![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() For the fact that action reaction violation need the change of the first law of newtonian inertia and for the fact that is in contact with the terrestrial environment https://neolegesmotus.wordpress.com/...s-another-law/ https://www.reddit.com/r/EmDrive/com...of_the_law_of/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/10/2016 7:37 PM, Non Newtonian Propulsion wrote:
For the fact that action reaction violation need the change of the first law of newtonian inertia and for the fact that is in contact with the terrestrial environment https://neolegesmotus.wordpress.com/...s-another-law/ It conveniently assumes that it's possible to change the charges on such a time-scale without the resulting magnetic fields totally negating the effect. A full analysis will show either that there's no net force, or that the change in momentum is matched by the momentum carried off as a result of a net radiation of electromagnetic waves in the opposite direction. Oh, and the fact that this thing will inevitably radiate electromagnetic waves means that it requires a constant input of power. Sylvia. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Il giorno giovedì 13 ottobre 2016 02:58:23 UTC+2, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 12/10/2016 7:37 PM, Non Newtonian Propulsion wrote: For the fact that action reaction violation need the change of the first law of newtonian inertia and for the fact that is in contact with the terrestrial environment https://neolegesmotus.wordpress.com/...s-another-law/ It conveniently assumes that it's possible to change the charges on such a time-scale without the resulting magnetic fields totally negating the effect. A full analysis will show either that there's no net force, or that the change in momentum is matched by the momentum carried off as a result of a net radiation of electromagnetic waves in the opposite direction. Oh, and the fact that this thing will inevitably radiate electromagnetic waves means that it requires a constant input of power. Sylvia. If one assumes that the principle of action and reaction can be overcome in electrodynamics it must accept the consequences also on the law of inertia.. And the change of the law of inertia is a great opportunity to shorten the time of interstellar travel E.Laureti |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Non Newtonian Propulsion wrote:
Il giorno giovedì 13 ottobre 2016 02:58:23 UTC+2, Sylvia Else ha scritto: On 12/10/2016 7:37 PM, Non Newtonian Propulsion wrote: For the fact that action reaction violation need the change of the first law of newtonian inertia and for the fact that is in contact with the terrestrial environment https://neolegesmotus.wordpress.com/...s-another-law/ It conveniently assumes that it's possible to change the charges on such a time-scale without the resulting magnetic fields totally negating the effect. A full analysis will show either that there's no net force, or that the change in momentum is matched by the momentum carried off as a result of a net radiation of electromagnetic waves in the opposite direction. Oh, and the fact that this thing will inevitably radiate electromagnetic waves means that it requires a constant input of power. Sylvia. If one assumes that the principle of action and reaction can be overcome in electrodynamics it must accept the consequences also on the law of inertia. And the change of the law of inertia is a great opportunity to shorten the time of interstellar travel E.Laureti Let's wait and see until they can provide an actually working lab demonstration of the principle. "we tried it with a microwave but we blew our microwave" does not sound like a very convincing attempt, to the contrary: it is what could have been expected by those who do not believe in all this. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Il giorno domenica 16 ottobre 2016 11:39:09 UTC+2, Rob ha scritto:
Non Newtonian Propulsion wrote: Il giorno giovedì 13 ottobre 2016 02:58:23 UTC+2, Sylvia Else ha scritto: On 12/10/2016 7:37 PM, Non Newtonian Propulsion wrote: For the fact that action reaction violation need the change of the first law of newtonian inertia and for the fact that is in contact with the terrestrial environment https://neolegesmotus.wordpress.com/...s-another-law/ It conveniently assumes that it's possible to change the charges on such a time-scale without the resulting magnetic fields totally negating the effect. A full analysis will show either that there's no net force, or that the change in momentum is matched by the momentum carried off as a result of a net radiation of electromagnetic waves in the opposite direction. Oh, and the fact that this thing will inevitably radiate electromagnetic waves means that it requires a constant input of power. Sylvia. If one assumes that the principle of action and reaction can be overcome in electrodynamics it must accept the consequences also on the law of inertia. And the change of the law of inertia is a great opportunity to shorten the time of interstellar travel E.Laureti Let's wait and see until they can provide an actually working lab demonstration of the principle. "we tried it with a microwave but we blew our microwave" does not sound like a very convincing attempt, to the contrary: it is what could have been expected by those who do not believe in all this. I say you only this: 1) It is right that everything passes first by a valid and convincing evidence of breach of the principle of action and reaction 2) When it is made public the pnn know-how everyone will be convinced by itself theoretically before than experimentally and anyone who has a lab of electrodynamics and wants the start of a new astronautica will try to redo experimentally what I'm doing since 2001 E.Laureti |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Non Newtonian Propulsion wrote:
