|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Color of the Universe is silverywhite like the element plutonium(JohnsHopkins)
File002n PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY Universe theory:
physics characteristics: color of the cosmos (JohnsHopkins Univ recent findings) by Archimedes Plutonium this is a return to website location www.iw.net/~a_plutonium --- Subject: Is 200,000 galaxies enough to match the silver colour of plutonium? color of Universe Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 14:42:17 -0600 From: Archimedes Plutonium Organization: whole entire Universe is just one big atom Newsgroups: sci.physics.electromag, sci.astro, sci.optics --- quoting http://www.reuters.com/news_article....StoryID=676227 --- WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Red-faced astronomers said Thursday they were mistaken when they reported that the universe is light green. It's really beige. "It was more colorful than it should have been, unfortunately," said Ivan Baldry, a post-doctoral fellow at Johns Hopkins University who co-authored the scholarly paper that gave the color of all the light in the universe. "It's much closer to white, really," Baldry said in a telephone interview. "More like cream." Baldry and Karl Glazebrook, an assistant professor of astronomy at the university, presented data at a meeting of the American Astronomical Society in January finding that the color of the universe was a bit greener than pale turquoise. The notion of stating a definitive color of all the universe's light was a whimsical one, destined to be nothing more than a footnote in their final paper, Baldry said. Finding the color was a byproduct of an examination of some 200,000 galaxies to determine the rate of star birth as the universe aged. By giving a numeric value to the colors of the different galaxies, adding them together and then averaging them, they came up with their color, which they dubbed cosmic spectrum green. But soon after this finding was announced, Mark Fairchild at the Munsell Color Science Laboratories at the Rochester Institute of Technology in New York contacted them to say that the computer program the Hopkins astronomers used inappropriately had set a feature known as the "white point." The white point is the point at which light appears white to the human eye in different kinds of illumination. The Hopkins astronomers' white point was redder than it should have been, as if the universe was viewed under red neon light. "It's our fault for not taking the color science seriously enough," Glazebrook said in a statement. "I'm very embarrassed. I don't like being wrong, but once I found out I was, I knew I had to get the word out." The new color of the universe, as viewed from outside the universe from a dark environment, is very light beige, but Baldry and Glazebrook do not much care for that term. In an updated version of their findings, they showed a patch of a color just slightly darker than a white eggshell. "Good luck if you can see the difference between this color and white!" they wrote. "Suggestions for the name are welcome. As long as it is not 'beige'!" --- end quoting --- As the decades and centuries go by this measurement of the colour of the Universe will be refined and increased for accuracy. What they will find is that the colour of the Universe matches the silver colour of a plutonium atom. Not thorium, not uranium, not neptunium silver but only plutonium silver color matches the colour of the Universe. As for the Cosmic temperature of 2.71 Kelvin as measured by cosmic- background radiation. Well that already matches plutonium intrinsic thermodynamic temperature caused by Coulombic interactions. I just do not know if 200,000 galaxies is enough of a sample to pick out the silver colour of plutonium from the silver colour of its neighboring atomic elements such as uranium. But the future is wide open to refine the colour of the Universe. And I am personally curious as to how long scientists will take to become honest. Honest in changing the name from "beige" (which it is not) to that of silver color. Silver is a gray color; a mix of white and black. There will be a time lag before the news media changes the name beige to silver because to say the Universe is a silver color threatens all of those scientists who believe in the Big Bang theory. The Big Bang cannot accommodate any color to the universe. And due to the extreme hatred shown by most every human towards the Atom Totality theory, there will be reluctance to tell the truth. That beige is really silver color. --- Amazing that it was 2 years ago I made the above post, seems like only a year not 2. But anyway, I wanted to say that the color of the Universe is something that needs be measured and refined each year, sort of like a yearly checkup. The reason it is so important is because the color of the cosmos will match the color of plutonium. The Big Bang theory cannot reconcile color. The Atom Totality theory requires the color to match the element. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium www.archimedesplutonium.com whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Color of the Universe is silverywhite like the element plutonium (JohnsHopkins)
I couldn't disagree more. The color of space may be silvery white, and it's spectral signature may strongly resemble the spectrum of plutonium. However it is only marginally resembles the element putonium, if at all. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Color of the Universe is silverywhite like the element plutonium (JohnsHopkins)
John Schutkeker wrote in message .. .
