|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#121
|
|||
|
|||
LIFE ON VENUS EXISTS!!!
"Brad Guth" wrote:
I haven't had a boss for decades, doofus. You're 80+ years old? or just rich? or both? snicker Guth wracks his brain...and doesn't see the obvious. |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
LIFE ON VENUS EXISTS!!!
I know a serious pile of incest deposited crapolla when I see it. Thus
I'm not the one that's having to continually wipe off my shoes each and every time I go anywhere. What's your pathetic excuse for dropping all those piles of crapolla along the way? What's your best borg like collective swag for considering other life as having coexisted upon Venus? - Brad Guth |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
LIFE ON VENUS EXISTS!!!
Brad Guth wrote in
oups.com: How the hell did you get out of my KF? Oh, what the hell. Since I'm already reading this, I'll just go ahead and translate your post so everybody else can understand it: I know a serious pile of incest deposited crapolla when I see it. Mirror, mirror, on the wall... Thus I'm not the one that's having to continually wipe off my shoes each and every time I go anywhere. I don't have no shoes at all. What's your pathetic excuse for dropping all those piles of crapolla along the way? Do I suffer from schizophrenia? What's your best borg like collective swag for considering other life as having coexisted upon Venus? - Nope, just a bad case of apophenia. -- *** ERROR: OUT OF BEER *** |
#124
|
|||
|
|||
LIFE ON VENUS EXISTS!!!
Brad Guth wrote: I know a serious pile of incest deposited crapolla when I see it. Thus I'm not the one that's having to continually wipe off my shoes each and every time I go anywhere. What's your pathetic excuse for dropping all those piles of crapolla along the way? What's your best borg like collective swag for considering other life as having coexisted upon Venus? - Brad Guth Brad, you can't talk to the . . . BORG. They have a single mind, a single purpose, and that is to destroy all 'thinking' beings. They have no interest in science, technology, or art. They do not possess souls. They are machines with but one overriding desi the destruction of all sentient activity in the Universe. I told them about life on Mars. They attacked. I showed them pictures of Mars showing life on the planet. They attacked. I gave them directions to prove it for themselves by enlarging the JPL Photos. They attacked. They are machines with but one overriding desi the destruction of all sentient activity in the Universe. I explained technology to them. Informed them of NASA, and rockets, and satellites, and Probes. They attacked. I explicated the workings of the Space Shuttle, patiently explaining that it has flown more than 100 times and only had 2 catastrophic events -- and that isn't bad for a Spaceship. They attacked. I designed a waverider spaceplane with wondrous SSME engines and a slick basalt/epoxy hull. They attacked. They are machines with but one overriding desi the destruction of all sentient activity in the Universe. So, Brad, don't waste your time with them; or they will attack! They are machines with but one overriding desi the destruction of all sentient activity in the Universe. tomcat |
#125
|
|||
|
|||
LIFE ON VENUS EXISTS!!!
