|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
SpaceX Falcon I Hold-Down Firing Scheduled
The first flight-ready Falcon I is on its pad at
Vandenberg. SpaceX is set to test fire the vehicle next week. Tom Cuddihy provided this link in another sci.space.policy thread. "http://www.lompocrecord.com/articles/2005/04/27/news/news08.txt" "4/27/05 A small rocket will undergo a big test next week when it will do everything but blast off from Vandenberg Air Force Base. If all goes well, a five-hour countdown will end Tuesday, May 3, with the Falcon rocket's first-stage engine firing - and then shutting down after a few seconds, the first time in recent memory that a flight-readiness firing has taken place at Vandenberg." .... "A five-hour countdown will kick off at 8 a.m. Tuesday with the quick firing expected by 1 p.m., assuming no weather-related or technical issues arise." .... "In the past few years, SpaceX has set up shop on an abandoned launch pad, Space Launch Complex-3 West, on south Vandenberg." .... They've maintained an austere launch facility to keep costs down, housing the rocket horizontally in a shelter reminiscent of a catering tent some 100 yards from the launch stand." "Even with a successful test Tuesday, a first launch must wait until after the West Coast's final Titan 4 launch because - in the event of a catastrophic failure - the military doesn't want the Falcon's fledgling flight going over its nearby launch pad." "SpaceX expects to be ready to launch within five days of the neighboring rocket's departure ... However, if Titan 4's launch date slips, SpaceX says it may move the Falcon's maiden liftoff to the Kwajalein Atoll in the central Pacific Ocean." "SpaceX, along with chief competitor Orbital Sciences Corp., recently received an "indefinite delivery-indefinite quantity" contract from the Air Force that could be worth up to $100 million. Between now and 2010, the Air Force plans to order rockets to ferry small satellites to space." - Ed Kyle |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I think that the test mentioned in the article is not the full duration
hold down firing they were planning to do, but the thrust termination test that was required by range safety. The falcon I will be the first rocket to launch from the continental US without a traditional flight termination system (aka bomb). Instead it will just have a thrust termination system. I read somewhere that the range safety people wanted to do a test of the thrust termination system prior to liftoff. I think that this is the test. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Rudiger,
interesting theory, that makes sense. I wonder if SpaceX even still plans on doing a full holddown test at all anyway. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
It seems that they will have ample time to do so since the air force
wants the final Titan off the pad before they can launch. The USAF seems to have no problems to have a fueled falcon near their Titan, so maybe they will do the full duration hold down firing in Vandenberg and then do the first actual launch from the marshall islands. Whatever they decide to do, I wish them luck. I will be inviting my colleagues to dinner to celebrate if they have a successful launch :-) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
R=FCdiger Klaehn wrote:
It seems that they will have ample time to do so since the air force wants the final Titan off the pad before they can launch. The USAF seems to have no problems to have a fueled falcon near their Titan, so maybe they will do the full duration hold down firing in Vandenberg and then do the first actual launch from the marshall islands. Here is a new SpaceX press release regarding a new $100 million contract win from the Air Force for an "indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity" of launches over a five year period. According to the release, the "system test firing" is set to occur tomorrow, Tuesday May 3. This looks to be one of the largest subsidies provided to a launcher start-up since Orbital Sciences first developed Pegasus. It is starting to look like Falcon may be around for awhile. Of course, it still must prove itself in flight! - Ed Kyle "http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/050502/lam104.html?.v=3D8" Press Release Source: Space Exploration Technologies Corporation SpaceX Awarded $100 Million Contract From U.S. Air Force for Falcon I Monday May 2, 2:08 pm ET EL SEGUNDO, Calif., May 2 /PRNewswire/ -- Space Exploration Technologies Corporation (SpaceX) has been awarded a $100 million IDIQ contract by the U.S. Air Force/Space and Missile Systems Center (SMC Detachment 12) for Responsive Small Spacelift (RSS) launch services. The purpose of this contract will be to provide low cost orbital launch vehicles and responsive (launch 12 months from award of basic contract) launch services, on a recurring basis, using a mature vehicle design and a commercially derived booster to meet mission/payload requirements. "We are grateful to the Air Force for the endorsement implied by awarding SpaceX a $100 million launch contract," said Elon Musk, CEO of SpaceX. "With our Falcon I launch vehicle, we expect to provide the Defense Department and other customers breakthrough improvements in cost and reliability." This is an indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract requiring flexibility in responding to unique technical requirements, vehicle quantity, and schedule changes. Work will be complete by April 2010. Falcon Status Both the first and second stage SpaceX engines have completed two full mission duration firings and will complete acceptance testing in the coming weeks at the company's 300-acre testing facility in McGregor, Texas. Falcon I has been shipped to the SpaceX launch facility, SLC 3W at Vandenberg Air Force Base and will undergo a