I couldn't disagree more. The color of space may be silvery white, and it's spectral signature may strongly resemble the spectrum of plutonium. However it is only marginally resembles the element putonium, if at all. Sounds as if you are disagree with semantics. The JohnsHopkins researchers found a color for the Universe of a slight-silvery-whitish. The appearance of plutonium as an element is silvery-whitish. So if the Universe is one single big atom of plutonium where Earth and the night sky is the 5f6 where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies, then there would be some match of color of the cosmos and the plutonium sample held in one's hands. If the Universe were a Chromium Atom Totality and scientists measured the color then it would be a dazzling whitish color for we all know how dazzling white chromium is. What is counterintuitive to me is that the Cosmic Background Microwave Radiation increases the lower in atomic number you go. For example, in plutonium CBMR it is 2.74 Kelvin but in uranium it is higher and higher the further down one goes. Counterintuitive because one would think that with more electrons in an atom the temperature of an electron cavity would be larger. One would think that element 96 would have a higher temperature but instead it has a lower temperature from plutonium. And so the whitish color decreases as the atomic number increases. Archimedes Plutonium www.archimedesplutonium.com www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Color of the Universe is silverywhite like the element plutonium (JohnsHopkins)
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Color of the Universe is silverywhite like the element plutonium(JohnsHopkins)
Sat, 27 Mar 2004 02:54:36 GMT John Schutkeker wrote:
(Archimedes Plutonium) wrote in m: (snips) Sounds as if you are disagree with semantics. Actually, my disagreement was with the perceived sensationalism of the metaphor. Among anti-nuclear luddites, Plutonium is commonly known to be highly toxic, both chemically and radioactively, so it sounded like an inflammatory statement to me. I had actually heard that it had a slight greenish tinge, kind of like a soft pastel. The JohnsHopkins team forgot a optics factor and only months later gave a corrected version. They did not call it "whitish" but more of an "off-white". We can say the sight of pure refined plutonium is "off-white". So if the Universe is one single big atom of plutonium where Earth and the night sky is the 5f6 where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies, then there would be some match of color of the cosmos and the plutonium sample held in one's hands. I'd be very careful about this Universe = Single Atom idea that's so common. As it happens, that's just a metaphor that dates from the early days of big-bang cosmology and beat generation drug culture. If you take a Not really. If anyone had taken the idea seriously they would have said what chemical element it was. None of the BigBangers ever had the idea that the Universe is one big atom. But Democritus perhaps had the idea but had no idea of the Chemical Chart of Elements. survey of the PhD's in this group, you will most certainly hear the resounding statement that the universe is most definitely *not* a single People with great new ideas, seldom if ever get any positive responses from the so called community of intellectuals of that subject field. Democritus, Copernicus, Galileo and even in our recent century of Wegener. People with great new ideas quickly find out that the establishment is either too incalcitrant or too dumb or too much connected to paychecks. And, an idea is not great and new if the majority of College professors latch onto the new idea fastly. It is a great new idea if it takes the average College professor at least 2 or 3 centuries to realize it is "true". atom. That's just a convenient point of reference for people without any formal study in physics. Your waffling indicates you have little skill in physics. You might want to wander into a lecturer's office in your local university's physics department, and discuss the matter with him or her. The universe is a devil of a lot more complex than a single atom, and in fact contains about 10^80 single atoms, IIRC. I do not think I can teach you a fact, but will try nonetheless. Did you know that the complexity of a single plutonium atom in the Shrodinger Equation is so complex that if the entire planet Earth were a chain of supercomputers that they would be unable to compute simple physical parameters for any length of time. Just the number of Coulombic Interactions of the 94 protons to 94 electrons is of the order of 10^188 or another math person says 232!/2 which is vastly larger than the total number of elementary particles alleged to exist. So, quite definitely, one with an open mind (not your closed mind) can see that there is more going on inside one atom than what is going on in the entire macroworld. Your trouble John is that you do not want or know how to discuss this topic, but instead you want to brandish your prejudice. Archimedes Plutonium www.archimedesplutonium.com www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Color of the Universe is silverywhite like the element plutonium(JohnsHopkins)
ZZBunker wrote:
It's makes perfect sense, since CBMR concerns dissociated hygrogen and helium clouds, not Uranium clouds. And it only concerns Kelvin because QM people are more Background clueless than they are cosmic clueless. A quick glance into the night sky demonstrates that on average the universe is not bright enough to stimulate the color receptors in the human eye. So for humans, the universe on average cannot be directly seen as having any color. Amplified images can be made, but then we're just looking at glowing phosphors or illuminated pigments. Perhaps it does have an average color for some other beings with more sensitive sight. -- Lou Boyd |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Color of the Universe is silverywhite like the element plutonium (JohnsHopkins)
Louis Boyd wrote in message ...