tomcat wrote:
Brad Guth wrote: I know a serious pile of incest deposited crapolla when I see it. Thus I'm not the one that's having to continually wipe off my shoes each and every time I go anywhere. What's your pathetic excuse for dropping all those piles of crapolla along the way? What's your best borg like collective swag for considering other life as having coexisted upon Venus? - Brad Guth Brad, you can't talk to the . . . BORG. They have a single mind, a single purpose, and that is to destroy all 'thinking' beings. They have no interest in science, technology, or art. You mean the Brad who posts thusly? "incest deposited crapolla" "continually wipe off my shoes" "dropping all those piles of crapolla" They do not possess souls. They are machines with but one overriding desi the destruction of all sentient activity in the Universe. OK, I'm convinced now -- you're an idiot. I told them about life on Mars. No, you didn't. They attacked. No, your errors were exposed. I showed them pictures of Mars showing life on the planet. No, you didn't. They attacked. No, your errors were exposed. I gave them directions to prove it for themselves by enlarging the JPL Photos. If this fantasy of yours is real, it is your job to provide the evidence, no one else's. Yet you are unable to comprehend this simple concept. They attacked. No, your errors were exposed. They are machines with but one overriding desi the destruction of all sentient activity in the Universe. More idiocy. I explained technology to them. You mean "zero point energy"? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA Informed them of NASA, and rockets, and satellites, and Probes. Are you really this dense? They attacked. No, you were laughed at. I explicated the workings of the Space Shuttle, patiently explaining that it has flown more than 100 times and only had 2 catastrophic events -- and that isn't bad for a Spaceship. They attacked. I designed a waverider spaceplane with wondrous SSME engines and a slick basalt/epoxy hull. They attacked. They are machines with but one overriding desi the destruction of all sentient activity in the Universe. See above. So, Brad, don't waste your time with them; or they will attack! They are machines with but one overriding desi the destruction of all sentient activity in the Universe. Froth on, please, oh clueless one. tomcat -- Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy Official Agent of Deception Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005 "An applied ripple action implies time and momentum reciprocal dependent directed surface tension not instantaneous field wide reaction." -- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief |
#126
|
|||
|
|||
LIFE ON VENUS EXISTS!!!
"Brad Guth" wrote:
I know a serious pile of incest deposited crapolla when I see it. Thus I'm not the one that's having to continually wipe off my shoes each and every time I go anywhere. Guph, your act is pitiful enough without resorting to blatant lies. Stick to the usual crazy ****. What's your pathetic excuse for dropping all those piles of crapolla along the way? What's your best borg like collective swag for considering other life as having coexisted upon Venus? I can't help you with that kind of guess, but I can give you an Earthling's conjecture. I say that the absence of even one minim of evidence or argument suggesting life on Venus is the one and only clue. It might be a bit over the top to say that it's impossible, but it's for sure 100% dumb to take the 100% lack of evidence as proof of Venusians. Sheeee-IT, boy, you don't even have any blurry pictures of rocks to show us! |
#127
|
|||
|
|||
LIFE ON VENUS EXISTS!!!
"tomcat" wrote:
Brad Guth wrote: I know a serious pile of incest deposited crapolla when I see it. Thus I'm not the one that's having to continually wipe off my shoes each and every time I go anywhere. What's your pathetic excuse for dropping all those piles of crapolla along the way? What's your best borg like collective swag for considering other life as having coexisted upon Venus? - Brad Guth Brad, you can't talk to the . . . BORG. They have a single mind, a single purpose, and that is to destroy all 'thinking' beings. They have no interest in science, technology, or art. They do not possess souls. They are machines with but one overriding desi the destruction of all sentient activity in the Universe. I told them about life on Mars. They attacked. I showed them pictures of Mars showing life on the planet. They attacked. I gave them directions to prove it for themselves by enlarging the JPL Photos. They attacked. They are machines with but one overriding desi the destruction of all sentient activity in the Universe. I explained technology to them. Informed them of NASA, and rockets, and satellites, and Probes. They attacked. I explicated the workings of the Space Shuttle, patiently explaining that it has flown more than 100 times and only had 2 catastrophic events -- and that isn't bad for a Spaceship. They attacked. I designed a waverider spaceplane with wondrous SSME engines and a slick basalt/epoxy hull. They attacked. They are machines with but one overriding desi the destruction of all sentient activity in the Universe. So, Brad, don't waste your time with them; or they will attack! They are machines with but one overriding desi the destruction of all sentient activity in the Universe. You've come to a good point (again) to end that schtick. Show up here tomorrow with a new one and a new anonym if you must continue. |
#128
|
|||
|
|||
LIFE ON VENUS EXISTS!!!
