|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe you sci.astro.amateur and sci.astro readers can explain this
"Common Man" wrote in message news.com... Note to the readers of sci.astro.amateur and sci.astro: Pearl is a regular in the alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian newsgroup and claims that the earth could be hollow. She goes on to claim that this could have been caused by a rapidly spinning early earth. I've tried to explain (without success) that such a rapidly spinning body would flatten out rather than become hollow. If any of you wish to take a crack at explaining this to her, feel free. For Pearl: Evidence that a rapidly spinning object would flatten out, not become hollow. See: http://www.govertschilling.nl/artike.../030612_sc.htm Hmmm, we might be orbiting a tad differently if our mass were significantly different than we have guessed it to be as a semi-solid core. Talk about global warming. Tom |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe you sci.astro.amateur and sci.astro readers can explain this
Tom Hole wrote:
Hmmm, we might be orbiting a tad differently if our mass were significantly different than we have guessed it to be as a semi-solid core. Talk about global warming. Heh. But the mass is known from Newton's laws (from the Moon's distance and orbital period), not from estimates based on the Earth's composition. That composition is understood from observations of wave propagation through the Earth's innards, and you're quite right that if the Earth were hollowed out in any way (including like a donut), those waves would propagate quite differently than they do in fact. Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe you sci.astro.amateur and sci.astro readers can explain this
Tom Hole wrote:
Hmmm, we might be orbiting a tad differently if our mass were significantly different than we have guessed it to be as a semi-solid core. Talk about global warming. Heh. But the mass is known from Newton's laws (from the Moon's distance and orbital period), not from estimates based on the Earth's composition. That composition is understood from observations of wave propagation through the Earth's innards, and you're quite right that if the Earth were hollowed out in any way (including like a donut), those waves would propagate quite differently than they do in fact. Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Maybe you sci.astro.amateur and sci.astro readers can explain this | Sam Wormley | Astronomy Misc | 16 | July 2nd 04 10:17 PM |
Maybe you sci.astro.amateur and sci.astro readers can explain this | Davoud | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | July 2nd 04 04:35 AM |