system test firing on Tuesday, May 3. The maiden flight of Falcon I carrying TacSat-1 is scheduled to follow the launch of the last Titan IV from SLC 4 at Vandenberg Air Force Base. Assuming an on time departure of the classified Titan IV mission, SpaceX expects a launch window in late summer. The second Falcon I launch will be from the Kwajalein Atoll for DARPA, also in late summer. About SpaceX SpaceX is developing a family of launch vehicles intended to increase the reliability and reduce the cost of access to space by a factor of ten. Located in El Segundo, California, the company was founded by CEO Elon Musk in June 2002. SpaceX is the third company founded by Mr. Musk. Previously he co-founded PayPal, Inc., the world's leading electronic payment system, which sold to online auction giant eBay(TM) for $1.5 billion in 2002. More information about SpaceX can be found at SpaceX.com. Source: Space Exploration Technologies Corporation |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
To quibble, the nature of a government contract is not the same as a
subsidy. The two should not be confused. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Daniel Schmelzer wrote:
To quibble, the nature of a government contract is not the same as a subsidy. The two should not be confused. Technically true by most definitions of the word "subsidy", but the way I see it any money from the Government for space launch services, even if paid for services rendered, is a kind of subsidy (perhaps "support" is a better word) because the Government both prints the money and decides who does and does not get the money - and because in the launch services business there isn't enough non-government business to support a space launch services company. By establishing this IDIQ (Indefinite Quantity, Indefinite Delivery) contract with SpaceX, the government has decided that SpaceX gets a chance to stay in the space launch business. No commercial customers have done that. - Ed Kyle |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
The reason I'm being so pedantic is because this contract has a lot of
history. The Air Force was going to sole source the contract to SpaceX last summer (i.e., choosing winners and losers), right when SpaceX's challenge of Kistler's sole source contract from NASA was being decided at OMB. It was a ridiculous coincidence on its face, so the Air Force withdrew its plans and decided to take bids on the contract. One year later and SpaceX won the bid -- no big surprise. But its competitor Orbital Sciences also put in a bid on the program and won too. http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/...port/index.php I've not heard of the Raptor launcher. Maybe you have? The impact of this contract is, as you say, that SpaceX's market risk for the Falcon I goes from very high to moderate-to-low. But SpaceX won the contract because it had something of obvious good value to offer the Air Force well clear of what passes for market prices in this industry. In a strict sense, SpaceX is succeeding because of things it is doing, not because it is getting unfair support (subsidies) from the Air Force. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Ed Kyle wrote:
Technically true by most definitions of the word "subsidy", but the way I see it any money from the Government for space launch services, even if paid for services rendered, is a kind of subsidy (perhaps "support" is a better word) because the Government both prints the money and decides who does and does not get the money - and because in the launch services business there isn't enough non-government business to support a space launch services company. The money that the government prints doesn't go into the federal budget, and so has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not a government contract can be considered a subsidy. By establishing this IDIQ (Indefinite Quantity, Indefinite Delivery) contract with SpaceX, the government has decided that SpaceX gets a chance to stay in the space launch business. Do you have any evidence whatsover for this assertion? An IDIQ contract doesn't commit the government to spending any money at all; it just means that if the government decides to spend money all of the contracting paperwork and rigamarole has already been completed. No commercial customers have done that. To date, has SpaceX received more government money, or more commercial money? -jake |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Ed Kyle" wrote in message oups.com... Rüdiger Klaehn wrote: It seems that they will have ample time to do so since the air force wants the final Titan off the pad before they can launch. The USAF seems to have no problems to have a fueled falcon near their Titan, so maybe they will do the full duration hold down firing in Vandenberg and then do the first actual launch from the marshall islands. Here is a new SpaceX press release regarding a new $100 million contract win from the Air Force for an "indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity" of launches over a five year period. According to the release, the "system test firing" is set to occur tomorrow, Tuesday May 3. This is some of the best news for Space X I have heard. The Air Force paying for 10-20 launches is more then enough to get them started. Especially if some of this is just for launch data. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Access Update #111 04/05/05 2nd try | Henry Vanderbilt | Policy | 11 | April 27th 05 11:53 PM |
SpaceX -- Falcon I developmental testing complete | Tom Cuddihy | Policy | 10 | February 10th 05 05:44 PM |
SpaceX Falcon 1 unlikely to re-coup investment ! | k2 | Policy | 7 | August 27th 04 09:01 PM |
SpaceX announces details on Falcon V | Joe Strout | Policy | 32 | January 29th 04 01:48 AM |
SpaceX for Real? | ed kyle | Policy | 42 | December 15th 03 11:41 PM |