The mutual tidal radius of Sol~Sirius = ?

On Jul 7, 5:37 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Cactus Saul The Moon's gravity raises the Earth's water up by three
feet,and that begs this question. If the moon had an ocean how high
would the Earth's gravity raise it up . Can the Earth's gravity effect
very fine dust on the Moon? Is there anything on the moon to show the
Earth is only 140,000 miles away? How about direction of lava flow?
Bert

If the moon had a spin, the tidal force of 2e20 N/sec would have been
an absolutely impressive turn of events, so to speak. At a sixth the
gravity, if there was a Selene/moon 24 hour spin cycle, whereas such a
Selene/moon ocean tide would be perhaps worth 36 fold greater than
Earth's.

Our Selene/moon isn't spinning in relationship to Earth, and its crust
seems much older and a whole lot tougher than Earth's crust that's
relatively thin, as well as in places it seems our crust is leaking
earth-innards rather badly.

Earth is 98.5% fluid to the Selene/moon tidal force of 2e20 N/sec,
whereas the moon may be nearly solid to its lower density and much
cooler core.

Earth's central core is massive in its thorium/iron density, whereas
the Selene/moon core is of a somewhat lower density substance that's
most likely lacking in thorium/iron.

There's obviously a physical distortion or morph of our Selene/moon as
having been caused by this 2e20 N/sec worth of tidal force, although
its not likely causing the innards of our Selene/moon to move about
and warm up all that much, but just continually pulled towards Earth
so that one half of that orb has become a bit more distorted/bulged
and otherwise mascon/massive or compacted than the side that's
continually facing away from Earth.

We need those LUNAR-A 3D mappings of the Selene/moon interior before
much other deductive interpretations as to whatever's going on can
make any better sense. Don't expect much if anything informative or
much less insightful from the mutual likes of Saul Levy or rabbi Art
Deco.

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

BradGuth writes:

If the moon had a spin, the tidal force of 2e20 N/sec would have been
....
Earth is 98.5% fluid to the Selene/moon tidal force of 2e20 N/sec,

Force is measured in newtons (N), not "N/sec".

On Jul 7, 9:56 am, (Michael Moroney)
wrote:
BradGuth writes:
If the moon had a spin, the tidal force of 2e20 N/sec would have been
...
Earth is 98.5% fluid to the Selene/moon tidal force of 2e20 N/sec,

Force is measured in newtons (N), not "N/sec".

Thanks much for that mention. However, each and every second there is
2e20 N worth of tidal force that's holding onto our Selene/moon, or
vise versa.

I supposed if our Selene/moon were not in motion of orbiting Earth,
such as in GSO or otherwise Earth wasn't spinning while under the
influence of this mutual tidal force, as such the measured force (N)
would be forever independent of time and thus inert, perhaps a little
somewhat like when our Selene/moon is relocated to Earth L1 would cut
that (N) by a factor of 16.

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

On Jul 7, 9:56 am, (Michael Moroney)
wrote:
BradGuth writes:
If the moon had a spin, the tidal force of 2e20 N/sec would have been
...
Earth is 98.5% fluid to the Selene/moon tidal force of 2e20 N/sec,

Force is measured in newtons (N), not "N/sec".

Unless Earth and everything else is standing perfectly still, it's by
the second and otherwise by the hour if converting such tidal force
into the sorts of tidal flex that's worthy of global warming energy.

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

In article
,
BradGuth wrote:

On Jul 7, 9:56 am, (Michael Moroney)
wrote:
BradGuth writes:
If the moon had a spin, the tidal force of 2e20 N/sec would have been
...
Earth is 98.5% fluid to the Selene/moon tidal force of 2e20 N/sec,

Force is measured in newtons (N), not "N/sec".

Unless Earth and everything else is standing perfectly still, it's by
the second and otherwise by the hour if converting such tidal force
into the sorts of tidal flex that's worthy of global warming energy.

You need to go read up on the relationship between force and energy. Got
a high school textbook handy? No, I didn't think so.

--
Timberwoof me at timberwoof dot com http://www.timberwoof.com
"When you post sewage, don't blame others for
emptying chamber pots in your direction." ‹Chris L.

On Jul 20, 1:05 am, Timberwoof
wrote:
In article
,

BradGuth wrote:
On Jul 7, 9:56 am, (Michael Moroney)
wrote:
BradGuth writes:
If the moon had a spin, the tidal force of 2e20 N/sec would have been
...
Earth is 98.5% fluid to the Selene/moon tidal force of 2e20 N/sec,

Force is measured in newtons (N), not "N/sec".

Unless Earth and everything else is standing perfectly still, it's by
the second and otherwise by the hour if converting such tidal force
into the sorts of tidal flex that's worthy of global warming energy.

You need to go read up on the relationship between force and energy. Got
a high school textbook handy? No, I didn't think so.


You need to contribute a little something/anything that's on-topic and
constructive (the usual mainstream status quo flack doesn't count).

Doesn't tidal induced friction cause heat on the special conditional
physics world of Timberwoof?

Here on Earth, a passive or inert and thus unmoving solar system
without a stitch of tidal flex heating is not the norm.

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth