A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Definitions Astro "Messier Objects"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 7th 04, 05:44 PM
Mark F.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Definitions Astro "Messier Objects"

Ok I looked in two dictionary and could not find "Messier Objects".

Would one of you kind astronomers give a layman's definition to me.

Thanks in advance Mark F.

--
Hike High Mountain
Fish for Wild Trout


  #2  
Old March 7th 04, 06:06 PM
Rod Mollise
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Definitions Astro "Messier Objects"

Ok I looked in two dictionary and could not find "Messier Objects".

Would one of you kind astronomers give a layman's definition to me.


Hi:

The Messier Objects are those deep sky objects (nebulae, galaxies, star
clusters) discovered or at least catalogued by Charles Messier (1730-1817). The
original "purpose" of Messier's list, which, depending on who you listen to,
contains between about 100 and 110 objects, was to aid comet hunters. Messier,
a comet hunter himself, wanted to list fuzzy objects that could be mistaken for
comets by those seeking them. Since many of the DSOs Messier put in his
catalogue could not have been mistaken for comets, even with the telescopes of
his age, it seems that he went beyond his original idea to make the list of
"interesting" objects we still enjoy today.


Peace,
Rod Mollise
Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_
Like SCTs and MCTs?
Check-out sct-user, the mailing list for CAT fanciers!
Goto http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html
  #4  
Old March 8th 04, 12:55 AM
Brian Tung
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Definitions Astro "Messier Objects"

Nick Theodorakis wrote:
It looks like he was "padding" his list in the M30's to M40's -- lots
of open clusters there.


I have heard that the last four items or so (Orion Nebula, Beehive, and
Pleiades) *are* padding, but the previous ones are not. After all, just
because something is an open cluster does not mean that it doesn't appear
nebulous to a clearly suboptimal telescope. Consider M37 or M67.

For some reason, people seem to think that he wanted 45 items for his
list. I'm not sure why 45 is such a wonderful number--seems to me, I'd
have just picked out another 5 (NGC 869/884, for instance) to pad it up
to 50.

Brian Tung
The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/
Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/
The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/
My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt
  #5  
Old March 8th 04, 04:02 AM
Bill Ferris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Definitions Astro "Messier Objects"

Nick Theodorakis wrote:
[snip]
How did M45 (or even M44) get on the list?

It looks like he was "padding" his list in the M30's to M40's
-- lots of open clusters there.


I don't think you can make a case for so many objects being "padding." However,
I do believe Messier added M42 through M45 to fill out his first catalog.

Charles Messier encountered the Crab nebula in 1758 while observing a comet. It
wasn't until 1760, two years after this observation, that Messier observed the
globular cluster that would become M2. 1760 was also the year Messier
discovered his first comet.

Over the next decade, Messier established himself as the greatest comet hunter
in Europe. His election to the Royal Society of London in 1764, and to the
Berlin Academy and the Academy of St. Petersburg in 1766 all occurred after
comet discoveries.

However, the most respected scientific body in Europe, the French Academy of
Sciences, would not have their countryman. The Academy first passed on Messier
in 1764 after his third comet discovery. I suspect it's no coincidence that
Messier began cataloging non-cometary objects with great enthusiasm in 1764.
Objects 3 through 40 were observed and noted by the Frenchman that year, alone.
He added M41 the following year but nothing more until 1769.

The night of March 4, 1769, Messier determined positions for objects 42 through
45. These were the Orion nebula, the reflection nebula just to the north of
M42, the Beehive cluster in Cancer and the Pleiades in Taurus. Three of the
four were quite well known and visible to the unaided eye. They were also the
last objects in the first Messier catalog. On August 8, 1769, Messier
discovered his fifth comet.

The years 1770 and 1771 brought three more comets. In January 1771, Messier
independently discovered the Great Comet of 1770 (1770 II). The following
month, he presented his catalog to the French Academy on the ocassion of his
election to that august body.

Viewed in this context, I believe Messier was an early case of publish or
perish syndrome. Why did he wait so many years before adding objects 42 through
45 to his catalog? The most plausible explanation is that all were well known
objects and very unlikely to be mistaken as comets. However, believing that the
French Academy was steadfast in their reluctance to elect him, Messier added
these objects to fill out the catalog he hoped would tip the scales in his
favor.

Regards,



Bill Ferris
"Cosmic Voyage: The Online Resource for Amateur Astronomers"
URL: http://www.cosmic-voyage.net
=============
Email: Remove "ic" from .comic above to respond

  #6  
Old March 7th 04, 06:54 PM
John Damico
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Definitions Astro "Messier Objects"

http://www.synapticsystems.com/sky/messier.html


  #7  
Old March 7th 04, 06:56 PM
John Damico
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Definitions Astro "Messier Objects"

The SEDS site listed as a link at the bottom of the page is a good one too,
unfortunately it appears their site has been hit by hackers, check it out
when they resolve their problem...


  #8  
Old March 7th 04, 06:33 PM
Ed
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Definitions Astro "Messier Objects"


Ok I looked in two dictionary and could not find "Messier Objects".



Tney are not worth finding. Say no to Messier.



  #9  
Old March 7th 04, 07:40 PM
Wfoley2
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Definitions Astro "Messier Objects"

They are the object that are not neater. g
Actually, they are mostly the objects cataloged by the French Comet-Seeker
Messier to list stationary objects which might, under some conditions, resemble
a comet. These include almost every type of deep-sky object, as well as some
products of "averted imagination".
Clear, Dark, Steady Skies!
(And considerate neighbors!!!)


  #10  
Old March 7th 04, 07:56 PM
Davoud
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Definitions Astro "Messier Objects"

Mark F.:
Ok I looked in two dictionary and could not find "Messier Objects".
Would one of you kind astronomers give a layman's definition to me.
Thanks in advance Mark F.


There is a nice description at
http://www.synapticsystems.com/sky/messier.html. The page also
includes a list of the Messier Objects and a link to a biography of
Charles Messier.

Davoud

--
usenet *at* davidillig dawt com
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sedna, space probes?, colonies? what's next? TKalbfus Policy 265 July 13th 04 12:00 AM
Sedna (2003 VB12) Ron Astronomy Misc 1 March 19th 04 12:44 PM
Messier Marathon Weekend 2004 - March 20-21, 2004 EFLASPO Amateur Astronomy 13 February 28th 04 02:59 AM
NASA Releases Near-Earth Object Search Report Ron Baalke Astronomy Misc 0 September 10th 03 04:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.