Il giorno domenica 16 ottobre 2016 11:39:09 UTC+2, Rob ha scritto: Non Newtonian Propulsion wrote: Il giorno giovedì 13 ottobre 2016 02:58:23 UTC+2, Sylvia Else ha scritto: On 12/10/2016 7:37 PM, Non Newtonian Propulsion wrote: For the fact that action reaction violation need the change of the first law of newtonian inertia and for the fact that is in contact with the terrestrial environment https://neolegesmotus.wordpress.com/...s-another-law/ It conveniently assumes that it's possible to change the charges on such a time-scale without the resulting magnetic fields totally negating the effect. A full analysis will show either that there's no net force, or that the change in momentum is matched by the momentum carried off as a result of a net radiation of electromagnetic waves in the opposite direction. Oh, and the fact that this thing will inevitably radiate electromagnetic waves means that it requires a constant input of power. Sylvia. If one assumes that the principle of action and reaction can be overcome in electrodynamics it must accept the consequences also on the law of inertia. And the change of the law of inertia is a great opportunity to shorten the time of interstellar travel E.Laureti Let's wait and see until they can provide an actually working lab demonstration of the principle. "we tried it with a microwave but we blew our microwave" does not sound like a very convincing attempt, to the contrary: it is what could have been expected by those who do not believe in all this. I say you only this: 1) It is right that everything passes first by a valid and convincing evidence of breach of the principle of action and reaction 2) When it is made public the pnn know-how everyone will be convinced by itself theoretically before than experimentally and anyone who has a lab of electrodynamics and wants the start of a new astronautica will try to redo experimentally what I'm doing since 2001 E.Laureti I don't want to withhold you from doing experiments but I do not believe in those that have a controversial theory and see their experiments fail all the time, then blame it on "not enough resources" instead of an error in their theory. Futhermore, I think even when a relativistic effect could be exploited (like the conversion of energy to mass), it should always be taken into account that for a drive to be useful, it has to be generating enough force relative to the equipment mass and energy consumption to yield a noticable accelleration. When a 50kg experiment taking a kilowatt of power results in a force that is buried in the noise of supporting the weight of the equipment, it is not a useful drive system. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 16/10/2016 8:32 PM, Non Newtonian Propulsion wrote:
Il giorno giovedì 13 ottobre 2016 02:58:23 UTC+2, Sylvia Else ha scritto: On 12/10/2016 7:37 PM, Non Newtonian Propulsion wrote: For the fact that action reaction violation need the change of the first law of newtonian inertia and for the fact that is in contact with the terrestrial environment https://neolegesmotus.wordpress.com/...s-another-law/ It conveniently assumes that it's possible to change the charges on such a time-scale without the resulting magnetic fields totally negating the effect. A full analysis will show either that there's no net force, or that the change in momentum is matched by the momentum carried off as a result of a net radiation of electromagnetic waves in the opposite direction. Oh, and the fact that this thing will inevitably radiate electromagnetic waves means that it requires a constant input of power. Sylvia. If one assumes that the principle of action and reaction can be overcome in electrodynamics it must accept the consequences also on the law of inertia. And the change of the law of inertia is a great opportunity to shorten the time of interstellar travel E.Laureti I don't know why one would make such an assumption, given the lack of experimental evidence to support it. It should also be noted that any anisotropic radiator experiences a net force, completely in accordance with current theory. To be compelling, an experiment has to show a force in excess of that that would be produced by radiation for a given power input. Sylvia. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Il giorno lunedì 17 ottobre 2016 02:57:05 UTC+2, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 16/10/2016 8:32 PM, Non Newtonian Propulsion wrote: Il giorno giovedì 13 ottobre 2016 02:58:23 UTC+2, Sylvia Else ha scritto: On 12/10/2016 7:37 PM, Non Newtonian Propulsion wrote: For the fact that action reaction violation need the change of the first law of newtonian inertia and for the fact that is in contact with the terrestrial environment https://neolegesmotus.wordpress.com/...s-another-law/ It conveniently assumes that it's possible to change the charges on such a time-scale without the resulting magnetic fields totally negating the effect. A full analysis will show either that there's no net force, or that the change in momentum is matched by the momentum carried off as a result of a net radiation of electromagnetic waves in the opposite direction. Oh, and the fact that this thing will inevitably radiate electromagnetic waves means that it requires a constant input of power. Sylvia. If one assumes that the principle of action and reaction can be overcome in electrodynamics it must accept the consequences also on the law of inertia. And the change of the law of inertia is a great opportunity to shorten the time of interstellar travel E.Laureti I don't know why one would make such an assumption, given the lack of experimental evidence to support it. It should also be noted that any anisotropic radiator experiences a net force, completely in accordance with current theory. To be compelling, an experiment has to show a force in excess of that that would be produced by radiation for a given power input. Sylvia. The essence of the problem is that in the electrodynamic principle of action and reaction does not make sense to theoretical level. As it says W. Moretti in www.asps.it/azione.htm "Now in electrodynamics if the two bodies are charged, because of the delay effect you mention due to the mediation of the electromagnetic field, the third principle as I have set out above is not the case. The EM field can not 'be considered a body for various reasons (not even in the continuous theory mainly because 'does not define a field of speed' ...) for which the third principle can not 'even be formulated for the system charges + EM field. “ Unfortunately many physical books ignore this thing https://neolegesmotus.wordpress.com/...orbital-tests/ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17/10/2016 8:09 PM, Non Newtonian Propulsion wrote:
