#1
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: Arp 95
Arp 95 is a triple galaxy system located in Bootes about 425 million
light-years from us. Arp put these three under Galaxies with companions on arms: Elliptical galaxy companions. By this the lower one to the right isn't included. The lower galaxy is not classed at NED. It appears to be a Magellanic type dwarf to me. Possibly a spiral or irregular. Certainly not elliptical as it would need to be to fit the category. There is no redshift distance for it either so can't say for certain it is even a member of the group. The elliptical has the same redshift as the big spiral so certainly is a member of the group. The only hint of distortion is that there appears to be a weak tidal plume off the northwestern arm of the spiral, opposite the elliptical. Was it caused by either of the apparent companions? I found nothing to help answer this. Arp's comment reads: "Star-like condensation in spiral. Connection to E galaxy inferred, not seen." The "star-like condensation" turns out to be just that, a foreground star. At least the SDSS lists it as a star and it appears to be a star in the Sloan image. While enlarged by seeing in my image it shows the typical PSF (point spread function) of a star rather than a star cloud or galaxy so I agree with the Sloan image. The spiral is classed at NED as SBb and is listed as a starburst galaxy indicating a lot of hidden star formation is going on at its core. While this can be triggered by interaction that's now known to not be necessary. So was it triggered by interaction with one of the companions? If so I'd vote, not for the elliptical but for the distorted Magellanic spiral below it. It, at least, looks messed up though again that could be misleading. You'll notice I've avoided putting any identification on the three galaxies, just using their descriptions. This is because there is some confusion here. NED claims the little Magellanic galaxy to the south is IC 4461 and the big spiral is IC 4462 with the elliptical being MGC +5-34-78. Most other sources say the spiral is IC 4461 and the elliptical IC 4462 with the Magellanic like galaxy to the south being MGC +05-34-76. Actually all sources agree to the two MGC identities. Its the IC ones that they disagree on. SIMBAD is really confusing. If you go by their data base by entering the name it agrees with most other sources saying the Elliptical is IC 4462 and spiral IC 4461 but if you use SIMBAD to provide coordinates for the POSS plates at http://stdatu.stsci.edu/cgi-bin/dss_form/ then it agrees to NED not its own database! Confused? NED lists the small southern galaxy as being only 0.1 magnitudes dimmer than the big spiral. This can't be right. It goes on to list the elliptical as 0.7 magnitudes fainter than the spiral. Again, this can't be right. Also the IC catalog is basically a visual catalog. That is the entries were found initially by visual observers. Wouldn't it be natural the bigger and brighter ones would be seen not the biggest and brightest then the smallest and dimmest omitting the elliptical? Thus I feel NED is the one that is screwed up here. I can't figure out what is going on with SIMBAD other than a split personality. Webb and Kanipe identify the galaxies with the majority, that is the two northern galaxies being the IC entries. Dennis Webb has told me such mix-ups were common. Determining who was right was often impossible but trying to be as accurate as possible delayed the book by a year or more. There is little on the rest of the field. The galaxy to the left in the enlarged, cropped image is MAPS-NGP O_326_3139474. This plate measurement catalog is the only entry in NED for this rather major galaxy compared to most of the field. NED shows no entry for it in the SDSS or any other catalog. Though the SDSS does list the star to its northwest. Having nothing more than what the automated plate measurement comes up with there is no distance estimate for it or any other galaxy in the field. This is really a dead zone as far as information goes. When taking this, one red frame was lost to clouds so I retook it after the clouds cleared and the other color frames were shot. Or I tried to. Somehow I told the software to take a blue frame rather than red and didn't catch it until now. So this one has one red, two green and 3 blue frames thanks to my error. This did make getting decent red in the image difficult and likely explains why the elliptical is more white than yellow orange of a typical elliptical. Though on the SDSS image it is a much paler color than usual for ellipticals using their 7 color scheme that includes three near infrared channels that turns most ellipticals far redder than they really are. So my color may not be as red deficient as it appears. Another for the retake list however. There is no annotated image since only the two northern galaxies have red shift data already mentioned above. Arp's image is at: http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/A...big_arp95.jpeg 14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' (one dimmed by clouds) R=1x10'x3 G=2x10'x3 B=3x10'x3, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME Rick -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 12th 07 01:05 AM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | SETI | 0 | October 6th 05 02:34 AM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 6th 05 02:34 AM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 30th 04 02:23 AM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | SETI | 0 | September 30th 04 02:23 AM |