if need be into the first Van Allen belt, as well as even trekking directly through the SAA without ever traumatizing one frail human DNA. *Try that with ISS, and most of that brave crew w/o banked bone marrow are summarily screwed. I think my extremely low cost per frame and of those being of full resolution and maximum DR image files, as such are going to make the best of any Kodak moment via ISS look somewhat pathetic, not to mention spendy... . - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I think you just turned this discussion into a glorified race, not necessary, as my ego does not need to "win over" your opinion. *But on the other hand, you seem to understand that you are using malicious ways on usenet as a means of communicating your opinions in a manner that is not as noble as you claim. *Now given I have pointed out that your attacks, denials, and ego based challenges, are not justified by your supposed intentions, your rational for continuing to post is shown to be an obvious attempt to poison the topic of this thread, which is an act of malice. *I don't need to have my words taken too seriously but this is something you repeatedly do on usenet, which is intentionally impeding the communication of information that is in the public domain, and since you have continuously publicly denigrated that information, and the person sharing that information, your malicious actions are serving a focused purpose and effecting many people, which is hardly a noble cause. *Now you may think you are clever in repackaging and spinning your works of malice by asking and re-asking the same loaded questions, but your attempts are obvious, and once your arguments are stripped of their terrible logic, nothing but your malice remains. *So just because you are unhappy with some information or you think something could or should be better, you have rationalized your malicious actions of attempting to poison information for everybody else, so therefore yes one could make a good argument that your actions are equivalent to a modern day usenet book burner.... Another Great image, but of the North Patogonian Ice Field this time. "The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth." Astronaut Photography of Earth - Quick Viewhttp://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/scripts/sseop/photo.pl?mission=ISS016&roll=E&... ISS016-E-24703 CHILE N. PATAGONIAN ICE FIELD, GL CHILE Latitude: -46.5 Center Point Longitude: -73.0 image comes from the Image Science and Analysis Laboratory, NASA- Johnson Space Center. "The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth."- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - all of which is fine and dandy but has nothing to do with you making malicious statements in this thread, or any other thread for that matter. Rationalizing your actions is a predictable action, but does not address your responsibility to not act in a malicious manner, as you have here. Now your hypothetical is just that, and does not address the focus of your malicious efforts, which are real and not contrived, so you are not fooling anybody with your spin and misrepresentations of your motivations. So once again just because you are unhappy with some information or you think something could or should be better, you have rationalized your malicious actions of attempting to poison information for everybody else, so therefore yes one could make a good argument that your actions are equivalent to a modern day usenet book burner.... |
#138
|
|||
|
|||
Great missions STS-122 & Expedition 16
On Mar 7, 6:12 pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
wrote: On Mar 7, 5:46 pm, BradGuth wrote: There's no race, just going for sharing the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Obviously that's too far outside the box for your mindset. BTW, what exactly are you trying to prove by utilizing that solid block of text format? ? book burner ? Unlike yourself, I'm putting out book fires all the time. If I were in charge, I most certainly would have saved all 700 boxes of our NASA/Apollo mission files that supposedly contained much of our one and only cache of complex R&D plus loads of mission related science. .- Brad Guth On Mar 7, 3:31 pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote: On Mar 7, 1:53 pm, BradGuth wrote: Fine and dandy, if that's what makes you a happy camper, but I'll still put my observationology data-stream of 1.555 million full resolution frames per day as derived from my robotic Earth Viewing array of cameras up against your wussy dozen or so frames of minimal resolution and of restricted dynamic range that our spendy ISS delivers per day, that is when and if they feel like it or can even manage to find the time. BTW, such robotics in space can safely fly higher than ISS, if need be into the first Van Allen belt, as well as even trekking directly through the SAA without ever traumatizing one frail human DNA. Try that with ISS, and most of that brave crew w/o banked bone marrow are summarily screwed. I think my extremely low cost per frame and of those being of full resolution and maximum DR image files, as such are going to make the best of any Kodak moment via ISS look somewhat pathetic, not to mention spendy... . - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I think you just turned this discussion into a glorified race, not necessary, as my ego does not need to "win over" your opinion. But on the other hand, you seem to understand that you are using malicious ways on usenet as a means of communicating your opinions in a manner that is not as noble as you claim. Now given I have pointed out that your attacks, denials, and ego based challenges, are not justified by your supposed intentions, your rational for continuing to post is shown to be an obvious attempt to poison the topic of this thread, which is an act of malice. I don't need to have my words taken too seriously but this is something you repeatedly do on usenet, which is intentionally impeding the communication of information that is in the public domain, and since you have continuously publicly denigrated that information, and the person sharing that information, your malicious actions are serving a focused purpose and effecting many people, which is hardly a noble cause. Now you may think you are clever in repackaging and spinning your works of malice by asking and re-asking the same loaded questions, but your attempts are obvious, and once your arguments are stripped of their terrible logic, nothing but your malice remains. So just because you are unhappy with some information or you think something could or should be better, you have rationalized your malicious actions of attempting to poison information for everybody else, so therefore yes one could make a good argument that your actions are equivalent to a modern day usenet book burner.... Another Great image, but of the North Patogonian Ice Field this time. "The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth." Astronaut Photography of Earth - Quick Viewhttp://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/scripts/sseop/photo.pl?mission=ISS016&roll=E&... ISS016-E-24703 CHILE N. PATAGONIAN ICE FIELD, GL CHILE Latitude: -46.5 Center Point Longitude: -73.0 image comes from the Image Science and Analysis Laboratory, NASA- Johnson Space Center. "The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth."- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - all of which is fine and dandy but has nothing to do with you making malicious statements in this thread, or any other thread for that matter. Rationalizing your actions is a predictable action, but does not address your responsibility to not act in a malicious manner, as you have here. Now your hypothetical is just that, and does not address the focus of your malicious efforts, which are real and not contrived, so you are not fooling anybody with your spin and misrepresentations of your motivations. So once again just because you are unhappy with some information or you think something could or should be better, you have rationalized your malicious actions of attempting to poison information for everybody else, so therefore yes one could make a good argument that your actions are equivalent to a modern day usenet book burner.... You either just don't get it, or you're one of them. Either way you are summarily dumbfounded past the point of no return. Why don't you just fork over each of those 18 MB image files? .. - Brad Guth |