Il giorno lunedì 17 ottobre 2016 02:57:05 UTC+2, Sylvia Else ha scritto: On 16/10/2016 8:32 PM, Non Newtonian Propulsion wrote: Il giorno giovedì 13 ottobre 2016 02:58:23 UTC+2, Sylvia Else ha scritto: On 12/10/2016 7:37 PM, Non Newtonian Propulsion wrote: For the fact that action reaction violation need the change of the first law of newtonian inertia and for the fact that is in contact with the terrestrial environment https://neolegesmotus.wordpress.com/...s-another-law/ It conveniently assumes that it's possible to change the charges on such a time-scale without the resulting magnetic fields totally negating the effect. A full analysis will show either that there's no net force, or that the change in momentum is matched by the momentum carried off as a result of a net radiation of electromagnetic waves in the opposite direction. Oh, and the fact that this thing will inevitably radiate electromagnetic waves means that it requires a constant input of power. Sylvia. If one assumes that the principle of action and reaction can be overcome in electrodynamics it must accept the consequences also on the law of inertia. And the change of the law of inertia is a great opportunity to shorten the time of interstellar travel E.Laureti I don't know why one would make such an assumption, given the lack of experimental evidence to support it. It should also be noted that any anisotropic radiator experiences a net force, completely in accordance with current theory. To be compelling, an experiment has to show a force in excess of that that would be produced by radiation for a given power input. Sylvia. The essence of the problem is that in the electrodynamic principle of action and reaction does not make sense to theoretical level. As it says W. Moretti in www.asps.it/azione.htm "Now in electrodynamics if the two bodies are charged, because of the delay effect you mention due to the mediation of the electromagnetic field, the third principle as I have set out above is not the case. The EM field can not 'be considered a body for various reasons (not even in the continuous theory mainly because 'does not define a field of speed' ...) for which the third principle can not 'even be formulated for the system charges + EM field. “ This takes us back to the assumption that it's possible to charge the bodies without thereby having a current which creates a magnetic field. If you assume the impossible, then all bets are off. Sylvia. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/12/2016 4:37 AM, Non Newtonian Propulsion wrote:
For the fact that action reaction violation need the change of the first law of newtonian inertia and for the fact that is in contact with the terrestrial environment https://neolegesmotus.wordpress.com/...s-another-law/ https://www.reddit.com/r/EmDrive/com...of_the_law_of/ Utter non-sense. Learn some EM theory. There is no force "delay", the 'B' component acts on the EM field in its presence. As the field weakens so does the force. There is no delayed force propagating to the protons of 'A', If you tuned and tuned all day you could produce standing waves between the two, but that's about it. If this worked as described you could easily demonstrate the ability to make the elements of any dipole antenna wave around simply by tuning the transmitter. I offer proof that this is wrong by contradiction. Junk. As for EM Drive.... Before we resort to that let's wait for the experimental results to come back from those experiments soon to take place using Mu metals*. At the present time it's looking quite possible that this device is not much more that a *really* expensive electrically powered magnetic compass. In other words, the extremely weak forces generated may not be present in deep space w/o the Earth's geomagnetic field to help out. The only other theory currently extant is that this device is drawing (somehow) on quantum vacuum energy. Shawyer's conception of it deriving its propulsive force strictly via SR mechanics has been thoroughly debunked. Without the QVE theory it violates conservation of momentum. And with a thrust superior to that of a photon rocket it violates conservation of energy as well (i.e. it becomes a perpetual motion machine when used to drive a generator). I won't provide the cites, look them up yourself (Google). Dave *Although why no one has tried changing thrust directions using far easier to obtain or make Helmholtz coils is beyond me. Maybe I should ping the forums on that... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Moments of Inertia and the Shape of Continents and Landmasses on Earth | Nico V | Amateur Astronomy | 10 | July 3rd 12 07:31 PM |
Moments of Inertia and the Shape of Continents and Landmasses on Earth | Nico V | Misc | 5 | May 31st 12 02:07 PM |
Moments of Inertia and the Shape of Continents and Landmasses on Earth | Nico V | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 28th 12 07:56 PM |
Earth's Axis Slipping: Earth's Revolution Will Change: You Need To Find Another Planet To Live On | USS Andromeda | Misc | 1 | July 2nd 08 11:59 AM |
Spinning creates Inertia,and Inertia is Used by nature to BalanceGrav | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 1 | December 3rd 06 05:25 AM |