Flight 77 debris was American Airlines Flight 965

On Tuesday, October 8, 2013 10:54:27 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
BDK wrote:

In article , lid says...



BDK wrote:

In article , lid

says...



BDK wrote:

In article , lid

says...



BDK wrote:

In article , lid

says...



Rocky wrote:

"Bast" wrote in message

...





Rocky wrote:

I always thought it was strange that the rest of the alleged

Flight 77 burned up inside the Pentagon with the exception of

one small part. Well, after watching the following video we

will all know the trick behind that one small part. See:



Flight 77 debris was American Airlines Flight 965

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFBFGSimy_c



And again we are left with supporting evidence that neither

Flight 11 or Flight 77 took off on 9/11/01.



WTC-1 and 2 Sequence RDX and Thermate Detonations Implemented

by CDI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAVzQHrcPNo



As far as hijackers are concerned we need look no further than

The 911 Commission to see evidence that the Commission itself

was hijacked.



Rocky









And ask why Bush didn't even think a 9/11 investigation was

warranted,....until he was pressured into it.

...Then both Bush and Cheny REFUSED to give testimony under

oath.



9/11 was an inside job.



On 9/11/01 itself I became very suspicious about things.



I was in the LA area during the First Interstate Bank fire and

it kept standing after the fire in LA so I knew something was up

after seeing the Twin Towers collapse and collapse without

giving any fight.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_I...ate_Tower_fire



I used to watch every jet I could and I'd been around plenty of

large airports too but the bottom of the alleged Flight 175 was

strange to say the least. Plus, I used to play Flight

Simulator a lot and I never managed to fly between the two

towers at speed so I don't know how anybody could hit one

particular tower at will. It is easy to land with a long flat

runway but the towers were straight up and down so it was not

easy to tell if you were going to the left or going to right of

them.

The Pentagon was a complete joke. I mean they were trying to

tell us it was rammed by a passenger jet with no evidence

whatsoever of that.



I'd heard Flight 93 had landed safely then the story changes and

it had crash landed instead. And then nothing was found where

it was supposed to have crashed in what I now call Shamsville.



Then after seeing WTC 7 fall straight down as fast as a rock it

was obvious we were not told the truth about things.



Then all the crap with the 9/11 commission just like you stated

made it very obvious our government is the best that money can

buy.



While I originally believed that something rammed the South

Tower even though it was not the real Flight 175 now I have my

doubts that any jets crashed on 9/11/01 and will have to wait

to find out exactly how the alleged Flight 175 was pulled off.



Rocky













Well, back in 1993,....we knew this technology was available.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9R787ZlSE0



Back then the Pentagon and al-CIA-qida, was bragging they could

target not only a building, but a specific window in a building



And I'll bet without any notice, most people would think THIS was

plane. if it suddnely flew over them.

http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question...f/tomahawk.jpg



It's a Tomahawk Crusie missle from 1993.

....Now imagine how much they improved the technology by 2001



And it's a lot more believable that a cruise missle would punch

a 16 foot round hole in the pentagon, than a 100+ foot wide 40

foot tall passenger jet.

Not even factoring in the ground effect would not even allow a

passenger jet to fly 5 feet off the ground at 500 MPH for the

better part of a 1/2 mile.



And that is even without thinking about WTC 7 coming down with

nothing hitting it at all.



So much stupidity is so few words. Only a troofer could do that...













And as usual, you have no credible evidence to prove otherwise.

Only childish insults.



Or perhaps you can show us photos of ANY other airline crashes,

where whole passenger jet aircraft vaporized on impact ?



No sane person claims any aircraft "vaporized" on 911. There were

all kinds of parts and debris found. Only troofer kOOks claim

otherwise.



Other than the only three in history,...and all on 9/11.



Again, a troofer claim, not based in reality.





When fairytale history books also tell us that the only 3 steel

framed buildings that ever, in the history of the world,

completely collapsed due to fire alone.



http://www.ae911truth.org



INcorrrect, only troofers claim steel framed buildings haven't

collapsed due to fire alone. There was one about a quarter mile from

where I sit that did about 45 years ago. Only 3 stories, but it was

a steel framed building. More are found, if you really look for

them.



When you troofers make up nonsensical claims that have no basis in

reality, why is it a shock that most people think you're a joke?











Oh really ?

I don't suppose you have any links even to a newspaper story about

that building in your area.



