|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Well I hope Discovery has a good flight.
It seems to be having problems getting off the ground
even semi-safely. I really don't need to see another batch of astronauts dying. It seems the dreams of youth were just so much bunk. The human part of space is trapped in LEO. The other planets are at best the most bleak places and the some just alien and utterly unlivable for any tech I can imagine. The dogs are in after a night out in their houses and the snow.............................................. ............................Trig |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Well I hope Discovery has a good flight.
On Nov 25, 7:14*am, |"
wrote: It seems to be having problems getting off the ground even semi-safely. I really don't need to see another batch of astronauts dying. It seems the dreams of youth were just so much bunk. The human part of space is trapped in LEO. This is demoralizing. But there is still hope that humanity can reach beyond LEO. The other planets are at best the most bleak places and the some just alien and utterly unlivable for any tech I can imagine. ...Trig James Nicoll had an interesting blog: http://james-nicoll.livejournal.com/2766780.html "Personally I find the modern Solar System a richer and more interesting place that the Solar System as it was imagined in the 1960s and 1970s but I know I am probably in a minority here." and "Note that I was talking about the 1960s and 1970s, when models of the Solar System hit a nadir of tedium; nothing but radiation-soaked rocks, a hell hole world, some gas giants and Earth." For example, a few decades ago we believed the moon drier than a bone. Then Chandrayaan 1 and LRO found ice deposits at the poles. Cassini, Galileo and other probes have revealed amazing things about our gas giants and their moons. As a kid I liked to imagine alien plants and animals on Mars and Venus. I would have never guessed that Europa was a better candidate for being home to an eco system. I agree with Nicoll, the modern Solar System is a richer and more interesting place. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Well I hope Discovery has a good flight.
I agree with Nicoll, the modern Solar System is a richer and more interesting place. This applies to the whole Galaxy - in the 60s before the space program the standard Astronomy text had the moons in the solar system depicted as uninteresting hunks of rock, our moon had no resources, planetary formation was not understood but it was certain that very few stars had planets. One of the professors did original work on determining that we live in the arm of a spiral galaxy. I have a 1960s text which it's interesting to re-read now. Of course the other problem is the new version shows a much more interesting universe - but prides itself in the Intro on removing all the problems that required Calculus to solve - we now live in a richer but also somewhat dumber world. Val Kraut |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Well I hope Discovery has a good flight.
On Nov 28, 5:53*am, "Val Kraut" wrote:
I agree with Nicoll, the modern Solar System is a richer and more interesting place. This applies to the whole Galaxy - in the 60s before the space program the standard Astronomy text had the moons in the solar system depicted as uninteresting hunks of rock, our moon had no resources, planetary formation was not understood but it was certain that very few stars had planets. One of the professors did original work on determining that we live in the arm of a spiral galaxy. I have a 1960s text which it's interesting to re-read now. Some of the most exciting discoveries are anomalies that trash our earlier models. Generations ago it was the precession of Mercury thumbing it's nose at Newtonian mechanics. Today we see stars orbiting their galaxies at the wrong speeds. I'm hoping when we learn what dark matter is, it'll be a paradigm change rivaling Einstein's upheaval of Newtonian mechanics. Of course the other problem is the new version shows a much more interesting universe - but prides itself in the Intro on removing all the problems that required Calculus to solve - we now live in a richer but also somewhat dumber world. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Val Kraut It was interesting watching October Sky. The life of Homer Hickam portrayed in the movie was similar to mine. Grew up in a mining town where most everybody had two parents. No one lived on welfare. At school you sat and listened to the teacher. Sometimes we stole our parents booze & cigarettes but there was no meth, heroine, or crack. Now a lot of high school kids don't know their times tables, much less long division. Calculus and trig? Forget it. Even though our technology is more advanced, we no longer have what it takes to go to the moon. But these things run in cycles. Maybe a generation or two from now our testicles will grow back. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Well I hope Discovery has a good flight.
It was interesting watching October Sky. The life of Homer Hickam portrayed in the movie was similar to mine. Grew up in a mining town where most everybody had two parents. No one lived on welfare. At school you sat and listened to the teacher. Sometimes we stole our parents booze & cigarettes but there was no meth, heroine, or crack. Now a lot of high school kids don't know their times tables, much less long division. Calculus and trig? Forget it. Even though our technology is more advanced, we no longer have what it takes to go to the moon. Started out somewhat similar but on Long Island. Big deal in High School that some smoked cigarettes, didn't know anyone who drank before college. When the desk top computers first appeared my initial though was - now the student has the computational power to work really interesting problems and now just the one that were simple enough to do the math by hand. Redoing some courses with that capability would be a real learning experience. Nope - didn't happen that way. The problems got simpler, some got dropped in favor of discussion topics - no math at all. And now engineers trust the pre-packaged software answers without any understanding of the basic relationships. Real case - an engineer has a vacuum system with 4 pumps. The standard pumps are 750 liter/min and 1500 l/min. The computer says system requires 900 l/min. So he orders 4 of the 1500l/min units. But had he looked at the basic equation he would have realized that simply moving the pumps closer to the chamber - reduced line length - the 750 l/min pumps would have been OK. Can't help but wonder how many other cases there are out there. Val Kraut |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Well I hope Discovery has a good flight.
On 11/29/2010 4:01 AM, Val Kraut wrote:
It was interesting watching October Sky. The life of Homer Hickam portrayed in the movie was similar to mine. Grew up in a mining town where most everybody had two parents. No one lived on welfare. At school you sat and listened to the teacher. Sometimes we stole our parents booze& cigarettes but there was no meth, heroine, or crack. Did you catch the horrible tactical error he makes in talking to Werner von Braun? He congratulates him on the Vanguard satellite project. :-D Pat |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Well I hope Discovery has a good flight.
" Did you catch the horrible tactical error he makes in talking to Werner von Braun? He congratulates him on the Vanguard satellite project. :-D If you think about it the Vanguard provided something to compare the Jupiter-C to. The Vanguard mess had to contribute to von Braun being a legend in his time. I remember my thoughts at the time were something like - OK the stupid politicians finally let the A team loose and we finally have a US satellite in orbit. I remember being told by a teacher that we study History so we don't repeat the mistakes of the past. I guess that doesn't apply to politicians and government workers. Vanguard wasn't the last bad decision. Val Kraut |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Well I hope Discovery has a good flight.
Pat Flannery wrote:
Val Kraut wrote: It was interesting watching October Sky ... Did you catch the horrible tactical error he makes in talking to Werner von Braun? That might have actually happened. Even fans of the space program are not always aware of who works on what project. In retrospect it's pretty hilarious. Maybe it was deliberate humor at the time. Irony at it's most artistic. He congratulates him on the Vanguard satellite project. :-D It did in fact work out well for von Braun. He got called from working on ballistic missiles, which he had little long term interest in other than as a means to an end, to working on space shots, which had been his long term interest all along. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Having Abandoned The Hope Of Heaven, Post Christian Culture Has To Hope For Aliens And Space Travel | Sound of Trumpet[_4_] | Policy | 12 | August 8th 07 04:00 AM |
ASTRO: Hope Santa was good to you all | Rick Johnson[_2_] | Astro Pictures | 4 | December 27th 06 05:15 PM |
Discovery HAVE A SAFE AND GOOD LANDING | scaler | Space Shuttle | 7 | July 17th 06 02:13 PM |
Have A Safe Flight, Discovery | [email protected] | Space Shuttle | 3 | July 4th 06 07:55 PM |
Good Night I hope | Starlord | Amateur Astronomy | 12 | December 22nd 03 11:26 AM |