If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. 


Thread Tools  Display Modes 
#1




comparing how General Relativity works versus how EMgravity worksChapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1470 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
In the past few days I have made numerous mistakes, but this material
is exceedingly complicated and complex. We can sense the complications because we had an entire century of astronomy where astronomers and physicists alike knew the Sun moved in Space at 220km/sec whilst Earth is 29km/sec and Jupiter is mere 13km/sec. Those speeds alone tell a rational person that Newtonian gravity and General Relativity are fake theories for they cannot lock planets into their orbits when the Sun is moving faster than the planets themselves. Newtonian gravity was built under the premiss that the Sun had 0 motion in Space. When General Relativity came along, it was to solve the precession of Mercury, but they ignored the greatest problem of all, how to reconcile that Jupiter moves in Space at 13km/sec and the Sun at 220km/sec. Gravity is complicated and complex and so when problems arise, it is easier to ignore and dismiss them rather than admit the problem and look for a solution. The solution to the Sun's 220 and Earth's 29 involves replacing gravity with the EM forces of physics which are 10^40 stronger than Newtonian gravity or General Relativity. We picture each planet with a mass and the mass is proportional to how many magnetic monopoles compose that mass. And magnetic monopoles are always attractive where north attracts south and north attracts north, never any repulsion. Since the Sun has the most magnetic monopoles, then the Space around the Sun is the most bent or curved space. Now imagine a planet Y similar to Jupiter travelling in space at 233km/ sec in a straight line in Euclidean 3rd dimension and the Sun at 220km/ sec and the Y comes up and meets the Sun at a distance of 5.2 AU alongside the Sun. Since the Sun is so much more massive, it bends the space around Y so that Y would be locked to the Sun in an orbit which would look like 13km/sec only it is really 233km/sec. So General Relativity says that space is not Euclidean but rather is a bent Space like the surface of a sphere, what can be called a gravity cell. But GR assumes the Sun is going at 0 km/sec in Space and then it can say that Jupiter is going at 13km/sec and gravitationally locked to the Sun. But that is wrong, since we do know that the Sun is moving 220km/sec and Jupiter is not moving at 233km/sec but merely 13km/sec. So what is the solution? The solution is that gravity is EMgravity and the Sun sets up a gravitycell, of Faraday lines of force. Space is not Euclidean but rather it is the surface of a sphere and so as Jupiter pulls up to the Sun at 13km/sec it is gravitationally locked to the Sun if this gravitycell spins on an axis at a good pace of spin. So the solution involves the Sun moving at 220km/sec and Jupiter moving at 13km/sec but that the Solar ecliptic is spinning around a gigantic axis of the Solar gravity cell. The best I can make of that rate of spin is 110 days for one circuit. I arrive at 110 due to Mercury is 47km/sec and so 47/220 is about 1/5, so that Mercury's contribution to the 88 day revolution is a 1/5 contribution and the other 4/5 is the contribution of the Solar gravity cell spin. Unless I am mistaken again 5/4 x 88 days is 110 days that the Solar gravity cell makes one complete turn. Now I do not know if this Solar Gravity Cell is solid body rotation throughout the Solar System, or whether each planet as its own gravity cell attached to the Solar gravity cell. It really gets complex here. If it is solid body rotation, then the further the distance from the Sun such as Jupiter is 5.2AU whereas Mercury is 0.4AU, the speed of Jupiter has to be far smaller than that of Mercury because the solid body rotation lifts Jupiter around the Sun. So basically, General Relativity had the Space around the Sun the same as what I am having the Space around the Sun. The only big difference is that I have the Sun moving at 220km/sec whereas GR has the Sun motionless. I solve the problem by making gravity a EM force and having a spinning gravity cell. In GR, they have a gravity cell, but it is not spinning.  An author archive search for AP reveals massive vandalism starting May â€¨2012 where only one or two posts per month survive, whereas another poster David Bernier, all his posts continue to be author archived. A Google search of just Archimedes Plutonium reveals massive search enginebombing, and likely the reason for wanting to destroy the authorarchive of AP. If we listen to the fool Jeff Relf: Google Groups is 100% uncensored, so it isn't fully indexed. Were Google Groups fully indexed, it'd be used to game the system; We would think all posters have most of their posts missing in the author archive, but apparently only AP is targeted for massive deletions of his author archive posts. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair author archiving of AP posts for the past several years as seen he http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986 Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electrondotcloud are galaxies 
Ads 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
TitiusBode Rule becomes a law of physics from Maxwell EquationsChapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1456 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed  Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]  Astronomy Misc  7  April 4th 13 09:54 AM 
Table of Resonances Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1455 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed  Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]  Astronomy Misc  1  April 3rd 13 08:10 PM 
explaining the cause of Uranus 97 degree axial tilt; Ida & DactylChapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1453 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed  Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]  Astronomy Misc  2  April 3rd 13 12:50 AM 
Gravity cells to patch up the Sun's 220km/sec Chapt16.14 mathematicsof the force of gravity #1446 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed  Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]  Astronomy Misc  1  March 31st 13 08:19 AM 
Gravity = massgravity + positronspacegravity; superfluid heliumbehaviour #368 Atom Totality 4th ed  Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]  Astronomy Misc  0  March 12th 11 09:08 AM 