45 years ago?? Highly doubtful, even obits of big shots in the local

paper are hard to find. I doubt seriously if the article would say

anytthing about how the building was constructed.





Or any others as you seem to imply.



No one thinks I'm a joke,....but have you looked in the mirror

lately ?



There are very few people who DON'T think you're a joke, and they are

all kOOkers themselves, soo...





Self delusion seems to be your main talent in life.













So, you have no proof, not even verification of how the building you

specifically mention was constructed. Or any proof it actually ever

existed at all.



Everyone I can think of who saw it burning and collapsing is either dead

(Our parents), or are friends of mine, so you wouldn't believe them

anyway.



No verification of any of these OTHER BUILDINGS that were of steel

frame construction, and fell due to fire, which you claim are all over

the place. ....and you dare to call me delusional ?



If you actually looked for them, you can find them. But that would

destroy your faith in Troofery..You have to work at it, to avoid the

kOOkpages that searches mostly return.



If that happened, you wouldn't be so special anymore. Your belief in

fantastic things about 911 makes you delusional. Maybe ****ing

Delusional with a capital F and a D fits you better.





You sir,...are a RACIST, and a homophobe, and a bald face liar.



A racist?? How do you come up with that claim?? Proof? Got something I

said that was racist?



A homophobe?? I'm not like you troofers, who almost always call people

gay. I have no problems with gay people.



I'm not lying about the building, it's just not a big enough disaster,

and too far back in time to have been scanned, oh well, it's not like

you believing me is really important to me. Your anger is all I need.

Does your jaw hurt from all the teeth clenching?









I'm not surprised, as that is just the response I'd expect from a Racist

Homophobe Al-quieda terrorist.

BDK is all of that and so much more.

Notice how they as terrorists never have to provide any original topics under the same GG+ or Usenet/newsgroup account, and they have so many accounts to use.

Simply by giving them a reply is how they and others of their ZNR kind get paid.

Op 9-10-2013 13:05, Brad Guth schreef:
On Tuesday, October 8, 2013 10:54:27 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
BDK wrote:

In article , lid says...



BDK wrote:

In article , lid

says...



BDK wrote:

In article , lid

says...



BDK wrote:

In article , lid

says...



Rocky wrote:

"Bast" wrote in message

...





Rocky wrote:

I always thought it was strange that the rest of the alleged

Flight 77 burned up inside the Pentagon with the exception of

one small part. Well, after watching the following video we

will all know the trick behind that one small part. See:



Flight 77 debris was American Airlines Flight 965

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFBFGSimy_c



And again we are left with supporting evidence that neither

Flight 11 or Flight 77 took off on 9/11/01.



WTC-1 and 2 Sequence RDX and Thermate Detonations Implemented

by CDI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAVzQHrcPNo



As far as hijackers are concerned we need look no further than

The 911 Commission to see evidence that the Commission itself

was hijacked.



Rocky









And ask why Bush didn't even think a 9/11 investigation was

warranted,....until he was pressured into it.

...Then both Bush and Cheny REFUSED to give testimony under

oath.



9/11 was an inside job.



On 9/11/01 itself I became very suspicious about things.



I was in the LA area during the First Interstate Bank fire and

it kept standing after the fire in LA so I knew something was up

after seeing the Twin Towers collapse and collapse without

giving any fight.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_I...ate_Tower_fire



I used to watch every jet I could and I'd been around plenty of

large airports too but the bottom of the alleged Flight 175 was

strange to say the least. Plus, I used to play Flight

Simulator a lot and I never managed to fly between the two

towers at speed so I don't know how anybody could hit one

particular tower at will. It is easy to land with a long flat

runway but the towers were straight up and down so it was not

easy to tell if you were going to the left or going to right of

them.

The Pentagon was a complete joke. I mean they were trying to

tell us it was rammed by a passenger jet with no evidence

whatsoever of that.



I'd heard Flight 93 had landed safely then the story changes and

it had crash landed instead. And then nothing was found where

it was supposed to have crashed in what I now call Shamsville.



Then after seeing WTC 7 fall straight down as fast as a rock it

was obvious we were not told the truth about things.



Then all the crap with the 9/11 commission just like you stated

made it very obvious our government is the best that money can

buy.



While I originally believed that something rammed the South

Tower even though it was not the real Flight 175 now I have my

doubts that any jets crashed on 9/11/01 and will have to wait

to find out exactly how the alleged Flight 175 was pulled off.