#139
|
|||
|
|||
Great missions STS-122 & Expedition 16
On Mar 7, 7:38 pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Mar 7, 6:12 pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote: On Mar 7, 5:46 pm, BradGuth wrote: There's no race, just going for sharing the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Obviously that's too far outside the box for your mindset. BTW, what exactly are you trying to prove by utilizing that solid block of text format? ? book burner ? Unlike yourself, I'm putting out book fires all the time. If I were in charge, I most certainly would have saved all 700 boxes of our NASA/Apollo mission files that supposedly contained much of our one and only cache of complex R&D plus loads of mission related science. .- Brad Guth On Mar 7, 3:31 pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote: On Mar 7, 1:53 pm, BradGuth wrote: Fine and dandy, if that's what makes you a happy camper, but I'll still put my observationology data-stream of 1.555 million full resolution frames per day as derived from my robotic Earth Viewing array of cameras up against your wussy dozen or so frames of minimal resolution and of restricted dynamic range that our spendy ISS delivers per day, that is when and if they feel like it or can even manage to find the time. BTW, such robotics in space can safely fly higher than ISS, if need be into the first Van Allen belt, as well as even trekking directly through the SAA without ever traumatizing one frail human DNA. Try that with ISS, and most of that brave crew w/o banked bone marrow are summarily screwed. I think my extremely low cost per frame and of those being of full resolution and maximum DR image files, as such are going to make the best of any Kodak moment via ISS look somewhat pathetic, not to mention spendy... . - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I think you just turned this discussion into a glorified race, not necessary, as my ego does not need to "win over" your opinion. But on the other hand, you seem to understand that you are using malicious ways on usenet as a means of communicating your opinions in a manner that is not as noble as you claim. Now given I have pointed out that your attacks, denials, and ego based challenges, are not justified by your supposed intentions, your rational for continuing to post is shown to be an obvious attempt to poison the topic of this thread, which is an act of malice. I don't need to have my words taken too seriously but this is something you repeatedly do on usenet, which is intentionally impeding the communication of information that is in the public domain, and since you have continuously publicly denigrated that information, and the person sharing that information, your malicious actions are serving a focused purpose and effecting many people, which is hardly a noble cause. Now you may think you are clever in repackaging and spinning your works of malice by asking and re-asking the same loaded questions, but your attempts are obvious, and once your arguments are stripped of their terrible logic, nothing but your malice remains. So just because you are unhappy with some information or you think something could or should be better, you have rationalized your malicious actions of attempting to poison information for everybody else, so therefore yes one could make a good argument that your actions are equivalent to a modern day usenet book burner.... Another Great image, but of the North Patogonian Ice Field this time. "The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth." Astronaut Photography of Earth - Quick Viewhttp://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/scripts/sseop/photo.pl?mission=ISS016&roll=E&... ISS016-E-24703 CHILE N. PATAGONIAN ICE FIELD, GL CHILE Latitude: -46.5 Center Point Longitude: -73.0 image comes from the Image Science and Analysis Laboratory, NASA- Johnson Space Center. "The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth."- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - all of which is fine and dandy but has nothing to do with you making malicious statements in this thread, or any other thread for that matter. Rationalizing your actions is a predictable action, but does not address your responsibility to not act in a malicious manner, as you have here. Now your hypothetical is just that, and does not address the focus of your malicious efforts, which are real and not contrived, so you are not fooling anybody with your spin and misrepresentations of your motivations. So once again just because you are unhappy with some information or you think something could or should be better, you have rationalized your malicious actions of attempting to poison information for everybody else, so therefore yes one could make a good argument that your actions are equivalent to a modern day usenet book burner.... You either just don't get it, or you're one of them. Either way you are summarily dumbfounded past the point of no return. Why don't you just fork over each of those 18 MB image files? . - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - False premise and failing logic. Additional personal attacks just further demonstrate your motivations are malicious, no matter how much you attempt to intellectualize, rationalize, and excuse them or yourself... |
#140
|
|||
|
|||
Great missions STS-122 & Expedition 16
On Mar 7, 9:28 pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
wrote: False premise and failing logic. Additional personal attacks just further demonstrate your motivations are malicious, no matter how much you attempt to intellectualize, rationalize, and excuse them or yourself... If that's your best born-again opinion, and you're still a happy brown- nosed camper, then so be it. Silly old me, I always thought that public funded physics R&D and of whatever's the best available science was of all such silly things PUBLIC! Who besides us taxpayers and of us public end-use consumers is footing the bill, paying for absolutely everything (including yourself) over and over, along with those full extended family benefits and of sustaining those nifty retirements with full health benefits to boot? .. - Brad Guth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Great missions STS-122 & Expedition 16 | columbiaaccidentinvestigation | Space Shuttle | 191 | March 11th 08 10:39 PM |
Expedition 14/Expedition 13/Ansari Farewells and Hatch Closure | John | Space Station | 0 | September 28th 06 09:58 PM |
Expedition 13/ Pontes/ Expedition 12 Joint Crew News Conference | John | Space Station | 0 | April 4th 06 03:42 PM |
Expedition 13/ Pontes/ Expedition 12 Joint Crew News Conference | John | Space Station | 0 | April 3rd 06 10:05 PM |