Brad, you can't talk to the . . . BORG.
tomcat, I know, I know. That's why I have to utilize my lose cannons in order to return the favor. I told them about life on Mars. They attacked. I showed them pictures of Mars showing life on the planet. They attacked. I gave them directions to prove it for themselves by enlarging the JPL Photos. They attacked. They are machines with but one overriding desi the destruction of all sentient activity in the Universe. I explained technology to them. Informed them of NASA, and rockets, and satellites, and Probes. They attacked. I explicated the workings of the Space Shuttle, patiently explaining that it has flown more than 100 times and only had 2 catastrophic events -- and that isn't bad for a Spaceship. They attacked. I designed a waverider spaceplane with wondrous SSME engines and a slick basalt/epoxy hull. They attacked. They are machines with but one overriding desi the destruction of all sentient activity in the Universe. Observationology simply isn't allowed, any more so than deductive reasoning or the regular laws of physics. Of anything hard-science has to have their pagan NASA stamp of approval, and of anything PhotoShop is entirely taboo. In fact, seeing whatever is not believing. Since I do not have sufficient hard-science as to other life existing/coexisting or not upon on Mars, as such all that I can manage is advise the likes of ourselves to find better groups and/or to further nail down the obvious with greater information, such as to what the sub-frozen, easily pulverised and generally TBI to death planet of Mars has to offer, such as in the way of sharing whatever's a whole lot tougher and of rad-hard DNA than Earth life. The same arguments and/or topic demands certainly goes for other life as having been existing/coexisting upon Venus. They are machines with but one overriding desi the destruction of all sentient activity in the Universe. Where's all of those spare WMD when you need them? - Brad Guth |
#129
|
|||
|
|||
LIFE ON VENUS EXISTS!!!
Hey guys,
ESA's probe was just inserted into VENUSian orbit with success and has already begun to transmit images. Images of VENUSian life have already been posted on the web at http://www.playboy.com. So not much point in speculating anymore. |
#130
|
|||
|
|||
LIFE ON VENUS EXISTS!!!
Name them, conspiracyboi. Provide evidence that your delusional
conspiracy exists, if you can pry your slurper away from the ko0k who has to deny physical evidence because it conflicts with his religious beliefs. Bookman, I've already been there and done that. The laws of physics proves that just about anything you'd care to argue that's related to those supposed EVAs is so easily included in their being phony baloney, as in bogus and otherwise nothing but LLPOF infomercial-science worthy. Better images as obtained from Earth and of many others from satellite (I'm including those of the official NASA/Apollo archives) are further proof that we've not accomplished what we've been told. Not to mention that there's still no freaking proof-tested R&D of any fly-by-rocket lander available for the next round of efforts, and of no documentation as to whatever supposedly existed before. Accomplishing LL-1 is very doable and extremely important (even that's better off than anything the USSR or Russia of today has accomplished via manned mission), whereas going in for orbiting that nasty sucker is about as damn risky, obviously spendy but otherwise technically doable as it gets. Even low orbits of anything below 50 km has been downright impossible to sustain without involving a great deal of reaction thrusting and of having a set of powerful reaction wheels to boot. The closer to the moon the more mascon affected things get (it's almost as though our salty moon is semi-hollow and the shell is that of representing a rather extremely uneven density). Obviously tens of meters of fluffy moon dust, and/or that of large salt deposits isn't offering very good density as compared to the concentrations of iron, basalts and of the typically greater densities of whatever contributed via impacting our once-upon-a-time icy proto-moon that's likely accommodating massive geode pockets offering little more than brine if not having crystallized into being hollow cavern like environments. Fantasy world he lives in? What, that the government lies about everything, and NASA is part of the government, that is lying, and he has seen through it? - Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead. Here I'd thought that I was simply polishing upon what already existed. - Brad Guth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | SETI | 8 | May 26th 04 04:45 PM |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Policy | 0 | May 21st 04 08:00 AM |
Space Calendar - February 27, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 1 | February 27th 04 08:18 PM |
Space Calendar - January 27, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 7 | January 29th 04 10:29 PM |
Space Calendar - September 28, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | September 28th 03 08:00 AM |