Rocky













Well, back in 1993,....we knew this technology was available.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9R787ZlSE0



Back then the Pentagon and al-CIA-qida, was bragging they could

target not only a building, but a specific window in a building



And I'll bet without any notice, most people would think THIS was

plane. if it suddnely flew over them.

http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question...f/tomahawk.jpg



It's a Tomahawk Crusie missle from 1993.

....Now imagine how much they improved the technology by 2001



And it's a lot more believable that a cruise missle would punch

a 16 foot round hole in the pentagon, than a 100+ foot wide 40

foot tall passenger jet.

Not even factoring in the ground effect would not even allow a

passenger jet to fly 5 feet off the ground at 500 MPH for the

better part of a 1/2 mile.



And that is even without thinking about WTC 7 coming down with

nothing hitting it at all.



So much stupidity is so few words. Only a troofer could do that...













And as usual, you have no credible evidence to prove otherwise.

Only childish insults.



Or perhaps you can show us photos of ANY other airline crashes,

where whole passenger jet aircraft vaporized on impact ?



No sane person claims any aircraft "vaporized" on 911. There were

all kinds of parts and debris found. Only troofer kOOks claim

otherwise.



Other than the only three in history,...and all on 9/11.



Again, a troofer claim, not based in reality.





When fairytale history books also tell us that the only 3 steel

framed buildings that ever, in the history of the world,

completely collapsed due to fire alone.



http://www.ae911truth.org



INcorrrect, only troofers claim steel framed buildings haven't

collapsed due to fire alone. There was one about a quarter mile from

where I sit that did about 45 years ago. Only 3 stories, but it was

a steel framed building. More are found, if you really look for

them.



When you troofers make up nonsensical claims that have no basis in

reality, why is it a shock that most people think you're a joke?











Oh really ?

I don't suppose you have any links even to a newspaper story about

that building in your area.



45 years ago?? Highly doubtful, even obits of big shots in the local

paper are hard to find. I doubt seriously if the article would say

anytthing about how the building was constructed.





Or any others as you seem to imply.



No one thinks I'm a joke,....but have you looked in the mirror

lately ?



There are very few people who DON'T think you're a joke, and they are

all kOOkers themselves, soo...





Self delusion seems to be your main talent in life.













So, you have no proof, not even verification of how the building you

specifically mention was constructed. Or any proof it actually ever

existed at all.



Everyone I can think of who saw it burning and collapsing is either dead

(Our parents), or are friends of mine, so you wouldn't believe them

anyway.



No verification of any of these OTHER BUILDINGS that were of steel

frame construction, and fell due to fire, which you claim are all over

the place. ....and you dare to call me delusional ?



If you actually looked for them, you can find them. But that would

destroy your faith in Troofery..You have to work at it, to avoid the

kOOkpages that searches mostly return.



If that happened, you wouldn't be so special anymore. Your belief in

fantastic things about 911 makes you delusional. Maybe ****ing

Delusional with a capital F and a D fits you better.





You sir,...are a RACIST, and a homophobe, and a bald face liar.



A racist?? How do you come up with that claim?? Proof? Got something I

said that was racist?



A homophobe?? I'm not like you troofers, who almost always call people

gay. I have no problems with gay people.



I'm not lying about the building, it's just not a big enough disaster,

and too far back in time to have been scanned, oh well, it's not like

you believing me is really important to me. Your anger is all I need.

Does your jaw hurt from all the teeth clenching?









I'm not surprised, as that is just the response I'd expect from a Racist

Homophobe Al-quieda terrorist.

BDK is all of that and so much more.

Notice how they as terrorists never have to provide any original topics under the same GG+ or Usenet/newsgroup account, and they have so many accounts to use.

Simply by giving them a reply is how they and others of their ZNR kind get paid.



Then stop replying to those shills...

Sometimes you just get to plant small seeds....

Later on they bloom and grow.....

On Wednesday, October 9, 2013 5:54:43 AM UTC-7, Warhol wrote:
Op 9-10-2013 13:05, Brad Guth schreef:

Notice how they as terrorists never have to provide any original topics under the same GG+ or Usenet/newsgroup account, and they have so many accounts to use.



Simply by giving them a reply is how they and others of their ZNR kind get paid.




Then stop replying to those shills...

Sometimes you just get to plant small seeds....

Later on they bloom and grow.....

I stopped with direct replies to the likes of BDK and HVAC as of many years ago.

You seem unable to notice when others or myself have changed.