Science and art are indistinguishable, right, hanson?

--
Please see this quite short video:

http://archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Cyberia...ies/Smarr2.mov

"Science and art are indistinguishable."

http://www.paletaworld.org/dbimages/3263_1.jpg

============================================

On Sep 6, 4:33*pm, "Androcles" wrote:
--
Please see this quite short video:

* *http://archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Cyberia...ies/Smarr2.mov

* * * * * *"Science and art are indistinguishable."

*http://www.paletaworld.org/dbimages/3263_1.jpg

============================================

Come on Andro!
Modern Science and art ARE indistinguishable!
Art never relies on an "explanation" or "cross-checking" with reality
by experiment. It exists on it's own for what it is and must be
accepted on those terms. Sure people try to "explain" art but they
mostly fail. Who can explain art? Who can "explain" the beauty of pure
mathematical expression? Each piece stands on it's own merits without
any outside support. And such it is with modern physics. Mathematics
is now the TRUE reality. There is no reality that exists outside of
mathematical artistry. We have proved that beyond doubt in a recent
thread right here in this group.

Thus, it is mathematical ability and beauty that are the crowning
measure of science achievement today and of course, the beauty of the
mathematics of Einstein is the ultimate orgasm of the creative
universe! Thus, there now only remains one final question: Who here
among us is to be the person to prove that he or she is to be the one
"smarter than Einstein"?

http://www.paletaworld.org/dbimages/3263_1.jpg

On Sep 6, 11:21*pm, Benj wrote in sci.physics:
On Sep 6, 4:33*pm, "Androcles" wrote:

--
Please see this quite short video:

* *http://archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Cyberia...ies/Smarr2.mov

* * * * * *"Science and art are indistinguishable."

*http://www.paletaworld.org/dbimages/3263_1.jpg

============================================

Come on Andro!
Modern Science and art ARE indistinguishable!
Art never relies on an "explanation" or "cross-checking" with reality
by experiment. It exists on it's own for what it is and must be
accepted on those terms. Sure people try to "explain" art but they
mostly fail. Who can explain art? Who can "explain" the beauty of pure
mathematical expression? *Each piece stands on it's own merits without
any outside support. And such it is with modern physics. *Mathematics
is now the TRUE reality. There is no reality that exists outside of
mathematical artistry. We have proved that beyond doubt in a recent
thread right here in this group.

Thus, it is mathematical ability and beauty that are the crowning
measure of science achievement today and of course, the beauty of the
mathematics of Einstein is the ultimate orgasm of the creative
universe! *Thus, there now only remains one final question: Who here
among us is to be the person to prove that he or she is to be the one
"smarter than Einstein"?

http://www.paletaworld.org/dbimages/3263_1.jpg

Yet Einsteinians do know the true name of Einstein's "beauty":

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main...11/bosmo10.xml
"Einstein may have started the ROT. When experiment dominated physics,
his work was driven by aesthetic concerns. He sought beauty (notably
symmetry) in mathematical haiku that capture something complex,
transcendental and profound."

Pentcho Valev