A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » FITS
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

[fitsbits] Hour angle / Declination



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 19th 04, 09:52 AM
Jennifer Hatchell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default [fitsbits] Hour angle / Declination

Is there a standard CTYPE notation for hour angle and declination?

Best wishes,
Jenny
--
Dr. Jennifer Hatchell
tel: +49 (0)228 525 273 Max-Planck-Institut fuer Radioastronomie
fax: +49 (0)228 525 229 Auf dem Huegel 69, 53121 Bonn, GERMANY

  #2  
Old July 19th 04, 03:35 PM
Steve Allen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default [fitsbits] Hour angle / Declination

On Mon 2004-07-19T10:52:45 +0200, Jennifer Hatchell hath writ:

Is there a standard CTYPE notation for hour angle and declination?


No.

If there were it would have to disambiguate numerous issues.

Would it be the values as reported by a telescope pointing system?
If so, would those be raw encoder values or re-reduced and registered ones?

Would it include the effects of refraction?

Would it include the effects of diurnal aberration?

How would it specify the implied coordinates of the observer?
Geocentric? Astronomical? Geodetic?

Would its values be calculated using the old Newcomb expressions
which became invalid in 1984?
The Aoki et al. expressions which became invalid in 2003?
The new CEO/TEO expressions which imply a whole new nomenclature?

On the other hand, there is nothing preventing the informal use of
local conventions for those keyword values.

--
Steve Allen UCO/Lick Observatory Santa Cruz, CA 95064
Voice: +1 831 459 3046 http://www.ucolick.org/~sla
PGP: 1024/E46978C5 F6 78 D1 10 62 94 8F 2E 49 89 0E FE 26 B4 14 93

  #3  
Old July 19th 04, 03:35 PM
Steve Allen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default [fitsbits] Hour angle / Declination

On Mon 2004-07-19T10:52:45 +0200, Jennifer Hatchell hath writ:

Is there a standard CTYPE notation for hour angle and declination?


No.

If there were it would have to disambiguate numerous issues.

Would it be the values as reported by a telescope pointing system?
If so, would those be raw encoder values or re-reduced and registered ones?

Would it include the effects of refraction?

Would it include the effects of diurnal aberration?

How would it specify the implied coordinates of the observer?
Geocentric? Astronomical? Geodetic?

Would its values be calculated using the old Newcomb expressions
which became invalid in 1984?
The Aoki et al. expressions which became invalid in 2003?
The new CEO/TEO expressions which imply a whole new nomenclature?

On the other hand, there is nothing preventing the informal use of
local conventions for those keyword values.

--
Steve Allen UCO/Lick Observatory Santa Cruz, CA 95064
Voice: +1 831 459 3046 http://www.ucolick.org/~sla
PGP: 1024/E46978C5 F6 78 D1 10 62 94 8F 2E 49 89 0E FE 26 B4 14 93

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Earth rotation don findlay Astronomy Misc 122 July 9th 04 07:57 PM
Pioneer 10 anomaly: Galileo, Ulysses? James Harris Astronomy Misc 58 January 28th 04 11:15 PM
Thanks George Oriel36 Astronomy Misc 31 January 5th 04 02:16 PM
UFO Activities from Biblical Times Kazmer Ujvarosy Astronomy Misc 0 December 25th 03 05:21 AM
principle of planetary rotation Marshall Dudley Astronomy Misc 121 August 5th 03 09:10 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.