ZZBunker wrote: It's makes perfect sense, since CBMR concerns dissociated hygrogen and helium clouds, not Uranium clouds. And it only concerns Kelvin because QM people are more Background clueless than they are cosmic clueless. A quick glance into the night sky demonstrates that on average the universe is not bright enough to stimulate the color receptors in the human eye. So for humans, the universe on average cannot be directly seen as having any color. Amplified images can be made, but then we're just looking at glowing phosphors or illuminated pigments. Perhaps it does have an average color for some other beings with more sensitive sight. But an quicker day sky demonstates that eyes aren't even needed to detect e-m radiation, nevermind color receptors of any type. The night sky is plenty bright to stimulate color receptors. Since we have to remind have astrologers and astronomers semi-daily anymore that refractors and robots are the key to success in science, not chemists. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Color of the Universe is silverywhite like the element plutonium (JohnsHopkins)
Archimedes Plutonium wrote in message ...
Finding the color was a byproduct of an examination of some 200,000 galaxies to determine the rate of star birth as the universe aged. By giving a numeric value to the colors of the different galaxies, adding them together and then averaging them, they came up with their color, which they dubbed cosmic spectrum green. This then led them to the erroneous conjecture that the universe is just one giant copper oxide molecule. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Archimedes Plutonium Is A Loser (Was: Color Of The Universe Is Like Plutonium)
Sigh... Well, nobody can say that I didn't try to light a single candle, before I set about cursing the darkness. Archimedes Plutonium wrote in : I'd be very careful about this Universe = Single Atom idea that's so common. As it happens, that's just a metaphor that dates from the early days of big-bang cosmology and beat generation drug culture. If you take a Not really. If anyone had taken the idea seriously they would have said what chemical element it was. None of the BigBangers ever had the idea that the Universe is one big atom. But Democritus perhaps had the idea but had no idea of the Chemical Chart of Elements. Here's a problem I'll bet you can't solve. Write down Schroedinger's Equation in its simplest form. C'mon, you can do it; it's only four symbols. Then write down the solution for the case of an electron in a potential well surrounded by an infinitely high energy barrier. That's the simplest known case, and I'll bet you can't even do that, Einstein, much less solve for spin/orbit coupling in a harmonic oscillator. Democritus you're not, Charlie. You self-taught guys make me crazy with your space-cadet theories. People with great new ideas, seldom if ever get any positive responses from the so called community of intellectuals of that subject field. Democritus, Copernicus, Galileo and even in our recent century of Wegener. People with great new ideas quickly find out that the establishment is either too incalcitrant or too dumb or too much connected to paychecks. And, an idea is not great and new if the majority of College professors latch onto the new idea fastly. It is a great new idea if it takes the average College professor at least 2 or 3 centuries to realize it is "true". Blah, blah, blah. Been there done that, wasted too much time on it already. atom. That's just a convenient point of reference for people without any formal study in physics. Your waffling indicates you have little skill in physics. Your finger pointing indicates that you have less. I'd pit my mathematical physics abilities against yours any day of the week, not in verbal arguments like this, but in classroom tests for university courses. I'd eat you for breakfast, Jack. You might want to wander into a lecturer's office in your local university's physics department, and discuss the matter with him or her. The universe is a devil of a lot more complex than a single atom, and in fact contains about 10^80 single atoms, IIRC. I do not think I can teach you a fact, but will try nonetheless. Did you know that the complexity of a single plutonium atom in the Shrodinger Equation is so complex that if the entire planet Earth were a chain of supercomputers that they would be unable to compute simple physical parameters for any length of time. Just the number of Coulombic Interactions of the 94 protons to 94 electrons is of the order of 10^188 or another math person says 232!/2 which is vastly larger than the total number of elementary particles alleged to exist. So, quite definitely, one with an open mind (not your closed mind) can see that there is more going on inside one atom than what is going on in the entire macroworld. Here's some advice for you: take an MIT level, introductory quantum physics class and call me in the morning, junior. Until then, you're plonked. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Space Shuttle | 3 | May 22nd 04 09:07 AM |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Space Station | 0 | May 21st 04 08:02 AM |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Policy | 0 | May 21st 04 08:00 AM |
The Colour of the Young Universe (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 19th 03 05:48 PM |
A dialogue between Mr. Big BANG and Mr. Steady STATE | Marcel Luttgens | Astronomy Misc | 12 | August 6th 03 06:15 AM |